Search results

So for Spider-Man 2 if the 4k digital files were the source for both the film and the DVD, then we aren't really talking about "tranfer" quality then, are we? We are just talking about "filtering, downres, and compression" quality, although that is a mouthful.

I think that I have always had this interpretation as well. I thought that transfer just meant going from one format to another, whether it be film to whatever HD master they use, or film to 480 MPEG-2, even if the HD master was an intermediate step. So what is the real "technical" definition...

Yes, combined they do. But consider that the superbit takes up 6.8 gigs of an 8.5 gig disc. That means that it averaged 6.1 Mbps bitrate for video and 7.3 Mbps for video and audio combined. I have a hard time believing that the commentaries would have threatened the 10 Mbps cap and that the...

The one thing I can't help noticing is that a lot of people are purchasing one version and wondering what they are missing on the other one. Sure you can describe special features, video, and audio quality, but you never really know if they would be deal breakers unless you see and hear them...

I ended up with the Superbit version, mostly because the movie is the big purchase for me, and because I'l be getting the ten-disc matrix set choke full of enough features to fill the little spare time I get to watch them I do care about special features, but they are usually single view...

Chris, I think your posts have hit the nail on the head.

That really echos how I feel. I'll only be purchasing Spiderman 2 one time on standard definition DVD. If Columbia and other studios want to pull this crap, it is too bad because it just makes me see less in theaters and puchase less on DVD due to irritation towards the studios that it causes...