Search results

See the movie. It really doesn't. Before seeing it, I wouldn't have believed that either. :laugh: I think that anyone that views the movie that way wanted to see a different movie than what was made and/or just really wanted to see their POV onscreen. As for Garland's cowardice (I've seen the...

Since it's a forbidden topic, I'll be delicate here but did anyone see this movie as not particularly political? I mean you can read what you want into a few elements but the way that I saw people crying on Twitter about this movie as if it was some kind of screed against or in favor of X or Y...

I've made peace with the fact that it'll be basically impossible for QT to top Once Upon A Time In Hollywood. The guy hasn't made a dud yet and given how fixated he is on his legacy, I doubt that he'll make a bad or OK movie for his grand finale but topping Once Upon a Time isn't likely in my...

Never say never but I think Garland just needs some time to recharge his creative batteries and he'll be ready to direct again. Or he'll write a movie and end up being irritated or downright angry over a choice that the director makes with the script and that will make him decide it's time to...

How many times has Soderbergh retired or Anthony Hopkins or Daniel Day-Lewis? The only guy that I believe about retirement is Tarantino.

Garland is why all the doubt and mockery of the trailer that I saw on Twitter was senseless to me.

I tend to think that the "California and Texas" thing will be explained in the movie because it's basically impossible that someone did not mention to Garland, if he did not know, that those states would be unlikely allies.

Yeah, that could be it. :laugh:

They forgot to mention Men on the poster.