Recent content by JamesNelson

I'm a little confused. If ICFOS was Universal's first 3-D feature, what did the 3-D trailer play with?

Fantastic news Bob and Greg! Can't wait! I was there for the 2003 3-D Expo showing and enjoyed it immensely. I'll be picking up 2 copies to support the cause and your efforts. btw...be careful when mastering the audio, because "...at these levels, sound can KILL!" :D

There are several Golden Age 3-D films where the depth of the title cards is misplaced in the stereoscopic stage. Inferno and Mad Magician are two of the most egregious. Man In The Dark had the opposite problem: the titles are correct but the city-scape behind them is in reverse 3-D. Next time...

I would think Kiss Me Kate would be given serious consideration ahead of some of those other titles.

Nothing deleted...the mermaid had a breast reduction. Seriously.

Did you follow the link I posted? There are three different passive Panasonic displays listed.

Only Panasonic's passive 3-D displays are 1/2 HD resolution. Their active 3-D displays are full HD.I don't think they have any passive plasmas. Refer to this list which details actual (effective) 3-D resolution for various display models.

...or before some of us shrivel up.

Trade 'ya. Mine's got a camel in it.

Cell envy. I've got it too.

Local Hero. Pretty please. With sugar on top.

I have no issues with mindless popcorn fare...as long as some of the spoils are rolled back into preserving and honoring the film hertiage that brought us here in the first place.

What I would really like to see is for someone to produce a 3-D BD version of the SmileBox process, wherein the left and right edges of the virtual screen appear physically closer to the viewer then the center. That would be an interesting experiment and would go farther in recreating the...

Unlike the set in the video, my set had the BD on the left and the film frame on the right. I must have gotten the left-handed version. :D

LOL...You know that some people are going to believe this, don't you?