Search results

  1. Lee Carbray

    Is this typical for room gain?

    That is fine. That region does look better. You are still a good 10DB up below 80Hz. Did you calibrate even with the mains or are you running hot? Turning down the gain may even things out even more. You may find once you smooth it out that you can localize the sub with the 100Hz...
  2. Lee Carbray

    Is this typical for room gain?

    That is fine. That region does look better. You are still a good 10DB up below 80Hz. Did you calibrate even with the mains or are you running hot? Turning down the gain may even things out even more. You may find once you smooth it out that you can localize the sub with the 100Hz...
  3. Lee Carbray

    Is this typical for room gain?

    The first thing that jumps out at me from the plot is the 65-200Hz region. It is really ragged and so much lower then 65Hz and lower. Do you run the sub fairly hot? This is with the mains on, right? If you do run your sub hot and the mains are on then it looks like you may be able to dial in...
  4. Lee Carbray

    Is this typical for room gain?

    The first thing that jumps out at me from the plot is the 65-200Hz region. It is really ragged and so much lower then 65Hz and lower. Do you run the sub fairly hot? This is with the mains on, right? If you do run your sub hot and the mains are on then it looks like you may be able to dial in...
  5. Lee Carbray

    Is this typical for room gain?

    graph Here is Dan's plot. Sorry I don't have time right now to answer the Bass trap question. Do a seach and there will be tones of info. The tones you used should be fine. Another question about the plot, those are corrected values right?
  6. Lee Carbray

    Is this typical for room gain?

    graph Here is Dan's plot. Sorry I don't have time right now to answer the Bass trap question. Do a seach and there will be tones of info. The tones you used should be fine. Another question about the plot, those are corrected values right?
  7. Lee Carbray

    Is this typical for room gain?

    It is definetly better to cut then to boost. You may find though that you will need to increase the volume once you have made the cut because overall it sounds lower. I must mention as well becasue nobody else has that another option besides a BFD is acoutical treaments like bass traps and...
  8. Lee Carbray

    Is this typical for room gain?

    It is definetly better to cut then to boost. You may find though that you will need to increase the volume once you have made the cut because overall it sounds lower. I must mention as well becasue nobody else has that another option besides a BFD is acoutical treaments like bass traps and...
  9. Lee Carbray

    Is this typical for room gain?

    Right. But they wont just play louder on their own. He will have to up the gain to keep the overall response even. Which would cause him to lose headroom. Or am I crazy? I have always read EQ reduced headroom. I know it did when I reduced the 50Hz peak with my BFD. I guess if he did not...
  10. Lee Carbray

    Is this typical for room gain?

    Right. But they wont just play louder on their own. He will have to up the gain to keep the overall response even. Which would cause him to lose headroom. Or am I crazy? I have always read EQ reduced headroom. I know it did when I reduced the 50Hz peak with my BFD. I guess if he did not...
  11. Lee Carbray

    Is this typical for room gain?

    Care to explain how he would gain more headroom by EQ'ing?
Top