Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

Misleading Trailers?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#1 of 35 OFFLINE   Paul_Sjordal

Paul_Sjordal

    Supporting Actor



  • 831 posts
  • Join Date: May 29 2003

Posted October 19 2003 - 11:16 PM

I was just leafing through my Titan: A.E. DVD when the included trailers jarred a memory loose. As awful as the trailers on the official DVD are (and you have to admit they're pretty bad), the early teaser trailer I first watched in a movie theater was so awful I decided right then and there to not watch this movie. It was very similar to the first half of Trailer B (the half before they show any 2D animation), and the 3D animation they used was some kind of primitive early rendering that looked like a high school project (never mind the bad voice acting that involved none of the principals). The teaser trailer was awful enough that I didn't see the movie until it had been out on DVD for quite some time and even then I rented it on a lark. Not only did the movie not stink as bad as I expected, but I found that I liked it quite a bit, which came as a shock. So what trailers mislead you? Did any cause you to expect a movie to be far better or far worse than it actually was?
“It’s great to be known, but it’s even better to be known as strange.” —Takeshi Kaga

#2 of 35 OFFLINE   Qui-Gon John

Qui-Gon John

    Producer



  • 3,527 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 02 2000

Posted October 19 2003 - 11:40 PM

A trailer I think they really screwed up is KANGAROO JACK. When I saw it, I thought the movie was all about this kangaroo and expected he would be talking almost all the time, basically a corny talking kangaroo movie, not for me. Well I watched it because my daughter's friend brought over the DVD and instead I found it to be a fun, dodge the hit-men type comedy and the kangaroo really only talked when the one guy had a hallucination. (Then some as the credits rolled, but I looked at that as out-takes). Needless to say, I found it much more enjoyable than the previews made it seem. Of course, I admit it's no 'great cinematic achievement', but definitely much better than the previews had me believe.

#3 of 35 OFFLINE   James T

James T

    Screenwriter



  • 1,643 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 08 1999

Posted October 20 2003 - 06:24 AM

Mission Impossible 2. I think everyone expected it to be 90mins of what you saw in the trailer instead of everything you saw in the trailer with 90 minutes of filler.

#4 of 35 OFFLINE   TheLongshot

TheLongshot

    Producer



  • 4,119 posts
  • Join Date: May 12 2000

Posted October 20 2003 - 08:20 AM

The one that comes to mind is "Nightbreed", which markets the film as "generic horror plot", which the film wasn't. Jason

#5 of 35 OFFLINE   ThomasC

ThomasC

    Lead Actor



  • 6,526 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 15 2001

Posted October 20 2003 - 08:33 AM

Paramount marketing/PR department screwed up in early 2002 with We Were Soldiers and Changing Lanes.

#6 of 35 OFFLINE   Dan Rudolph

Dan Rudolph

    Producer



  • 4,042 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 30 2002

Posted October 20 2003 - 12:15 PM

It seems many trailer makers think the only options are mislead the audience, or give away the entrie movie. Out of those two, I'd rather be misled.
My Collection

#7 of 35 OFFLINE   Joey Gunz

Joey Gunz

    Second Unit



  • 299 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 26 2003

Posted October 20 2003 - 01:32 PM

The early trailer for the Kurt Russel film Soldier had me excited about the film. It showed a lot of action: dogfights in space, ground battles, etc. And while the film did have action, it wasn't the kind of action I was expecting. As a matter of fact, if you own a copy of the Soldier DVD, check out the trailer thats included on it. You'll see a quick peek of a space battle on it. It looked good, but its not in the actual movie. For some reason, they cut it out. Why? Who knows.

#8 of 35 OFFLINE   Tim Glover

Tim Glover

    Lead Actor



  • 7,813 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 12 1999
  • Real Name:Tim Glover

Posted October 20 2003 - 02:03 PM

There are many trailers that are misleading and some that fool you into thinking that the movie could be good. I think of one in particular: 3000 Miles to Graceland starring Kevin Costner & Kurt Russel. The trailer looked funny, slick, and original. The movie turned out to be one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Just awful, and mean spirited. But that's just what I think. :b

#9 of 35 OFFLINE   DaveB

DaveB

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 195 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 19 2002

Posted October 20 2003 - 02:03 PM

I recall early marketing for the M. Knight film, "Unbreakable" had people expecting "The Sixth Sense 2" -- which it clearly wasn't. Although I thoroughly enjoyed the film in spite of the mismarketing, many left the theaters disappointed. David

#10 of 35 OFFLINE   Rob P S

Rob P S

    Screenwriter



  • 1,996 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 22 2002
  • Real Name:rob

Posted October 20 2003 - 02:06 PM

Wasn't Freddy Got Fingered marketed as a comedy? A lot of people were misled by that one.

#11 of 35 OFFLINE   Raymond_H

Raymond_H

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 244 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 31 2001

Posted October 20 2003 - 03:14 PM

I think Hulk was misleading, but that also could've been the expectations of the fans of it being a major action-oriented film.

Raymond

#12 of 35 OFFLINE   Doug R

Doug R

    Supporting Actor



  • 787 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2000

Posted October 20 2003 - 04:48 PM

My favorite recent mis-leading trailer is when the Radio trailer is shown during football games or on ESPN. You'd think it was Remember the Titans 2 instead of I Am Sam 2.

