Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

A Scanner Darkly


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
23 replies to this topic

#1 of 24 OFFLINE   Dave Hackman

Dave Hackman

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 173 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 11 2000

Posted July 18 2006 - 02:07 PM

This movie is a trip. Substance D is a highly addictive drug derived from a small blue plant. The government is cracking down on local users hoping to bring in a big fish.

Keanu Reeves plays Bob Arctor an undercover agent assigned to scan through a bunch of recorded video on a group of suspected users. This group just happens to be Bob’s roommates who share a house with him.

Arctor and his boss don’t really know who each other are because every time they meet they are both wearing scramble suits. This suit hides their identity by shifting between approximately a million and a half fraction representations of men, women and children.

I enjoyed listening to this film. The dialog between the paranoid friends is worth the price of admission alone. Robert Downey Jr. is hilarious as he breaks down his characters paranoia to new levels of ridiculousness. Woody Harrelson plays the part of a clueless junky wonderfully and his bantering back and forth with Downey is quite entertaining. This would be a good movie just to listen to in a car while driving without any visuals.

The interpolated rotoscoping technique makes the actor’s look like weird 3d cartoon characters. I liked this look because it complements the drug-induced story without overpowering it.

This dialog driven movie focuses on its absurd characters that are all on drugs. There are no flying space ships and no interplanetary missions. The overall story is good but it’s not for everyone and definitely not recommended for family viewing.

I look forward to adding this to my movie collection.

A

#2 of 24 OFFLINE   Inspector Hammer!

Inspector Hammer!

    Executive Producer



  • 11,067 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 15 1999
  • Real Name:John Williamson
  • LocationWilmington, Delaware

Posted July 18 2006 - 10:12 PM

I'll say this for Richard Linklater, the man is nothing if not diverse.

He can do two of the most poignant romance films in existance, Before Sunrise and Before Sunset, one of the most delightful and funny comedies to come along in awhile with School of Rock and then do something like this.

It looks and sounds interesting, and it's also nice to see Winona Ryder working again.
"That's Jack Bauer!!!!!! He's coming for me!!!!!" - Charles Logan

#3 of 24 OFFLINE   Juan C

Juan C

    Second Unit



  • 450 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 22 2003

Posted July 18 2006 - 10:26 PM

You can legally view the whole first 24 minutes of the film here.

#4 of 24 OFFLINE   Will_B

Will_B

    Producer



  • 4,733 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2001

Posted July 19 2006 - 04:06 AM

Any fan of Deckard's quandary in Blade Runner will find much to enjoy in this other P.K. Dick story.

The rotoscoping style of animaton really works for this film. It gives the story the same feeling I get from computer adventure games -- the sense of another world, but an immediately relatable other world.

I noticed that the animators even preserved Ryder's "little dipper" mole pattern across her chest! (And I would know that why? Sigh).
"Scientists are saying the future is going to be far more futuristic than they originally predicted." -Krysta Now

#5 of 24 OFFLINE   BrettGallman

BrettGallman

    Screenwriter



  • 1,392 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 11 2002

Posted July 26 2006 - 03:43 PM

So, I thought this was going to be getting a wide release this weekend? My city is listed on WB's website, but none of the theaters are showing it. So, anybody know what's up?
Oh, the Horror - Horror Reviews from All Decades and All Sub-Genres!
Balls Academy -  Your Alma mater for teen films, raunchy, low-brow comedies, sexploitation & coming of age dramas.
Other recent reviews: Super | Thor Tobacco RoadSource Code | Sucker Punch |


#6 of 24 OFFLINE   Ron-P

Ron-P

    Producer



  • 6,283 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 25 2000
  • Real Name:Ron

Posted July 26 2006 - 03:52 PM

I'll be bling buying this one. It should be out by Xmas, I hope.
You have all the weapons you need...Now fight!


#7 of 24 OFFLINE   Mike.B

Mike.B

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 185 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 09 2003

Posted July 27 2006 - 02:20 AM

I saw this in the theater with my wife this past Sunday. It was one of my most highly awaited films of the year, and I am pleased to say that I was thoroughly impressed. It managed to even exceed my expectations. Without giving anything away, a few quick thoughts:

- The animation is amazing and works perfectly for this movie. I couldn't imagine it being done any other way.
- The acting is great. Downey Jr. was made for this role, and Harrelson, Ryder, and Keaunu are all just right as well.
- The story isn't nearly as confusing as I was led to believe, based on some cursory reviews prior to seeing it. You do have to pay attention though, and you'll likely have plenty of questions by the end. But it's not hard to follow at all.

