Search results

But it does show how the demand is there...but the industry doesn't care. Not that I didn't know, but the industry's dubious "reasons" for dropping 3D have nothing to do with demand or consumer interest.

You can't (at least going by one demo I saw last year). Without 3D, I consider UHD to be a downgrade. Would you buy a receiver that included DTS but not Dolby Digital? I, for one, won't be buying any display that is not 3D-capable. I don't want to spend my money on a manufacturer that doesn't...

Yes, that is exactly what they want you to do...as long as one of those interests is 4K without 3D. Remember, the industry (ALL arenas) have been actively trying to HIDE the existence of 3D. While every ad for a theatrical releases proclaims "See it in IMAX 3D and RealD 3D!", when the same movie...

People should actually be letting the industry (manufacturers, cable, studios) how they feel. I'd think individual communications probably carry more weight than petitions...but anything is better than a deafening silence. Remember...the home video biz is a pretty clueless bunch.

Rumor has it that the next 3D release from Twilight might be SADIE. Can't verify so take it with a teaspoon of salt.

Isn't the LG OLED65G6P a 2016 model? That has 3D. (I don't know the model numbers of all the new sets) As for Samsung, all that's known is that there have been no new orders to the company that makes the active 3D glasses. For all we know, they could be switching to Passive. One thing we do...

In addition to the Avatar movies, Cameron is also prepping TERMINATOR 2 for 3D.