-

Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Melancholia (aka When Worlds Collide


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 of 23 Ron-P

Ron-P

    Producer

  • 6,283 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 25 2000
  • Real Name:Ron

Posted September 03 2011 - 05:40 AM


Looks like a retelling of a classic.   http://movies.yahoo..../video/26498306
You have all the weapons you need...Now fight!


#2 of 23 Edwin-S

Edwin-S

    Producer

  • 5,574 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 20 2000

Posted September 03 2011 - 11:43 AM

Looks like it raises pretension to a whole new level.
"You bring a horse for me?" "Looks like......looks like we're shy of one horse." "No.......You brought two too many."

#3 of 23 TonyD

TonyD

    Who do we think I am?

  • 16,085 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 01 1999
  • Real Name:Tony D.
  • LocationDisney World and Universal Florida

Posted September 04 2011 - 09:32 AM

Ron I don't thi k this is going to be anything like the older When Worlds Collide.
facebook.com/whotony

#4 of 23 Ron-P

Ron-P

    Producer

  • 6,283 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 25 2000
  • Real Name:Ron

Posted September 04 2011 - 05:14 PM

It most likely will not but, but it sure looks like it's going to have a very similar storyline, without space ships and so forth though. The trailer just reminded me a lot of that film.


You have all the weapons you need...Now fight!


#5 of 23 PatH

PatH

    Second Unit

  • 325 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 04 2004

Posted September 04 2011 - 05:27 PM

Merchant-Ivory meets When Worlds Collide. Looks boring. PatH

#6 of 23 todd s

todd s

    Lead Actor

  • 6,879 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 08 1999

Posted September 30 2011 - 04:26 PM

What the F..... :confused:
Bring back John Doe! Or at least resolve the cliff-hanger with a 2hr movie or as an extra on a dvd release.

#7 of 23 R-T-C Tim

R-T-C Tim

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 192 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 26 2006

Posted October 02 2011 - 08:57 PM

For anyone unfamiliar with the Danish director's work - this is not a sci-fi or disaster film. I saw it yesterday in the cinema and it was an amazing experience, but like most of his projects it is deliberately outside of the normal genre categories. A harsh portrayal of a woman with depression and how it affects those around her, combined with a world ending scenario. The closing shot is one of the best cinema endings of all time.
Mondo Esoterica.net - From the Wild West to Gothic Europe...

#8 of 23 Russell G

Russell G

    Fake Shemp

  • 9,764 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 20 2002
  • Real Name:Russell
  • LocationDeadmonton

Posted October 03 2011 - 07:40 AM

I'm a fan of the directors, I look forward to this playing town.



#9 of 23 Southpaw

Southpaw

    Supporting Actor

  • 881 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 02 2006

Posted November 05 2011 - 04:48 AM

I saw this was available on VUDU already but for like $10 to rent the HDX. I don't know, I might check it out.

#10 of 23 Michael Elliott

Michael Elliott

    Lead Actor

  • 7,125 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 11 2003
  • Real Name:Michael Elliott
  • LocationKY

Posted November 05 2011 - 05:28 AM

HDNet Movies will be playing this (for free) three times on Thursday starting at 7:30.

#11 of 23 Richard V

Richard V

    Screenwriter

  • 1,521 posts
  • Join Date: May 14 2009
  • Real Name:Richard

Posted November 11 2011 - 07:53 AM

Saw it on HDNet Movies. Strong performance (and nude scenes) by Kirsten Dunst, which I don't think she has ever done before. Decent performances by others in the cast including Kiefer Sutherland, Udo Kier (in a cameo), Charlotte Rampling, Charlotte Gainsbourgh (as Dunst's sister), Stellan Skarsgard, and John Hurt. Overall very depressing movie, although very well done.
See you at the pah-ty, Richter.

#12 of 23 TonyD

TonyD

    Who do we think I am?

  • 16,085 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 01 1999
  • Real Name:Tony D.
  • LocationDisney World and Universal Florida

Posted November 20 2011 - 10:42 AM

Just watched this the other night and  i'm still trying to wrap my head around it. whatever is going in in Von Trier's mind must be a nightmare to live with. This movie is all about depression and how it takes over ones entire world before completely destroying it. The prologue is a brilliant short film just on its own and basically encapsulates the entire movie in about 6 minutes.  Dunst was nude in a couple of shots but it isn't anything that is a reason to see the movie. There was nothing sexy or romantic about the scenes even a little bit. It felt to me to be metaphor for depression and how the only way to find relief is for everything to come to an end and in this movie the "everything" is taken to the furthest extreme possible.  On the other hand when someone dies, doesn't that mean the end of the world for that person, once you're gone there is no world anymore, it's all gone. Maybe that was von Trier's point I saw Tree Of Life only a few weeks ago and I can barely remember much more than a handful of scenes. This movie is stuck on my mind and the end and most of the movie will take some time to fade, especially the last shots of the movie. To me is the exact opposite to Tree Of Life. Amazing, depressing and frightening. Don't know if I can ever watch it again. That's a compliment.  4.5 stars
facebook.com/whotony

