Search results

Except that he shot the scene like there was a constant acceleration away from each other. They were always in tension like as if there was a headwind, even though they were stopped rleative to each other and the station. She never "bounced" back like there was a spring force in action. It is a...

That was the mistake I noticed the most. I probably could spot more if I was totally familar with orbital mechanics, but the one you pointed out is the one that anyone with even slight familiarity on how objects behave in space would spot.

Don't be ridiculous. My remarks on this can, in no way, be interpreted as Soyuz only puts Americans into space. There are only three countries that have the capacity to put up crewed space missions. The U.S, Russia and, as of 2003, the Chinese. With the retirement of the shuttle, there are now...

Russia still has Soyuz. I guess by "manned lift capacity" I mean the ability to put a man into space. Since retirement of the shuttle the U.S has no means to put a man into space other than to use Russian Soyuz capsules and launch facilities. Or have I missed news about the Russians retiring...

Regarding the ending.

Wow. Fantastic film. I liked this much better than his "Chldren of Men"; Although, I have to credit the cinematography in both films. The cinematography in his films is always impressive. This is the first live action film shot in 3D that really impressed me. Some of the mechanics of motion in...

I wasn't overly impressed with "Children of Men". It was good, but it didn't really floor me. Still, the trailer for this was impressive. I definitely have to go see this.