1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Nymphomaniac (Vol. I & II) Review

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Yavin, Mar 21, 2014.

  1. Yavin

    Yavin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    176
    Likes Received:
    35
    Real Name:
    Ben Mk
    4 out of 5.

    I was quite pleasantly surprised by this. Even at four hours, it wasn't difficult to sit through. More in my full review, including a discussion of the film's more ... um, graphic aspects.
     
  2. SamT

    SamT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    464
    Real Name:
    Sam
    Of his movies I liked Melancholia.

    I heard they were going to use porn actors and superimpose the actors' faces on them. What about that? False?
     
  3. schan1269

    schan1269 HTF Expert
    HW Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    17,038
    Likes Received:
    894
    Location:
    Chicago-ish/NW Indiana
    Real Name:
    Sam
    Shia is au naturel. (watch the Sigur Ros video...)

    Charlotte..like she has anything to hide.

    The girl in the beginning...she dropped kit before this.

    I doubt any body doubles were used.

    Whoever thinks this is "graphic" hasn't seen ShortBus, Ken Park, 9 Songs, Secretary...and how many others?
     
  4. Michael Elliott

    Michael Elliott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Messages:
    7,412
    Likes Received:
    176
    Location:
    KY
    Real Name:
    Michael Elliott
    I wasn't as good as ANTICHRIST or MELANCHOLIA but I still enjoyed the picture. I'm only going *** (out of 4) because I found there to be many flaws including the fact that I really wasn't sure what the point was. Of this trilogy, I thought ANTICHRIST was the best because it made you think about the characters, their actions and everything that was going on. It gave you something to debate. I don't think there's much of that in this picture and after a while it just seems like von Trier wanted to show some sex, violence, dicks and vaginas. What pornographic scenes were here really weren't all that shocking but then again, I watch a fairly wide range of films. With that said, it's easy to see why no one is going to see this picture.

    I thought the performances were pretty good for the most part. Gainsbourg and Skarsgard are extremely good and the film needed talents like them because of all the dialogue scenes. These moments needed to be just as captivating as the "graphic" stuff or else it would have felt uneven. Christian Slater was okay in the picture but why didn't he ever age? Uma Thurman was very memorable in her brief role. As for Shia, give the guy a break. He gave up $20-million to do films like this so I can respect that. Was the performance Oscar-worthy? No but it wasn't bad either.

    I watched both volumes together with just a ten-minute intermission between them. Did it need to be four hours long? Probably not as there are many moments where you feel it dragging on. With that said, had it just been two or three-hours then it wouldn't have been the epic it currently is. I know a longer cut is supposed to be coming and I guess it's going to be even more graphic.
     
    Mark Walker likes this.
  5. Michael Elliott

    Michael Elliott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Messages:
    7,412
    Likes Received:
    176
    Location:
    KY
    Real Name:
    Michael Elliott
    Before the film was made Shia said that they were going to film real sex scenes. Apparently this idea was scratched.

    I guess we'll see when the "uncut" 5-hour version is released. There's some hardcore footage here but the extremely graphic stuff hasn't been seen yet.
     
  6. SamT

    SamT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    464
    Real Name:
    Sam
    Oh ok so it's not released yet. I'm wondering how it is going to be and if the actors accepted it. It would be a first since Caligula. I mean not even a first since Caligula, because as long as I remember the actors didn't know it for that film and never agreed.
     
  7. mattCR

    mattCR Well-Known Member
    HW Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    368
    Location:
    Overland Park, KS
    Real Name:
    Matt
    Short Bus, a film a few years ago, and 9 Songs, I think both had 'real' sex scenes. Blue is the Warmest Color also.

    Lars von Trier's work is very rough for me. I enjoyed Melancholia and think it is fantastically well shot, but Nymphomaniac never really hits that bar. The scenes are too stilted and the narrative just kind of.. lays there. It's OK. But it doesn't have the kind of energy of much better works. I'd give it a C.
     
  8. schan1269

    schan1269 HTF Expert
    HW Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    17,038
    Likes Received:
    894
    Location:
    Chicago-ish/NW Indiana
    Real Name:
    Sam
    9 Songs and ShortBus were both real.

    Ken Park...only two scenes were. The rest were camera angle.

    Young Adam had one real one (Emily and Ewan at the dock...they were "involved"-ish at the time)

    Pillow Book. Supposedly Vivian told Ewan he could...only cause of the "other stuff" going on made sex a moot point.

    Blue is the Warmest Color was all simulated. Yes there was contact...but it was merkin contact.
     
  9. SamT

    SamT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    464
    Real Name:
    Sam
    Just watched 9 Songs and it was real bad! Exactly like porn, no story and only sex scenes except it didn't have the good stuff!

    Their real stuff felt simulated!
     
  10. Aaron Silverman

    Aaron Silverman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 1999
    Messages:
    10,482
    Likes Received:
    486
    Location:
    Florida
    Real Name:
    Aaron Silverman
    Here's a. . .different take on this film. (I haven't read much of it since I haven't seen the movies yet, but it seemed bizarre enough to be worth sharing. :) )

    Lars von Trier’s ‘Nymphomaniac’ Isn’t Porn. It’s a Defense of Jewish Theology.
    Ignore all of that grinding of genitalia; the brilliant film is really an elaborate and hilarious response to St. Paul

    http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/167406/lars-von-trier-nymphomaniac
     

Share This Page