RonGat
Auditioning
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2002
- Messages
- 5
Everyone,
I recently purchased an Onkyo 595 for my new HT but am now having some buyers remorse. I now think I should have bought the Denon 1802 instead. First off, I want to let you know that I could not hear any real differences sonically between the two receivers (with my newbie ears) when I auditioned them. Most people on this forum seem to agree that the performance of each is similar. The Denon just seems to have so many more features than the Onkyo. With the general consensus of the sound quality and power of the two receivers being approximately equal, I really don't understand why anyone (including myself) should buy the Onkyo.
Here are major advantages of the Denon:
1. Full PLII--By this I mean that the Denon has the full range of adjustments to PLII (panorama, etc.). The Onkyo has just the basic watered down version.
2. Pre-outs--The Denon has pre-outs for the front three channels. The Onkyo has none
3. Front inputs--The Denon has front inputs (including optical). The Onkyo has none.
4. Optical out--The Denon has an optical output that can be used for recording digital material, etc. The Onkyo has none.
Here are the major advantages of the Onkyo:
1. Remote control--The Onkyo's remote is better. It doesn't light up, it doesn't learn (although it is programmable), and doesn't have macros. I had to buy a $30 learning remote to control all my stuff anyway (Radio Shack remote, don't remember the number). In addition, the Onkyo is ~ $50 more expensive anyway (online), so extra remote cost with the Denon is basically nil.
There are a few other slight differences (i.e. 2/2 coax/optical inputs in the Onkyo vs. 1/3 coax/optical inputs in the Denon), but nothing as major as I discussed above. I still have the chance to return my Onkyo and get the Denon but I'm afraid that I'm missing something vitally important in the decision making process because the Onkyo is so popular on this forum. Please let me know what I'm missing. Let me know why I should stick to the Onkyo.
--Ron
I recently purchased an Onkyo 595 for my new HT but am now having some buyers remorse. I now think I should have bought the Denon 1802 instead. First off, I want to let you know that I could not hear any real differences sonically between the two receivers (with my newbie ears) when I auditioned them. Most people on this forum seem to agree that the performance of each is similar. The Denon just seems to have so many more features than the Onkyo. With the general consensus of the sound quality and power of the two receivers being approximately equal, I really don't understand why anyone (including myself) should buy the Onkyo.
Here are major advantages of the Denon:
1. Full PLII--By this I mean that the Denon has the full range of adjustments to PLII (panorama, etc.). The Onkyo has just the basic watered down version.
2. Pre-outs--The Denon has pre-outs for the front three channels. The Onkyo has none
3. Front inputs--The Denon has front inputs (including optical). The Onkyo has none.
4. Optical out--The Denon has an optical output that can be used for recording digital material, etc. The Onkyo has none.
Here are the major advantages of the Onkyo:
1. Remote control--The Onkyo's remote is better. It doesn't light up, it doesn't learn (although it is programmable), and doesn't have macros. I had to buy a $30 learning remote to control all my stuff anyway (Radio Shack remote, don't remember the number). In addition, the Onkyo is ~ $50 more expensive anyway (online), so extra remote cost with the Denon is basically nil.
There are a few other slight differences (i.e. 2/2 coax/optical inputs in the Onkyo vs. 1/3 coax/optical inputs in the Denon), but nothing as major as I discussed above. I still have the chance to return my Onkyo and get the Denon but I'm afraid that I'm missing something vitally important in the decision making process because the Onkyo is so popular on this forum. Please let me know what I'm missing. Let me know why I should stick to the Onkyo.
--Ron