Search results

  1. John Tompkins

    Receiver VS. PreProcessor as a Prepro..Which and why?

    Yogi, I just called harmonaudio to ask these specific questions about thier current ratings on the avr8000 and the service guy didnt even know if it was per channel or all channels driven, also if it was peak to peak etc...so you may be right ?...anybody know for sure how harmon kardon comes...
  2. John Tompkins

    Receiver VS. PreProcessor as a Prepro..Which and why?

    Darrylm and Yogi, I'm not dissputing or even making the case that a receivers internal amps are as good as external amps..Heck, Im an amp freak ,heres a few that I have owned...parasound 885, 2205a, mccormack dna 1, carver 806, carver thx753, carver 1.0, hk 2.1, hk, 1.5, hk 5800, sampson 700...
  3. John Tompkins

    Receiver VS. PreProcessor as a Prepro..Which and why?

    One good thing about a receiver is that you can use its internal amps to drive your back four speakers and get an external two or three channel amp for your l/r/c.. I just recently sold a lex dc-2 for 1700.00 and a parasound 2205 for 1200.00 also a parasound 855 for 350.00 (total is 3250.00)...
  4. John Tompkins

    Receiver VS. PreProcessor as a Prepro..Which and why?

    Nick, My opinion is that it depends on what your going to use it for. If music is very important to you then using a pre-pro makes a world of difference over a receiver. Having said that I feel for HT that the differences are MUCH less apparent. Reciever decoders, chips etc. have came a long...
Top