Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

Battlestar Galactica 2003?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
81 replies to this topic

#1 of 82 OFFLINE   Sven Lorenz

Sven Lorenz

    Supporting Actor



  • 529 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 29 2002

Posted March 07 2004 - 11:50 PM

Is there any news about a R1 DVD release of the Miniseries (which now should be called the Pilot)?

It's out in the UK - here's the only review I could find:

http://www.dvdlard.c...ent.php?id=1325

I hope the US DVD will have more extras and the longer version that one of the producers talked about in an interview.

#2 of 82 OFFLINE   Dave Scarpa

Dave Scarpa

    Producer



  • 5,308 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 08 1999

Posted March 08 2004 - 02:47 AM

Well since Sci Fi has issued almost all the other Mini's they've done like Dune and Taken I imagine it's just a question of When. I'm sure you'll see it before the series debut's to try to bolster interest. I'll pick it up I kinda Liked it...
My DVD Collection

The Megaplex

#3 of 82 OFFLINE   Sven Lorenz

Sven Lorenz

    Supporting Actor



  • 529 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 29 2002

Posted March 12 2004 - 12:37 AM

I've bought the UK disc and the reviewer was wrong. The picture quality is pretty bad - it's grainy, soft and has a lot of edge enhancemant. The Making Of is actually very good - it is promotional but it includes interviews with most of the actors, writers and producers - there's even an interview with Richard Hatch, but he only talks about the old series. The best moment in the Making Of is the beginning of the interview with the actress who plays Starbuck: "Hi, my name is Katee Sackhoff and I play Starbuck. DEAL WITH IT!"

#4 of 82 OFFLINE   Christopher D

Christopher D

    Second Unit



  • 283 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 16 2000

Posted March 13 2004 - 07:28 AM

I second that on the video quality -- it's not particularly sharp. Thanks, Universal! On the other hand, the disc is cheap, anamrophic, and available, so I'm not complaining too hard. I enjoyed the darkness and paranoia of this version and am looking forward to the series.

#5 of 82 OFFLINE   Eric Paddon

Eric Paddon

    Screenwriter



  • 1,167 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 17 2001

Posted March 13 2004 - 02:02 PM

"The best moment in the Making Of is the beginning of the interview with the actress who plays Starbuck: "Hi, my name is Katee Sackhoff and I play Starbuck. DEAL WITH IT!"" A moment that earned her my eternal hatred.

#6 of 82 OFFLINE   Tony Whalen

Tony Whalen

    Producer



  • 3,150 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 29 2002

Posted March 15 2004 - 05:26 AM



Posted Image I love it. Not mad about the remake, but good for her.

#7 of 82 OFFLINE   Eric Paddon

Eric Paddon

    Screenwriter



  • 1,167 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 17 2001

Posted March 18 2004 - 05:01 PM

Actually that particular making of set an all time record for egomania and running down of the source material, which in large part explains the animosities that exist between those who made the miniseries and the fans of the original. The total in-your-face disrespect they have for the original which that remark of Sackhoff's typifies.

#8 of 82 OFFLINE   Terry St

Terry St

    Second Unit



  • 393 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 21 2002

Posted March 18 2004 - 06:11 PM

I'd agree with you 100% if you were talking about Galactica 1980! Now *that* was an abomination that betrayed every last charming aspect of the original show. The new Galactica mini-series was infinitely better than Galactica 1980! Personally, I did not expect or even *want* a verbatim rehash of the original series. It had it's run. We enjoyed it. Why make the exact same show again? The mini-series showed some imagination and reworked the original into something recognizable, but fresh. Not everything worked, but on the whole it was a good pilot for what will hopefully be a good series. Besides, how good does it really have to be in order to compete with Enterprise?

#9 of 82 OFFLINE   Eric Paddon

Eric Paddon

    Screenwriter



  • 1,167 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 17 2001

Posted March 18 2004 - 08:39 PM

"Why make the exact same show again?" We were weeks away from getting a bona-fide *continuation* which did justice to the whole "next generation" concept. But 9/11 alas and the departure of Bryan Singer killed that whole project. The only thing I want to see is a continuation set in the next generation, and one that maintains the values and core philosophy of Galactica, which this miniseries with its dysfunctional characters and obsession with sex while ripping off story elements from bad movies like "In Harm's Way" most assuredly did not.

#10 of 82 OFFLINE   Sven Lorenz

Sven Lorenz

    Supporting Actor



  • 529 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 29 2002

Posted March 18 2004 - 08:49 PM

In the review which I linked to in my first post gives a comparison between the old and the new show that I agree 100% with: The old show is like Adam West's Batman - the new show like Michael Keaton's. I liked the old show when I was a kid - when I caught some reruns a while back I was a little embarrassed that I ever liked something THAT bad.

#11 of 82 OFFLINE   Sven Lorenz

Sven Lorenz

    Supporting Actor



  • 529 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 29 2002

Posted March 21 2004 - 10:37 AM

http://www.tvshowson...cfm?NewsID=1281

The R1 version is coming.

It's going to have a commentary, deleted scenes and a documentary.

Posted Image

#12 of 82 OFFLINE   Sven Lorenz

Sven Lorenz

    Supporting Actor



  • 529 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 29 2002

Posted July 29 2004 - 12:32 AM

DavisDVD is reporting that it's going to be 'uncut' with a running time of 185 minutes.

http://www.davisdvd.com/news/tv.html

If I remember correctly it was twice 88 minutes on TV - so it's going to have at least nine additional minutes - even more if they show it in one piece and cut the end credits of episode one, the opening credits of episode two and the 'Previously on' bit.