#13 of 23 cineMANIAC

cineMANIAC

    Screenwriter

  • 1,862 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 03 2008
  • Real Name:Luis
  • LocationNew York City

Posted December 06 2011 - 01:10 AM

Good movie. Refreshingly lacked the trappings of a typical disaster flick: people gathered around a TV watching footage of scientists scrambling to come up with a solution, epic scenes of masses of people in panic, etc. One thing though - was Kirsten Dunst just depressed or was she actually stark raving mad? That part I didn't get.
 

 


#14 of 23 Richard V

Richard V

    Screenwriter

  • 1,521 posts
  • Join Date: May 14 2009
  • Real Name:Richard

Posted December 06 2011 - 03:47 AM

Good movie. Refreshingly lacked the trappings of a typical disaster flick: people gathered around a TV watching footage of scientists scrambling to come up with a solution, epic scenes of masses of people in panic, etc. One thing though - was Kirsten Dunst just depressed or was she actually stark raving mad? That part I didn't get.

She struck me as being bipolar, with depression being the major psychological status.
See you at the pah-ty, Richter.

#15 of 23 Hans M.

Hans M.

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 227 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 05 2003

Posted December 13 2011 - 02:09 AM

I'm hoping to catch the film again. I don't feel it's a perfect movie (uneven maybe a good word), but it was something to see on the big screen. I wrote a pretty in-depth review here: http://indieethos.wo...d-of-the-world/ Check it out, and I invite comments there too. I've recently written about many indie films, so some might find it an interesting blog to follow. I also write about indie music and have a profile on the way with an important indie musician (Lou Barlow of Sebadoh and Dinosaur Jr.)

#16 of 23 Ronald Epstein

Ronald Epstein

    Studio Mogul

  • 39,586 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 03 1997

Posted January 22 2013 - 12:50 AM

So, this reply comes more than a year later.


Someone talked me into watching Melancholia and I
took the opportunity to watch it yesterday.


I am still haunted by it a day later.

On the one hand, it's a brilliant film.  On the other,
there are lots of moments, particularly dealing with
its first half, that I question the necessity of.


It was a pleasure reading the review Hans wrote

(referenced in above post).  That and other reviews

sort of cleared up some of the oddities that I am about

to discuss here.


So, I am not going to add spoilers.  I am simply going

to warn anyone who hasn't seen this film not to read

any further.....


My problem with this film rests solely on Justin's (Kirstin

Dunst) behavior in the first half of the film.


I can accept her sudden bout of extreme depression if

she became internally aware of her pending doom.  It is

told to us, near the end of the film, that Justin was aware

of "things."  After all, she correctly guessed the number
of beans in the jar which is a near impossibility.


However, not one bit of her sudden bout of depression
makes sense by watching the first 30 minutes of the film.

Here we are introduced to a very happy couple, full of
smiles and love.  You mean to tell me that the groom
had no idea that his bride was inflicted with this mental disorder?


Why so much money spent for an immensely grand wedding

when (and if) everyone knew that a happy marriage between

these two individuals was not possible?  And what is with all

the emphasis on the dysfunctional family?  That would explain

Justine's depression (family history), but again, did her personal

battles exist prior to the wedding or during?


I mean, it's completely hard to grasp those happy moments

at the beginning of the film and then understand why she

has sex with this guy she just meets at the party.  It's behavior

that is completely unexplainable, perhaps even when attributed

to depression.


Again, it kind of all makes sense if she suddenly became

aware of her future -- but none of that is made completely

clear in the storytelling.


It's the second half of the film that really caught my interest....


I think Melancholia did an amazing job of portraying people's

feelings when they are aware of an oncoming Apocalypse. The

way that story slowly unfolds and gradually builds intensity had

me riveted to the screen.  We go from uncertainty, where Jack

(Keifer Sutherland) is confidently comforting his loved ones to

certainty, where he completely falls apart.  It's an amazing change

in character, and perhaps the most haunting aspect of this film.


