Search results

I thought it was that at first, but it still looks odd. The lines variably smudge at spots (like on Pan's face or Wendy's hands). Whites of eyes have rough edges. The 2007 has smooth lines and no blown-out whites. I'm tired of arguing, but there's only three possible references for how Peter...

The R2 captures look really weird. It's like there's a Photoshop cutout filter added, making the lines smudgy. Is the R2 2-disc the one with the silent Peter Pan included?

The 2002 is junk and isn't worth any sort of reference. You can't make out the shade of red around the Chief's eyes, the white levels are greyish, and the sky looks too brownish-green. The majority of the Chief's face on the 2002 is closer to pink than the 2007. Also, this post indicates that...

The Indians were not PC-ized into pink: Three shades of red on the face. And here's one of Peter with 4 shades of green:

It's still too saturated. Wendy's lips shouldn't stand out like a neon sign (or like Tinkerbell's glow). I watched the entire film and it looked natural. After seeing that featurete, the clips from the old versions often look too bright. There's some shots inside the nursery that make it seem...

Looking at all the examples, it's pretty obvious that the 2002 used the same 1997 transfer, but added unnecessary edge enhancement, messed with the contrast, and used some DVNR. Someone showed me captures of shots harmed by the noise reduction a while back... in rapid motion, a lot of stuff is...

The 1991 laserdisc looks oversaturated, the 2002 has some really awful sharpening, but the 2007 DVD looks good to my eyes. The colors have a more pastel look. Although, without reference, who knows which is accurate? Tinkerbell loses a lot of glow on the 2002 DVD. The 2007 keeps the effect...