Search results

The 12.9-inch one has a miniLED-backlit screen "with 2596 full-array local dimming zones", which is supposed to be able to deliver greater contrast and brightness when viewing HDR content. It also weighs about a half-pound more, and requires a larger battery (40.88 watt hour versus 28.65 watt...

(deleted accidental reply to old post)

It doesn't offend me. The idea that some people would use an iPad Pro as their main productivity tool, that is. I'm familiar enough with iPads to see where that is feasible now, and also well-aware of how personal computing developed from the early 8-bit days to where things are now...

Here's a further idea on how Apple could expand, and simplify the marketing of, their Mac notebook lines. (Suggestion to divide laptops into 12"/14" rMB Airs and 16"/18" rMB Pros.) I have relocated the more detailed original post to the M1 Mac thread in the interests of keeping things better...

The iPad Pros do not have macOS. A 12" Apple Silicon rMB would. A 12" Apple Silicon rMB, like M1/Big Sur Macs, could run some iPadOS apps. Current M1 iPad Pros, as things stand, cannot run macOS apps. The 12" Intel rMB has 2304x1440 pixels. Nobody would mind if Apple made that 2560x1600 (vs...

As would an updated version of the 12" Retina MacBook Pro. Keep the weight at 2 pounds; the excellent battery charge life; and the fast recharge. Then add a M1, two USB4( TB3 ) ports in place of one USB-C one, and a scissor-mechanism keyboard, That would fit nicely between the 1-pound 11"...

I believe what he was saying is that Safari for iPad is an adequate replacement for a PC- or Mac-based Web browser, rather than comparing iPads to computers or other kinds of devices, as a whole. My iPad is not new enough / running a recent enough version of iOS/iPadOS for me to comment on...

Yes – but they keep making the top of the line a lot better. You might be able to get a lower-level model for much cheaper than $2K that still improves on old top of the line models.