Really, the more I think about it, the more I like it. I can't wait for the DVD and hope that this gets the royal treatment (*cough*Criterion*cough*).

Could very well end up on the top of my list at the end of the year. Posted Image

#8 of 24 OFFLINE   Seth Paxton

Seth Paxton

    Lead Actor



  • 7,588 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 05 1998

Posted July 29 2006 - 07:54 AM

A Scanner Darkly
8.5 of 10


I agree that the roto work was even more applicable here than it was to Linklater's Waking Life. It enhances the film far beyond what it would be as live action with some CGI.

As for the story, this was one of the most true films to Dick's stories IMO, though I haven't read this particular story. This is not a compliment, at least not in full. Dick's work is both interesting and creative yet also frustratingly abrupt in its shifts and endings. A lot of his stuff feels skeletal rather than fleshed out, and the film versions have typically enhanced what he originally wrote (Total Recall, Minority Report, Screamers, Blade Runner).

This film is more of that jumpy flow, odd twists and sudden ending (with iffy resolution, as in "was there any?") It leaves a hint of things to come but far less than normal open ended films do.



Finally there is the dialog, and that's why you go see this film. This is real addict-talk, not some caricature version of dope smoking fools. I don't know how much of this came from Linklater vs the original story, but its as tight as Linklaters other films so I assume he had plenty to do with it. All the actors deliver it well and with such conviction that you have to love it, though of course Woody and Robert Downey aren't exactly strangers to that world anyway. Posted Image

#9 of 24 OFFLINE   Aaron Reynolds

Aaron Reynolds

    Screenwriter



  • 1,709 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 06 2001

Posted July 30 2006 - 07:38 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth Paxton
[b]
Finally there is the dialog, and that's why you go see this film. This is real addict-talk, not some caricature version of dope smoking fools. I don't know how much of this came from Linklater vs the original story, but its as tight as Linklaters other films so I assume he had plenty to do with it. All the actors deliver it well and with such conviction that you have to love it, though of course Woody and Robert Downey aren't exactly strangers to that world anyway. Posted Image

I've read the book about a dozen times; it's one of my favourites. The dialogue for much of the film is lifted directly from the book, and what isn't feels exactly like the book.

If nothing else, this movie is for fans of the novel -- it is about as perfect a visualization of the book as you could ask for. From the moment I heard that this film was being made I began to wish ferverently that the gear-counting bike scene would make it into the film and would come off brilliantly -- it's there, nearly verbatim, and it's wonderful. (It's missing the downbeat ending and overall it's in a different context -- in the book, it's what alerts his superiors that something's wrong with his mind, when he reacts angrily while retelling the story to "Hank".)

#10 of 24 OFFLINE   Craig S

Craig S

    Producer



  • 5,511 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 04 2000
  • Real Name:Craig Seanor
  • LocationLeague City, Texas

Posted July 30 2006 - 12:50 PM

I saw this today and loved it. The dialog was great, the story was intriguing, and the look of the rotoscoped animation was just spot-on perfect for the tale being told. This is one of those films that you know you'll be able to watch numerous times and find something new in it each viewing.

Those waiting for the DVD should really make the attempt to seek it out in theaters if it's playing anywhere near you. The film looks stunning and is incredibly immersive on the big screen.

9 out of 10 stars for me - one of the best of the year to date.

Three truths about movies, as noted by Roger Ebert:

 

* It's not what a movie is about, it's how it is about it.

* No good movie is too long, and no bad movie is short enough.

* No good movie is depressing, all bad movies are depressing.


#11 of 24 OFFLINE   JohnMcCallum

JohnMcCallum

    Extra



  • 21 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 08 2003

Posted July 31 2006 - 08:07 PM

Can someone explain a couple things to me?

1.
What exactly was the deal with the hooker to Winona to hooker transformation?

2.
What happenned to Keanu's family? Did he just leave them?


Thanks.

