Jump to content


which reciever is better

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2 replies to this topic

#1 of 3 OFFLINE   Christian_C



  • 13 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 29 2002

Posted February 12 2002 - 03:43 PM

which reciever is better, the denon AVR-5800 or the kenwood VR-5900. THe denon costs more but... nevermind denon is better. what is da difference between these denon AVR-5800, and the denon AVR-4802.Are watts the only diference? And should the watts be equally be spread out over the speakers or unevenly over them. I am gettin 1 sub, 2 rears, 2front, and 1 center. Thanks!

#2 of 3 OFFLINE   Scott O'Keeffe

Scott O'Keeffe

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 77 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 01 1999

Posted February 12 2002 - 04:28 PM

IMHO, friends don't let friends buy Kenwood.

There's a reason the 5800 is more expensive. Not that I don't admit there's some attractive features with the Kenwood, imho, you're comparing apples to oranges.

Many have said that the 5800 is the best receiver out there (okay, B&K), but I haven't heard that statement with the Kenwood. Ever. Posted Image

#3 of 3 OFFLINE   Terrell



  • 3,217 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 11 2001

Posted February 12 2002 - 06:23 PM

The B&K AVR-307!Posted Image Well, don't buy the Kenwood over the Denon.