Search results

In my opinion this whole new encoding is more a way for Dolby to hopefully get more titles encoded in True HD since for the last couple of years most of the studio video departments have switched to DTS HD Master. The question is whether this new process is significantly better than DTS HDM to...

On True HD releases the Dolby Digital track is hidden, not necessarily a selectable track from the menu. If it wasn't there, and you had an older processor not capable of playing True HD, you wouldn't be able to select the True HD track and get 5.1. It's not a choice in the menu but it's there...

I know from personal experience that at least a couple of the studios, when returning to the original stem elements to create new Printmasters for their Blu-Ray releases (which are often on 6 track mag), are digitizing these elements at 96K 24 bit, cleaning them up and are creating the new...

"Sex, Lies and Vdeotape" is a True HD 96K title on Blu-ray and "Leon the Professional" is a 96K title with DTS-HDM. Both are playable on equipment made in at least the last three years. It's been noted already that new equipment is not going to be necessary for this improved True HD encoding...

The Lionsgate logo on most DTS Lionsgate titles is at 96K as is the Blu-Ray "Leon the Professional" 96K.

I had assumed the preference for DTS HDM over True HD had more to do with the need for an embedded Dolby Digital element as well for backward compatibility - where as DTS HDM uses the extension to a core DTS for the extra quality. So I don't necessarily see this causing a comeback for True HD...