Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Samsung LN46C630 or UN46C6400


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 of 3 OFFLINE   KiaKia

KiaKia

    Auditioning



  • 3 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 10 2009

Posted November 15 2010 - 03:46 AM

Please help a relative novice when it comes to quality tvs currently on sale. I think it's time I replace my Samsung LNS4051D. I've found two possible options. Both are listed for 1000. The LN46C630 seems to be a popular choice in terms of quality for good value, but the UN46C6400 is listed at a higher price in every other case. Is it because it has a better quality overall? I should mention the UN46C6400 seems to be lacking a warranty option. My main use for my television is binge bluray viewings. Thanks!

#2 of 3 OFFLINE   Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul



  • 38,067 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted November 19 2010 - 06:38 AM

The UN version is the sexy LED-backlight version that is fetching a pretty penny.  It's supposed to have the best black level performance over the conventional LCD backlight solution which the LN version employs.
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#3 of 3 OFFLINE   tls36

tls36

    Agent



  • 39 posts
  • Join Date: May 20 2008

Posted November 24 2010 - 12:41 PM

Not to hijack your thread, but I am looking at a similar Samsung but in a 55 inch.  How much of a factor is motion blur on a LCD vs LED?  The 700 series features 240Hz refresh rate and the 600 series has a 120 HZ refresh, opinions?????




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users