Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Waterworld Isn't All Wet...


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10 replies to this topic

#1 of 11 OFFLINE   AaronSCH

AaronSCH

    Second Unit



  • 284 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 10 2006

Posted November 16 2006 - 03:09 PM

I just gave Waterworld a whirl and sampled a number of scenes to get a feel for the picture quality. Well, some of the optical effects are somewhat dated and tend to be where dirt is most apparent. The image is fairly sharp and does have some of that 3-D pop that we have come to expect. My affection for this film has grown over the years so I am gonna be a bit gentle and say that I was somewhat pleased but not overwhelmed by what I have seen of this transfer.

#2 of 11 OFFLINE   TonyD

TonyD

    Executive Producer



  • 16,203 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 01 1999
  • Real Name:Tony D.
  • LocationDisney World and Universal Florida

Posted November 17 2006 - 12:23 AM

i wish it included the longer cut.

i still look forward to seeing it anyway
facebook.com/whotony

#3 of 11 OFFLINE   Ronald Epstein

Ronald Epstein

    Studio Mogul



  • 40,283 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 03 1997

Posted November 17 2006 - 12:37 AM

I have not seen this transfer nor ordered this HD-DVD.

I do want to comment on something....

This conversation could have very well taken place in
another recent thread concerning another Universal title
that also was cited as having "less than desirable" image
quality on HD-DVD.

I want to make sure that those of us who complain about
such things are not attacking the transfer itself, but rather
our impressions of how this film looks on a higher definition
format that magnifies any imperfections in the way the film
may have looked theatrically.

 

Ronald J Epstein
Home Theater Forum co-owner

 

 Click Here for the latest/hottest Blu-ray Preorders  Click Here for our complete Blu-ray review archive

 Click Here for our complete 3D Blu-ray review archive Click Here for our complete DVD review archive

 Click Here for Blu-Ray Preorder Release Schedule  Click Here for forum posting rules and regulations


#4 of 11 OFFLINE   Ed St. Clair

Ed St. Clair

    Producer



  • 3,320 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001

Posted November 17 2006 - 02:52 AM

Don't HATE the format.
HATE the source!
;-)
Would like to hear (ha, ha) how the sound compares to the DTS SD DVD.
Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!

#5 of 11 OFFLINE   Darren Gross

Darren Gross

    Supporting Actor



  • 500 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001

Posted November 17 2006 - 06:19 AM

Are any of the scenes exclusive to the TV version included as a supplement?

#6 of 11 OFFLINE   AaronSCH

AaronSCH

    Second Unit



  • 284 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 10 2006

Posted November 17 2006 - 06:52 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darren Gross
Are any of the scenes exclusive to the TV version included as a supplement?

As far as I can tell this is the same version that Universal released on standard DVD. It clocks in at 136 min which is the same as the SD DVD. I didn't watch the whole movie but maybe someone else knows. There are no extras. By the way Darren, I also wish Warner (I think they hold the distribution rights) would get around to releasing "Night of Dark Shadows" as well as "House of Dark Shadows." Barnabas Collins is my second favorite blood-sucker. People have been asking for those titles for a number of years.

#7 of 11 OFFLINE   Tino

Tino

    Producer



  • 5,361 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999
  • Real Name:Valentino
  • LocationMetro NYC

Posted November 17 2006 - 08:41 AM

Seems the same to me too...right down to the lack of an lfe channel!!

Looks great, despite dirt in scenes.
It's gonna be a hell of a ride. I'm ready. .

#8 of 11 OFFLINE   Scott Simonian

Scott Simonian

    Screenwriter



  • 1,282 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 20 2001

Posted November 17 2006 - 09:22 AM

Everyone says that Waterworld didn't have a LFE channel. I could have sworn that my dts dvd had a 5.1 signal to the receiver.

I should check that out.
Another supporter of 1080p and uncompressed multi-channel sound!

My Twin 18's. 50cuft of box, tuned to 11hz and with 2k watts on tap.

#9 of 11 OFFLINE   Darren Gross

Darren Gross

    Supporting Actor



  • 500 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001

Posted November 17 2006 - 10:20 AM

Thanks, Aaron. Your support and enthusiasm are much appreciated!

They're terrific films and a DVD release would really open them to an entirely new generation.

#10 of 11 OFFLINE   Ed St. Clair

Ed St. Clair

    Producer



  • 3,320 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001

Posted November 17 2006 - 11:57 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Simonian
Everyone says that Waterworld didn't have a LFE channel. I could have sworn that my dts dvd had a 5.1 signal to the receiver.

I should check that out.
The DTS IS 5.1.
The DD is 5.0.
Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!

#11 of 11 OFFLINE   MarekM

MarekM

    Supporting Actor



  • 858 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 11 2006

Posted November 17 2006 - 08:16 PM

so if there is DD+ 5.1 on HD-DVD, I hope it's with LFE channel Posted Image

Marek





Forum Nav Content I Follow