Search results

That CD is just the usual stuff if you already have a goodly amount of JFK material. I think it's actually TV audio material taken from the 1988 A+E replay of NBC coverage.

It's a good thing I don't participate regularly in this thread any longer or else I'd never get anything in life done! :D Dave, thanks for fighting the good fight against Mr. Knox's silly tricks of asking questions based on non-existent anomalies to try and muddy up what has been quite...

"Ok... but WHERE did they get that description from? A flash of a face in a window 100 yards away and they come up with an accurate height and weight?" That's not a mystery at all. The description came from Howard Brennan, who had noticed the man in the window prior to the motorcade for quite...

"True, but he had no idea there was a "roll call" and that he was the only person who missed it, since he wasn't there." What does this mean? You're working on the job, there is no announcement that workers can go home and you just "assume" its okay to be the only employee in the building who...

But Booth's scheme was what we can only call a simple, spur of the moment conspiracy involving a few accomplices, and not the result of the kind of organized planned effort by larger forces that people have pushed for the JFK assassination and even the Lincoln assassination as well. Only four...

Powers sat on his film for decades and refused to let anyone see it saying it was "my property". His bullheadedness did no one any favors all that time.

(1) LHO was seen by Howard Brennan firing a gun (2) LHO's fingerprints were on the rifle (confirmed by Dr. Scalice in 1993) (3) LHO fled the scene, had no alibi and then murdered J.D. Tippit and attempted to kill another officer when arrested. Man enough to respond to those points, Chris? :)

Yes, I answered them all in full because as David points out, the physical evidence and the report of 19 forensic pathologists trumps every "question" you ask and exposes why they are the phony buff questions that have no business being asked in the first place. And with regard to Stringer...

"WRONG, WRONG, WRONG..." But right, right, right. :) We have constructed the scenario of how this moment in history unfolded. You say this is not how this one moment in history happened. Okay, but now the ball is in your court to explain just exactly how that moment in history unfolded...

"Eric - You just seem to be in denial that the Federal Goverment LIES to you repeatedly. You cannot even begin to believe in JFK conspiracy theory unless you can accept that fact." This is rubbish. The JFK assassination should not be looked at through the lens of prejudicial views of the...

"Of course the burden is on me. The govt can float anything out there and put the burden on me to prove them wrong. For example: President/Yellowcake/Niger/Satate of the Union." Since you are starting from a bogus premise to begin with, that makes your attempt to carry it further to the...

"But if you do believe the intelligence agencies had a part in the conspiracy, that calls into question the validity and handling of all evidence." I reiterate: *What* presumption can there be for such a belief without a major political axe to grind? Especially given the total absence of...

Why does *anyone* believe that intelligence agencies are connected? Because of relevant evidence or because a bunch of conspiracy authors with political axes to grind like to throw out empty speculation? I think anyone who thinks that intelligence agencies are connected are frankly people with...

No. All relevant materials are out except for matters of intelligence gathering and protecting the names of innocent people. There is nothing of an essential nature that one needs to figure out who killed John F. Kennedy that is classified today (and for that matter, it's been that way since...

That isn't so. All releveant documents were declassified under the 1992 JFK Assassination Materials Act. There's nothing left hidden of a relevant nature. HSCA material was to be hidden until 2039 but that was perfectly normal for a lot of committees (if you ever bothered to check how much...

Brian, they were streamed live so the only way I could get them was to put a tape player up to the speakers and have absolute silence in the rooom for seven hours two days in a row which I did. Sound quality isn't perfect but good enough to have all this documented on cassette. WBAP, which...

I think there was one radio station that in the early hours of the assassination may have had a legit recording of gunshots but the tape was erased over later that same afternoon. However, the reporter who made it and heard it that afternoon told either Jim Moore or Gerald Posner (I forget...

"The piece you seem to be missing is believing with apparent blind faith that they are telling you the truth - that the evidence is not altered/replaced" Wrong. That is not how the scientific process of historical methodology works. You do not make assumptions without having any factual...

The problem is that conspiracy buffs invite such a broad brush to be applied to them because too often they are just repeating the same disinformation about the assassination over and over again. When questions about the "changed motorcade route" keep getting asked when they shouldn't, the broad...

"Who said he had to be, you said HE WASN'T THERE." And I admitted my mistake and moved on from it. Why can't you? I've never claimed to be infallible when I have to summon certain info from pure recall sometimes. "Funny, I don't see it that way. The official White House Photographer, the...

Chris, I can't take the notion seriously that you or any other buff is intersted in the truth since the alarming pattern of deception and lies by conspiracy authors and filmmakers always manages to get a collective yawn from people like you and not faze you in the slightest. To me, that...

"Okay, I will. Since you've lost track of the argument, allow me to jog your memory. You said "he wasn't even there." I proved to you that not only was he there" If I used the wrong choice of words, I'll plead guilty. Crenshaw inflated his importance with regard to working on JFK, and that is...

"Now you've really screwed up." No, I haven't. Kindly go back through the entire Warren Commission Index and you will find that Crenshaw's participation in the effort to save JFK's life was barely significant compared to those who appeared before the Commission. I didn't need the JAMA piece...

"However, like the folks who decry Stone or other CT for not giving a rebuttal, a rebuttal was not given by Stone or anyone else." Excuse me, but considering the propaganda campaign of free passes that Stone has gotten from the critics for more then a decade, not to mention the fact that...

"Oswald was proven guilty in the court of public opinion" No he wasn't since public opinion almost from the beginning wanted to believe conspiracy. "Never given a lawyer, Which is everyone's right as an american" Because he specifically asked to be represented by one attorney, John Abt...

"The former mistress of LBJ" There is not a scintilla of evidence that she ever was a mistress of LBJ. "said that he told her he was going to get those goddamn Kennedys and it would all be over soon." This is what is known as hearsay and innuendo from an unreliable source. "She also...

No, it won't be rerun but you can buy a VHS or DVD from them. They had a phone number for that I can post when I check the tape again.

I had to revisit this assertion once again. "The fact of getting off 3 shots from that bolt action is incomprehensible to me, sorry." Dr. John Lattimer, a man 89 years old, was able to do it using that very type of rifle in a demonstration on the program last night in 7.2 seconds. One...

There is no confession. Pure and simple.

The documentary was one of the best produced on the subject, taking its place with such gems as the 1967 CBS series, the 1993 CBS special and 2000's "False Witness." The juxtapositioning of the lies of Oliver Stone's movie with the truth, delivered in blunt terms by Jennings, offers a taste...