Search results

Sorry Foxy, I was probably not as clear as I intended. Just to be 100% on this - I don't think a Bly-ray Disc in 1080p will look 'massively' better from a 4k scan than from a 2k scan. Yes, they should scan at 4k if possibly for archiving. Yes, when we get a 4k medium (source and display)...

Those quotes from RD & GC are about getting all of the detail off 35mm. They are about how much extra you will see in 1080p from a 4k scan compared to 2k. And even there, I see no use of terms like 'massive'. Steve W

Interesting comments here from Roger Deakins on using the Arri Alexa camera on Skyfall. http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/roger-deakins-skyfall-jgiro.php He thinks it's as good as, or possibly better than 35mm. The AA is 3.5k, by the way. Steve W

Foxy, I'm sure that a transfer taken from a 4k scan give give a slightly better picture than one from a 2k scan. Agreed. But 'far better'? A 'lot of improvement'? Based on the reviews we've seen so far of the recent 'Mastered in 4K' titles, I only see comments about relatively small...

I'm with you Craig. I have both of those, and I don't remember a bad word being said about either of the releases when reviewed on their initial UK Blu-ray Disc release. If by magic the new ones are substantially better, I might consider double dipping, but they first releases look so good...