Search results

No 2.00:1 would be correct for a theatrical Japanese presentation

Taken from a Conversation with Allen Daviau (source International Cinematographers Guild) ICG: In the original magazine story, you spoke about lighting in the closet. DAVIAU: So much of the film took place in the closet. Before E.T., Steven had never directed a film in anything but...

Will, Janusz is a fan of “traditional scope” cinematography. His directorial debut “Lost Souls” was intended to be anamorphic. However, plans to film in small places with extremely low light dictated the “alternative” Super 35 route. Minority Report was filmed in Super because Spielberg...

Mr. Palmer, have you ever enjoyed the theatrical presentation of a James Cameron film?

If you two do a search you’ll see that this subject has been debated to death. If you don’t care for the manner in which Stanley’s films are presented by all means don’t purchase them. I support first and foremost the director’s wishes.

John if OAR is that big a deal to you than you should learn everything there is to know about ‘cinematography and composition’ short of going to school.

Gary, have you thought it possible that your position is misguided? Gordon McMurphy, said I hate this quote. I can only assume you fall in this exact category.

You believe this yet I wager you’d make critical exception for Stanley Kubrick.

Prizzi's Honor (1985) [Anchor Bay & MGM - US R1] Filmed in Scope and presented in 1.85 Although, I do not believe the filmmakers ever dictated the OAR transfer.