Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

Tax Agreement Puts End to Oscar Swag

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 of 13 OFFLINE   Henry Gale

Henry Gale


  • 4,633 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 10 1999

Posted August 17 2006 - 12:40 PM

Movie stars appearing at the Academy Awards will no longer receive the lavish goodie bags they have come to expect -- worth as much as $100,000 each and including freebies such as iPods, resort vacations, coupons for laser eye surgery, jewelry and high-priced lingerie -- because of a crackdown by federal tax collectors.

"I was born to ramble, born to rove
Some men are searchin for the Holy Grail
But there ain't nothin sweeter 
Than riden' the rails."
-Tom Waits-

#2 of 13 OFFLINE   Holadem


    Lead Actor

  • 8,972 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 04 2000

Posted August 17 2006 - 12:43 PM

This is terrible news. Poor things. -- H

#3 of 13 OFFLINE   MatthewLouwrens



  • 3,034 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 18 2003

Posted August 17 2006 - 01:27 PM

Although the article starts out saying they won't be getting the bags any more, that doesn't seem to be true, based on the rest of the article. The recipients simply have to pay taxes on the items as non-cash income.

#4 of 13 OFFLINE   Adam_S



  • 6,150 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2001

Posted August 18 2006 - 05:18 AM

I've never thought it was fair that the government is supposed to get a share of your gifts as well, that's why I don't report bday or grad money (not like I'm getting a lot, more or less pocket money. On the other hand I can understand with the high value of the gifts why there's a limit, otherwise what's to prevent each person from gifting their year's salary to their spouse (and vice versa) and neither having to pay any taxes? The sad part is that while the presenters don't necessarily need the swag it literally has made the careers of many of the people lucky enough to get included (it's sort of like getting a product into wal-mart in terms of the success the various individuals and boutiques garner from it for the rest of the year).

#5 of 13 OFFLINE   Chad R

Chad R


  • 2,174 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 14 1999
  • Real Name:Chad Rouch

Posted August 19 2006 - 01:33 AM

What about George Clooney who sold his bag off at auction for charity? Would he have to pay taxes and then turn around and write it off as a charitable donation?

#6 of 13 OFFLINE   mattCR


    Executive Producer

  • 10,228 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2005
  • Real Name:Matt
  • LocationOverland Park, KS

Posted August 19 2006 - 02:09 AM

I do agree, though, they are basically not "gifts" but they are used as a means to promote and advertise product. Every person who stuffs something in that bag does so hoping that Reese Witherspoon will be seen going to their store with a gift certificate. Or Jim Carrey will try out a new iPod. Or whatever. They are being paid for promoting it by receiving an item free.

Ask Me about HTPC! (Threads in HTPC / PMs always responded to)

This signature is povided by MediaBrowser 3 Trakt Plugin: Media Browser 3

#7 of 13 OFFLINE   seanOhara


    Supporting Actor

  • 820 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 09 2005

Posted August 19 2006 - 02:28 AM

It's my understanding that all nominees get these bags, not just the rich stars. This will really suck for writers and editors and anyone involved with an indie film that gets nominated.
My Blog
Les Miserables Volume 1 with my reading of "Four and Four"
Librivox Short Story Collection 34 with my reading of Jack London's "War"

#8 of 13 OFFLINE   ToddP


    Stunt Coordinator

  • 172 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 15 2003

Posted August 19 2006 - 09:53 AM

You don't have to report birthday or grad money (maybe I misinterpreted and this was a joke/sarcasm). Gifts up to $11k in value are exempt from taxation.

#9 of 13 OFFLINE   Adam_S



  • 6,150 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2001

Posted August 19 2006 - 12:09 PM

sarcasm todd. Posted Image

I believe the presenters are given the giantly huge valuable baskets as their only thank you/compensation for presenting. Since presenters are usually the top of A list actors, that makes sense. I can't remember about the nominees, they may not get a gift basket, if they do it is much smaller. On the other hand, most will get gift baskets from their studios, production companies, colleagues, friends and family. they just aren't likely to include plastic surgery and 30k vacations

#10 of 13 OFFLINE   Lew Crippen

Lew Crippen

    Executive Producer

  • 12,060 posts
  • Join Date: May 19 2002

Posted August 20 2006 - 01:08 AM

Presenters are ‘working’ and the packages they receive are now (and should always have been) considered ‘pay’ or ‘compensation’. As such, it should be taxed.
¡Time is not my master!

#11 of 13 OFFLINE   MatthewLouwrens



  • 3,034 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 18 2003

Posted August 20 2006 - 01:33 PM

#12 of 13 OFFLINE   Paul McElligott

Paul McElligott


  • 2,598 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 02 2002

Posted August 21 2006 - 03:57 AM

Posted Image
R.I.P. DVDSpot

#13 of 13 OFFLINE   Chris Lockwood

Chris Lockwood


  • 3,215 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 21 1999

Posted August 21 2006 - 08:11 AM

I don't see why they'd have to stop giving the bags- the recipients just need to pay the taxes on them. They could give back anything they don't think is worth the taxes. This is really nothing new- stuff like that has always been considered taxable income. It's much like prizes on a game show. You'd think most of the recipients would have accountants doing their taxes who would know that. (I knew it, & I'm no accountant.)

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users