Search results

you are much better off with the squeeze enabled

Yes Johnny that is exactly what it means, HOWEVER when the squeeze is properly applied none of that resolution is wasted on the black bars outside the 16x9 window.

Thank you Man, I was hoping someoen else would jump in as i could not seem to come up with an adequate explaination.

Ok John if you are so sure then explain how there MUST be a loss of resolution, hmmm lets see same number of scan lines on both tv's so how can there be less resolution. the whole point of a squeeze mode if to compress the resolution into into the viewable area.

Yes John you are correct, and Jim you are assuming the 4:3 tv cannot do the squeeze and i specifically said that a 4:3 tv with the squeeze ability. what you said is however correct if the 4:3 tv cannot do the squeeze, but then there are nto very many 4:3 HDTV's that cannot do the Squeeze...

I would Love it if someone would jump in on this, because there is no loss of resolution between a 4:3 tv with the anamorphic squeese and a 16x9 tv.

Just to clarify If your set on a Widescreen hey go for it, but you seem to be misinformed. 1) 4x3 tv's are just as much HDTV's as 16x9 2) if you consider approximately 5% smaller to be MUCH smaller then hey thats your opinion, but a 36" 4x3 showing widescreen is approximately 5% smaller...

the 34" toshiba can be had for much less than the sony, and the greyscale on the toshiba's is generally amazing. though considering the 36" 4x3 is the same price i would get that, it has the same screen size as the 34" widescreen when your watchign WS material and it does the squeese so there is...