Search results

I had a similar experience at a showing of TVYNS except that while the younger audience did laugh at the early scenes they got decidedly quiet after the crucifix scene and everything leading up to the climax. On the whole they seemed to get into the film after awhile.

Well in all fairness it wasn't Warner's fault that the European money men who owned the rights to the material were being dick's about it...I'm very sure that they wanted to bring this out years ago but were held up by red tape.

So they did a face replacement on the original stunt actress....if done properly , I.E. subtly, that sounds ok.

Also, didn't a similar link to Youtube about 6 pages ago get shut down by the mods here because it was a "copyright infraction" or something along those lines? Maybe they don't want it back up...you think?

I'm a "geek"...."nerd" I don't know about but then again it depends on who you ask. :D Hmm...........

I traded my 100 sided dice for a pewter figure of a rare five headed bugbear from TSR, circa 1978!

Yes, but why did they yank it from their site? That's the question.

If all (within reason) versions of the film are being included then no worries as far as I am concerned. Bring it on and more power to you Charlie. :emoji_thumbsup:

Really? I didn't know that, I always thought many (if not most) FX back then were done on VistaVision cameras which I believe runs standard 35mm but with more of the negative exposed....but this being Douglas Trumble I have no doubt he would demand a larger frame for the quality (I.E. less...

DOH!!! Sorry Ray.....not that one Ray but that other Ray....my last name is Ray by the way....seriously, it is. My bad, but the sentiment is the same and aside from my dumb ass mistake my resolve not to drag this off topic stuff out is.....is......DOH!

Sorry, but that is as far away from "constructive" as it gets, that's more in line with the attitudes you might find on chatroom's over at AOL not here at HTF....Granted, this may be a bit idealistic, but not flat out insulting "newbies" helps make this forum special. Oh, also there might be...

:confused: So because he was a newbie (to DVD's and or HTF I guess) he deserved a "hard time"? I'm sorry but that ain't the HTF I have grown to love over these last seven years, that kind of stuff belongs in a newsgroup....IMO anyway. Anyway I agree with Zen, ship it to me in a paper bag for...

:laugh: :emoji_thumbsup:

I was thinking exactly the same thing, Zen. It pretty much ruins Gaff's "gift" to a retiring BR he clearly respected (and also wanted to replace).

I'm not suggesting that the only SE box set should be some big bulky collectable....but for us hyper nerd fans...well, I would shell out the cash for a collectable SE set. I certainly didn't see any complaints at the Kong tin being offered as an alternative to the basic two disc set. Now for...

How about Deckard's gun? Not sure how you could fit the discs in but it would definitely be a conversation piece.....(hee hee, get it?)

:) My thoughts exactly, Robin B.

Ah, that slipped by me, thanks Paul.

I believe there is a Warner Brothers chat coming up here at HTF, so that would be a good time to ask not only about BR but Forbidden Planet as well.

That's how you do that, I was wondering about this from other threads, thanks David.

Doh, Damin is correct, my bad. Will-B's caps are in post #538 & Magnus T's are in post #563.

On page 14 Will-B posted some HD caps & on page 15 Magnus T has a few comparisons between the HD and the 1997 DVD.....although I still say that the third HD cap has a color balance that I have never noticed in that scene before.

Well I hate the film.......I wonder why I am so obsessed with it though? Well I can't find the interview that Scott said this in but I remember around the time of White Squall he said in an interview that he preferred it to be ambiguous, he certainly believed that Deckard "was" but leaving...