Search results

That's cool. Also explains why, for example, 24/192 DACs are preferred to 24/96's because of the anti-aliasing filter slopes involved.

Craig- I don't think so. "Oversampling" was the phrase used when CD players first came out. Remember "quadruple oversampling" ? Non-integer multiple is "re-sampling". Happened first in the DAT world. Nobody much uses the phrase "oversampling" any more as delta-sigma and 1-bit DACs made it...

Jeff- Thanks. Good ADCs. Lewis- I hear ya. I have been a skeptic ever since DAT decks added 44.1 kHz to the DAT std of 48 kHz to *avoid* having to resample. But I do recognize that technology moves forward too. But I have also personally seen too many people say that the benfit of upsampling...

Ed- Yes and no. Going from 44.1 to 88.2 or to 176.4 is upsampling. Any time you change the freq itself, it is "re-sampling'. I.e., 44.1 to 48, or 88.2 to 96 or 176.4 to 192. Unfortunately, no matter what anyone says, anytime you do "re-sampling" there is a chance for degredation of the...

Jeff- Ever find out what the analog to digital converters are for the 5.1 analog input? 24/48 or 24/96 I'm guessing.

Jeff- For the 5.1 inputs when you convert to do BM in the digital domain, what resolution are the ADCs?

I saw something about it in one of the two just-out eqp directories: S&V or HT Mag. Says it has BM on the analog inputs. I'd be curious to hear more about that. Does it do an A-to-D conversion? Or analog BM?

Any one know what the chip set is that the Sherwood is based on?