Search results

There was even talk of another kickstarter campaign to try to raise the funds so it doesn't have to come from Mr Williams "on spec" or the 3D-Archive. There are lots of good offers out there but stubbornness seems to be getting in the way.

Admittedly 1.5m$ is a lot of money, however why would MGM not permit restoration if the money came from outside sources and didn't come from them? Am I reading this correctly?

Seriously. I couldn't have said it better. We now know this movie is going NOWHERE because the owner thinks it's worth a hell of a lot more than it really is, and that's really unfortunate.

As will SEPTEMBER STORM! I find this comment disturbing. To me this says the films in your stewardship are nothing more than "property" and you could care less about how they look rather than how much you can make off them. Don't get me wrong, it's your property and you certainly have the...

As would I (and have). However, I don't see this happening unfortunately. Remember too that the distributor as well as the rights owner need to come to mutual agreement on what is a fair price. If one party or the other thinks it is too little or too much, nothing's going to happen...

So, one of the topics at hand is HANNA LEE in 3D, yet that title seems to be purposely being sidestepped. An offer was made to restore it. Perhaps Mr. Williams doesn't think it's a good enough offer. OK, I guess I can appreciate that, however if the title is PD, and it has "little chance" of...

I find it interesting how Mr Williams answered all questions, yet he didn't specifically reply to the 3D-Archive's offer to restore HANNAH LEE at their cost. I don't think you're going to get a better offer than that. Since you're so afraid of not making any money because the film is PD, take...