#13 of 82 OFFLINE   Eric Paddon

Eric Paddon

    Screenwriter



  • 1,167 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 17 2001

Posted July 29 2004 - 03:40 AM

Wrong, Sven. The original was a classic work of sci-fi with strong characters, strong stories and it had as good a ratio of great episodes to clunkers as Star Trek did. The key difference is that Star Trek was a formula series which meant stagnant character growth throughout its entire run whereas Galactica gave us the first genuine case of story arc development as well as advancing the characters over what they were like at the outset. The Ron Moore travesty is nothing more than a ripoff of bad Sci-Fi cliches that Galactica had the guts to avoid, as well as a ripoff of a bad movie like "In Harms Way", and now having gone out of his way to trash the original series and offend all its fans, Ron Moore, having suddenly discovered he is incapable of doing anything original with this woeful property, has now resorted to gimmicks to try and appease the original fans like casting Richard Hatch in a couple episodes (and not surprisingly get him to mute the criticism he engage in of Moore's efforts before the miniseries aired) and now vowing to remake a number of classic episodes (guess TOS wasn't so bad after all if it's now his lifeline for plots!). The real difference between TOS and Moore's fake version isn't the difference between Adam West and Michael Keaton (which wasn't that great a movie to begin with), it's the difference between Classic Coke and New Coke. The former satisfies while the remake is tasteless junk that needed to slap the name of a classic on it to justify the existence it never should have had.

#14 of 82 OFFLINE   Robert Floto

Robert Floto

    Supporting Actor



  • 739 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 27 1999

Posted July 29 2004 - 04:49 AM

Don't both basically taste like battery acid...
Movies I would purchase instantly if they were available in their correct aspect ratio:
Death Trap, Innocent Blood, The Shadow, and Remo Williams

#15 of 82 OFFLINE   Eric Paddon

Eric Paddon

    Screenwriter



  • 1,167 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 17 2001

Posted July 29 2004 - 06:37 AM

I still marvel at the ability of anyone who was a "fan" of the original to see anything redeeming in Ron Moore's version.

#16 of 82 OFFLINE   Kevin Hewell

Kevin Hewell

    Screenwriter



  • 2,073 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 28 2003

Posted July 29 2004 - 07:34 AM

I was a fan of the original when I was twelve. Now, it's just as Sven said. When I watch it now I see how incredibly cheesy it was. I'll still watch it for nostalgia and the camp value but I prefer the new version now that I'm an adult.

#17 of 82 OFFLINE   Jeff

Jeff

    Supporting Actor



  • 950 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted July 29 2004 - 08:35 AM

I don't know what Eric is talking about. I thought the Battlestar miniseries was awesome. I was really impressed with the acting and dramatic tone about it. It wasn't just all out action. I thought it was better than any of the pilots from Star Trek. Anyway, I've seen it twice and I can't wait for the DVD and the upcoming TV series. Jeff

#18 of 82 OFFLINE   Eric Paddon

Eric Paddon

    Screenwriter



  • 1,167 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 17 2001

Posted July 29 2004 - 08:52 AM

Considering that the original's enduring popularity with its fanbase has nothing to do with "cheesiness" and everything to do with the solid storytelling, epic premise and the ability of Richard Hatch, Dirk Benedict, Lorne Greene, Herb Jefferson, Anne Lockhart etc. to create likable characters easy to connect with, I think the argument that the original can only be enjoyed through a child's perspective is very silly, not to mention a demeaning insult to those of us who stay fans of the show as an adult even as things we might have liked as a child are consigned to the yesteryear bin. Of course if cliches about dysfunctional families, recycled secularism and gratutitous sex floats your boat instead, then Moore's fake version is perfect.

#19 of 82 OFFLINE   David Lambert

David Lambert

    Executive Producer



  • 11,386 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 2001

Posted July 29 2004 - 09:58 AM

In my experience, the thing that grates most upon the nerves of original fans of BG is that Moore and company choose to use the same name for the 2003 story they told. Yes, there are supposed to be similarities, but if you call the ship something else and call the Cylons something else and change the names of the characters, well now you have a completely new story that's "in the vein of the old 80's BG series, but presented in an entirely new way". You see, Moore - who I respect in all other ways expect for this one - could have chosen to put his story into a completely different universe, and happily told the press that he was inspired by Battlestar Galactica, but chose to give the idea a different twist (or perhaps it's that it's a number of differnet twists). To take the property and re-do it this way dashes the hopes and dreams of the fans - like me - who for years nursed a (perhaps unreasonable) scenario that BG would experience a ST:TNG-ian "rebirth" and pick up where the story left off oh so many years ago. Several people had ideas on how to make that happen (Richard Hatch, of course...but I also heard that Tom DeSanto wanted a crack at it, among others). But Moore's outbidding for the property, just to take his story and roll it up into that particular title, just hit a wrong nerve with die-hard fans of the classic original. My purchase of the box set of the complete epic original series reminded me just how enjoyable this was, and how the people behind the show - both in front of and behind the cameras - put forth great effort to make it so solid. Look at how it's endured through the years...that's no accident.
DAVE/Memphis, TN

...Want to see your favorite show on DVD?

#20 of 82 OFFLINE   Robert Floto

Robert Floto

    Supporting Actor



  • 739 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 27 1999

Posted July 29 2004 - 10:21 AM



And yet some of us are indeed capable of this amazing feat.
Posted Image
Movies I would purchase instantly if they were available in their correct aspect ratio:
Death Trap, Innocent Blood, The Shadow, and Remo Williams




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users