Search results

Who’s defending it? The logo has been changed for many years.

Choosing the logo isn’t up to you or anyone else on this forum so your point doesn’t change anything.

I agree that the cover art shot was iconic and should never have been messed with.

One more thing, I never liked that old Warner logo, so I have zero problem with the new one which I find more appealing to watch on my OLED. As to the cover art, it's not my thing to care a great deal about cover art, but I can understand why others are upset about it because cover art is...

To each his own because I thought The Exorcist 4K/UHD looked fine on my OLEDs. With that said, I have no defense over the cover art and no new bonus material.

Unfortunately, I have to report that the (UK) 4K/UHD menu uses that ghastly new American cover as the screen menu.

My 4KUHD releases are stored in their original packaging. 4K discs are more susceptible to scratches or dust.

I guess I should open it to find out. :laugh:

Look what showed up yesterday from across the pond:

Stop with the film fan accusations! We don't allow such posts here.

Please, enough with the George Lucas and Star Wars talk.

I like the Pazuzu faces. The spider-walk sequence I can do without it.

I agree with you. I prefer the director’s cut.

It's your money!

After reading a review at the other site, I can now understand why some people have a negative reaction to this 4K/UHD release without actually seeing it. Oh well, I think it's a beautiful looking video presentation.

Both versions!

To be fair, everyone is welcome to their opinion whether I agree with it or not. Furthermore, any purchasing decision is strictly a personal decision that only applies to oneself. In short, it's none of my business except my purchasing decision.

Furthermore, it's not difficult for such memories to be muddled by years of seeing that film on home video formats from the LD and VHS/Beta formats to DVD and Blu-ray formats. Not to mention any viewings on HBO and such.

Don't get me started on that subject matter.:D

I still expect this 4K/UHD to sell very well because it's an iconic horror movie. That film genre has little trouble moving units sold.

However, how do we know the framing and color timing was correct on previous releases? I do agree with you about the opening logo and cover art, both issues that I view as minor compared to other people having a major issue with them.

Perhaps, it's just me, but I'm thinking this release is being unfairly judged.

Feel free to do so. I think this 4K/UHD looks wonderful on my OLED.

I think just about all of us thinks the cover art is awful. There is little debate otherwise.

That's a completely different story because you're replacing a totally different studio with another studio logo. Frankly, I think the updated Warner logo used for The Exorcist looks better to my eyes than the old 1972-1984 logo which I never was fond of in the first place.

I received my 4K/UHD today and watched the theatrical cut which was on disc two. I plan on watching the extended director’s cut on disc one in the very near future. Anyhow, below is a quick photo from the end credits for the theatrical cut on disc two. The movie looks beautiful and it still...

Great, mine is scheduled for delivery tomorrow. I'm thinking of watching the theatrical cut first since it's been years since I last watched it. Next month, I'll watch the other version.