Search results

In terms of narrative style it is far removed from D&C Brook, so you might really enjoy it. Visually perhaps it's the same. To me it was like Slacker with a more defined philosophical point to it by the end. Rather than just hearing random self-important babbling, he ends up tying all these...

BTW, obviously then I am of the firm belief thatthe entire film was Wiggins' death dream, none of it was really happening to him, except on the philosophical levels mentioned in the film

I truly loved it and it now sits at my #3 for the year spot (behind Memento and Moulin Rouge). I thought that while it begins as what appears to simply be abstract philosophy, it turns out that the film also has a very definate narrative underneath. Probably not coincidentally I found myself...

More dry than Slacker?? Oh dear. BTW, he does have a film where his beautiful filming techiques serve a fast paced and lively story...Dazed and Confused. And that's it. The rest fall into that indulgent catagory. I was afraid WL did, but I was hoping maybe it didn't. I like his visual...