Search results

I'd like to think people have better things to do with their time, but this thread keeps proving me wrong, so I'm sure someone has. :laugh:

Or maybe they took the line out because they finally realized that Rose was smart and resourceful enough on her own to know which way to go, without Jack telling her.

I suppose one could save up their money and buy themselves a 35mm print from 1997. There's probably still some of those around out there?

Avatar 1 will have 3 different versions of the movie included via branching, so a new encode, but not necessarily a new master.

Yes, but the shot is held longer, and it's in slow motion, so it's much more noticeable.

The blu ray is just extras.

That shot looked absolutely awful in the 2023 IMAX 3D version. Exhibit A in the case for allowing filmmakers to tinker with VFX shots in their old films.

I can't speak for every theater, but the one I saw it in definitely presented it in 2.35. Cameron released Avatar in multiple aspect ratios, so it's entirely possible the same was done for the Titanic re-release.

Getting polarized and overreacting are what the internet is for!

The IMAX 3-D version that came out last February(?) was 2.35:1 ( I was surprised, because based on the previous 3-D release, I was expecting 1.85).