Watching this film, I felt very bothered by the final 20 minutes,

which is exactly what the story aimed to do.  Sound played a

very important part of this.  To watch these characters in the

final moments of their lives as the rear channels provide this

constant rumbling reminder of an oncoming planet, is a truly

disturbing experience.

In all, I thought Melancholia was pretty damn amazing.  I love

the style in which the story was told, despite the fact that not

all of it completely made sense to me.  This is a film that I am
certainly going to revisit in the near future.

Ronald J Epstein
Home Theater Forum co-owner

 

gallery_269895_23_10043.jpg Click Here for the latest/hottest Blu-ray Preorders gallery_269895_23_1316.jpg Click Here for our complete Blu-ray review archive

gallery_269895_23_773.jpg Click Here for our complete 3D Blu-ray review archive gallery_269895_23_992.jpgClick Here for our complete DVD review archive

gallery_269895_23_7246.jpg Click Here for Blu-Ray Preorder Release Schedule gallery_269895_23_3120.jpg Click Here for forum posting rules and regulations


#17 of 23 Tommy R

Tommy R

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 147 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 17 2011

Posted January 22 2013 - 06:52 PM

I saw it some months ago, and agree with the above; perplexed by the first half but really loved the second. It was a very beautiful film and really resonated with how I find myself looking at things in life at times. Now excuse me while I go nude planet-bathing.

#18 of 23 Brett_B

Brett_B

    Supporting Actor

  • 720 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 1999

Posted January 24 2013 - 04:14 AM

I had the excellent opportunity to watch this film twice in a span of 24 hours when it came out (was on On-Demand same day as the theater - saved me a long drive). I agree with most reviews about being confused during the first half, but after watching it the second time it made better sense...to me. Since this thread had been started over a year ago, I am going to add some SPOILERS below. What really summed up the first half was the revelation towards the end of the movie when Kirsten Dunst's character told her sister that "she knows things", and quoted the amount of jelly beans in the jar. I viewed the prologue as a glimpse into Justine's "prediction". When she arrives at Claire's house for the reception, she pauses to look up at the stars and notices the "red" star (this is the same star shown in the prologue getting eclipsed by the planet Melancholia). It is at this moment (my opinion) that she realizes that this vision is coming true - the whole world is going to end, and the entire human race will no longer exist anywhere in the universe. The first half then plays as a character study of all of the people important to Justine. We see her husband is only concerned about the wedding night sex, Claire's obsession to present a perfect wedding, the boss who is more concerned about his work than of the people he employs, the father who can't have a sincere talk because he is too wrapped up in his partying, a mother who just wants to bad mouth the father, and so on. So, in all, after the first viewing I wasn't sure if I liked it or hated it. After the second viewing, I ended up LOVING it.

#19 of 23 Bryan^H

Bryan^H

    Screenwriter

  • 2,609 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 03 2005

Posted January 24 2013 - 07:18 AM

To put it in persepctive, I thought 'Antichrist' was a more cheerful film. 'Melancholia' was draining. Not saying it wasn't good, I liked it quite a bit. I liked the character Claire(Charolette Gainsbourg) who overall was my favorite character in the film. I felt bad she was stuck with a manic depressive at the end of the world, but what an ending! Very good film-It certainly made a dreary day(the day I watched it) more dreary, and dark. That is true art I guess.

housekeeping 2.jpg

"She always does that, she just wanders away"

 

 

 


#20 of 23 Aaron Silverman

Aaron Silverman

    Lead Actor

  • 9,483 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 22 1999
  • Real Name:Aaron Silverman
  • LocationFlorida

Posted January 24 2013 - 08:39 AM

Wow, Ron, you and I watched this movie on the same day! Weird. I'm glad we're all still here, though. :) Interesting film. I think I enjoyed thinking about it afterward more than I enjoyed actually watching it, as it was mostly very slow paced. Justine's revelation at the end was intriguing, as it put her depression in a whole new light. Maybe. There are still questions -- was the intent really that she's psychic? Or did she maybe overhear the number from someone, and was messing with Claire? There was some interview footage with Lars von Trier in the extras. I'm only vaguely familiar with him (I think his only other film that I've seen is Zentropa, which was many years ago), but my understanding is that his films are all quite dark and depressing and comment on American society (although he's never been here). He seemed pretty upbeat, and stated that this is the happiest ending of any of his movies! It makes sense, though, if you look at it as the sisters finally making peace, despite the apocalyptic overtones. Incidentally, IMO the first nude scene was not sexy but the second one sure was. Kristen's birthday suit is pretty magnificent. :)
"How wonderful it will be to have a leader unburdened by the twin horrors of knowledge and experience." -- Mr. Wick




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users