Search results

The majority of films have neither a need, nor business being in 4k. But those that do... RAH

Hopefully, you complained -- loudly, and if things didn't improve, didn't return. Today's theatrical experience, in all but the finest theaters, is virtually worthless. RAH

Zero relationship between the two factors.

It's going to be rough going if people ask their friends which the like better on a 65" panel at seven feet, as it makes virtually no difference. 4k has no viable reason for being on smaller panels. Projection, and by that I mean at least 9-10 foot screen is the only reason for 4k to exist...

Problem is with moving grain, which takes on an appearance similar to that found on the Blu-ray of It's a Wonderful Life. The top machine (I'm told) allows you to shut down noise reduction, but the price is high, and it's not a home theater unit.

4k is an interesting conundrum. While players may be coming, and there are some nice looking flat panels arriving, the main rationale for 4k is projection. And thus far, I've yet to see a moderately priced (15-30k) projector that yields an acceptable image. The Sony machines fail, as (among...