#12 of 24 OFFLINE   Aaron Reynolds

Aaron Reynolds

    Screenwriter



  • 1,709 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 06 2001

Posted July 31 2006 - 11:53 PM

1. Hallucination.

2. Maybe he had a family -- he thinks he did -- but Hank says he didn't. That could have been part of Hank's deliberate attempt to break Bob's mind. I don't think the book is definitive one way or the other.


#13 of 24 OFFLINE   NickSo

NickSo

    Producer



  • 4,274 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 02 2000

Posted August 01 2006 - 04:53 AM

Re Question 1:
But when he was looking at the video recording, it also showed the 'transformation' of the hooker, which led me to believe it wasn't a hallucination.


#14 of 24 OFFLINE   Aaron Reynolds

Aaron Reynolds

    Screenwriter



  • 1,709 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 06 2001

Posted August 01 2006 - 05:28 AM

He saw it twice while his mind was disintegrating -- I don't think that it's evidence of anything further than the extent of his brain damage, but it's left up to the viewer/reader to decide.

Note that Freck saw the aphids more than once, and that doesn't make the aphids "real".


#15 of 24 OFFLINE   Will_B

Will_B

    Producer



  • 4,733 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2001

Posted August 01 2006 - 12:12 PM

I wouldn't have believed 1, but, if the film is true to the book, the answer is correct.

I'd have preferred to think that
Winona boinked him while disguised as a substance-D junkie, and that her suit malfunctioned a bit during the night. Though that would be a heck of a suit, to simulate nudity that well.

"Scientists are saying the future is going to be far more futuristic than they originally predicted." -Krysta Now

#16 of 24 OFFLINE   CaseyL

CaseyL

    Supporting Actor



  • 803 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 29 2002

Posted August 12 2006 - 03:50 AM

Just saw this film last night. Wow. Totally superb. I agree with the previous comments in this thread about the animation style. It couldn't have been done without it. The addition of the "Thought Bubbles" over the characters heads were excellent. I didn't find the story unbearable difficult to follow, but definatly not a space-out sort of movie. Well cast, totally enjoyable. Enough Humor to lighten the thing up, but not so much to make it campy. Overall the tragedy of the film came through strong for me. I highly recommend.

#17 of 24 OFFLINE   Angela2

Angela2

    Auditioning



  • 3 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 10 2006

Posted August 12 2006 - 04:42 AM

Hello… cool……. Take a look at THATPosted Image drugsPosted Image moneyPosted Image low;insurance

#18 of 24 OFFLINE   Edwin-S

Edwin-S

    Producer



  • 5,640 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 20 2000

Posted August 12 2006 - 11:50 AM

Is this film supposed to get a wider release? It still hasn't shown up at my local theatre. The first 27 minutes was interesting enough to make me want to see the rest of the film. The animation style appears to work much better for this film than it did for "Waking Life".
"You bring a horse for me?" "Looks like......looks like we're shy of one horse." "No.......You brought two too many."

#19 of 24 OFFLINE   Matt Stone

Matt Stone

    Lead Actor



  • 9,070 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 21 2000

Posted August 19 2006 - 02:15 PM

Just saw it and loved it. Not what I was expecting at all, but it had all of the elements of the great PK Dick stories and all the flair of Linklater's films. Great combination of visuals and dialog without a single reliance on either aspect. I was worried that it would come across as a tech demo, but the roto work really enhanced the move.
In Heaven, everything is fine.
[ 2006 Films | 2005 Films | 2004 Films | 2003 Films | YMDB Top 20 ]
[ Star Wars | Sideshow | HT | DVDs | LDs | AIM: Maulrat87 ]

#20 of 24 OFFLINE   BarryS

BarryS

    Second Unit



  • 424 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 01 2002

Posted September 13 2006 - 05:19 PM

I saw this film today and, like the others, I can't wait to own it. This is truly a film that will be a deeper, more rich experience on repeated viewings. Especially if you're on drugs...

Rick Linklater is one of my favorite directors, and A Scanner Darkly perfectly shows why. He's ambitious, umcompromising and intelligent. I loved Waking Life and I couldn't wait to see the same technique applied to a Phillip K. Dick story. Man, I can't wait for the DVD. No release date yet though, as far as I can tell.