Search results

There were even newspaper articles about it. If it can sustain debate for that long, then it’s certainly not the non-issue some people want to make it out to be. Remember that phase a short while ago when people started referring to original mono track as the “original” mono track? It...

It's just a debate, and Mr. Harris is well able to defend his views. I can’t understand why some other members seem to take any criticism of his decisions as if it was a personal insult. I'd much rather spend my time reading posts that dissect the problems with a release than the pervasively...

Because my ears never needed an action blockbuster version of Vertigo.

You would have thought that by the 90’s the studios would have had enough respect for Hitchcock’s work not to encourage a compromise to something that is tacky and detrimental. If people enjoy the remix than that’s perfectly fine and they should not be hounded for it (the same goes for...

Sorry, didn’t mean to be presumptuous. I got an overwhelming sense of compromise from you post more so than approval. :D

Well there you have it. Richard A. Harris doesn’t approve of the remix. Alfred Hitchcock certainly doesn’t approve of the remix. The only people that approve of the remix are Universal Studios. It’s a shame they wouldn’t allocate the time and money spent creating a whole new audio track to...

If it were possible to derive the dialogue from the audio at hand then surely it would be possible to derive the original effects as well. And I hardy think “they probably won’t notice the difference” is an appropriate defence, when we’re talking about one of the greatest films ever made and...

If you really think the 5.1 track is meticulously reconstructed you should really try comparing it with the mono. The sheer amount of important details omitted and pointless additions is truly confusing. Apart from the opening gunshot another laugh-out-loud effect is when Madeline’s car slowly...