Search results

See, I have a different view on Bourne's abilities. His fighting abilities are so ingraned in him that most things with him are pure instinct and muscle memory. That was pretty well established in the first film. So, everything flying fast and furious is very consistant with Bourne. He "knows"...

Well, the details, of course. I can kinda understand the annoyance here, because I know I'm normally annoyed when the visuals are obfuscated like this. I know I like to see the details of a fight. But, it is obvious that this isn't the director's point to show great action scenes. The point...

Well, they were Chrystlers, which is now owned by Mercedes, so they weren't really American cars, were they? :) Jason

You must have been watching a different film than I was, since there was certainly more than just action. A lot of the film is Bourne trying to figure out what the hell is going on, and the only people who can tell him are the ones chasing after him. I particularly like all the stuff Bourne...

Super Troopers comes to mind. :D Personally, I thought the movie was great, better than the first one. The only downside is that the ending part is slightly anticlimatic after Brian Cox is taken care of. While the shaky-cam stuff was slightly overdone (you should at least be able to see...

Jeffery Wells also had good things to say about the film, and he rarely does for summer fare. Jason