#13 of 35 OFFLINE   David Baranyi

David Baranyi

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 81 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 17 2003

Posted October 20 2003 - 05:02 PM

Joey, it is a common practice that trailers will contain scenes that did not appear in the actual film. Films like Ali and Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring contain scenes that did not appear in the actual film. A few years back, I remembered the Japanese trailer for a Pokemon film where most of the scenes shown never appeared in the film. I felt deceived, but I quickly understood that the non-appearing scenes were used to create drama on this average film. This shows that misleading trailers are not restricted to only Hollywood films. You can find information about misleading trailers by looking at the "trivia" or "alternative versions" section at IMDb's web site.

#14 of 35 OFFLINE   Edwin-S

Edwin-S

    Producer



  • 5,878 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 20 2000

Posted October 20 2003 - 07:08 PM

TREASURE PLANET - The trailer made this film look pretty bland. The film was not nearly as bad as the trailer made it look.

HOLES - The trailer to this movie was a major f#$%up. It made the film look like it was going to be a knock-off of something like "TREMORS". You know, giant whatever appears from wherever to (as Bender would say) "kill all humans". I avoided the film in the theater but rented it later. The film had nothing to do with "creatures"; other than the human kind. The film relied a little too much on synchronicity, but it turned out to be a pretty good movie.
"You bring a horse for me?" "Looks like......looks like we're shy of one horse." "No.......You brought two too many."

#15 of 35 OFFLINE   TheLongshot

TheLongshot

    Producer



  • 4,119 posts
  • Join Date: May 12 2000

Posted October 21 2003 - 04:07 AM

[quote] HOLES - The trailer to this movie was a major f#$%up. It made the film look like it was going to be a knock-off of something like "TREMORS". You know, giant whatever appears from wherever to (as Bender would say) "kill all humans". I avoided the film in the theater but rented it later. The film had nothing to do with "creatures"; other than the human kind. The film relied a little too much on synchronicity, but it turned out to be a pretty good movie. [quote]

Don't know how you got that out of the trailers. While there were a lot of big holes there, it seemed pretty obvious that they were dug by the kids, and not by any "creature".

Jason

#16 of 35 OFFLINE   dan fritzen

dan fritzen

    Second Unit



  • 304 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 19 2001

Posted October 21 2003 - 04:45 AM

Pearl Harbor

I apologize if this becomes a stepping stone to rip this movie but the trailer made it look so good and does not hint at the entire plot/romance at all. I did like the 10 minutes of action and the doolittle raid but the rest was not like the trailer.

My coworkers and I would rip into this movie several times since its release because we were so decieved by the trailer.

The problem is now studios market movies differently to different people.

I.E. Stars wars 2 had completely different trailers aimed at women/girls and i do not think this is right to do. I have been tempted to sue for false advertising, no that I would.
"Other than that Mrs. Lincoln how did you enjoy the show?"

#17 of 35 OFFLINE   Gregg Shiu

Gregg Shiu

    Second Unit



  • 420 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 11 2001

Posted October 21 2003 - 02:34 PM

I can probably count the number of time's I've been "tricked" by a trailer, somewhere around 4. Posted Image Most recently, National Security was a complete waste of time, whereas the trailer was one of the funniest things I'd seen in a while. Recess: School's Out was another godawful mess which resembled the animated series for only about 5 minutes. The other two movies which had misleading trailers came out around the same time. Mission Impossible 2, which someone already mentioned, and Shanghai Noon. I thought the first would be amazing and the latter was absurd, but it's funny how it was the other way around. That's all I can think of for now.
"-king sixty-three hundred dollar suit! COME ON!" - Gob


John 3:16My DVD CollectionMy CD Collection

#18 of 35 OFFLINE   Steve Kuester

Steve Kuester

    Second Unit



  • 268 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 19 2001

Posted October 22 2003 - 01:50 PM

Dan, I couldn't agree more. I thought this was an absolutely beautiful trailer, but the movie felt nothing like it.

#19 of 35 OFFLINE   Edwin-S

Edwin-S

    Producer



  • 5,878 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 20 2000

Posted October 22 2003 - 02:17 PM

Guess I'm not too smart, because the way they opened the trailer with the flyover, fade, cut to flyover, fade, cut to flyover, gave me the impression that the film was going to end up as some creature feature.....regardless of the kids digging those holes. In fact, I thought the digging of those holes was going to be the trigger for whatever "creature event" took place. No part of the story that eventually played out on my TV screen ever came across to me in the theatrical trailer that I saw. The atmosphere set up by the trailer was one of "something weird is coming this way".
"You bring a horse for me?" "Looks like......looks like we're shy of one horse." "No.......You brought two too many."

#20 of 35 OFFLINE   TonyD

TonyD

    Who do we think I am?



  • 16,650 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 01 1999
  • Real Name:Tony D.
  • LocationDisney World and Universal Florida

Posted October 22 2003 - 04:55 PM

edwin i'm sure you are smart, but i never thought there would be a creature. just a bunch of kids digging holes to find soemthing is what i got from the trailer. one that i think was misleading was for about schmidt. tried to make it seem like a comedy, but it was more of a serious movie with some funny moments. i liked the movie in spite of the trailer.
facebook.com/whotony




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users