Search results

Not odd. A forum feature users have reported for nearly two years. http://www.hometheaterforum.com/t/304113/youtube-embed-wonky#post_3748274

dp

Sam, I've long long labored under the impression you were about 30 years younger ;) Of course, you might think I'm a two dimensional cartoon character...

They pay you today, but you can wait a month to send it in? I had no idea Gazelle was so flexible.

What do you do for the next month without a phone?

I'm left still wondering what is it that the S3 has or does that exceeds the iPhone?is it the larger screen? And configuration options?

How? You don't do it by slashing prices and selling at low margins. Laptops show that. Tablets show that.

But how do you make money? We make it in volume -- The International Bank of Change

iPad is 4:3 iPhone is 3:2 Already have a variation in aspect ratio. Taller iPhone would add a third. Also why I like uniformly larger one.

I'm still betting against a taller phone. My bet is, if it's got more pixels, it's larger all around. I'll being watching from the sidelines until next year at least. We've got to get into our new place this Winter, find out how reception is, and the decide if we stay AT&T or switch to Verizon...

I like the bumper, but it doesn't work with my car adapter. So I'm ceaseless for a year now. As for switching to Android...its surprisingly difficult to find info on that phone. Samsung's site gives little info on my iPad, and the tech radar review had a next page link after every paragraph...

I don't use a case or protector. But I'm aware of the reports of cracked phones. And the caseless phone can be a bit slippery.

"If you need a case, you did it wrong" -- what Steve should have said.

In stark contrast to everything I think, the most substantive rumors support the notion of the increased-height notion. http://daringfireball.net/2012/05/bigger_display_iphone_thing_wwdc

Apple has been on a relentless push to increase pixel density on all its devices. First the iPhone, then the iPad, and next -- per rumors -- the MacBook Air or Pro line. It seems very unlikely Apple will next decrease the pixel density of its next phone. I think this is actually the least likely...

They will spin it as MOAR MONEY$$$!!! That's my guess :)

Instapaper does, according to its developer. (I don't use the app, but I enjoy Marco's blog and podcast) What about games? Infinity Blade II? But on the iPhone: it's already "Retina", and apps support the double res. If it gets a larger screen, I see that as a "bigger screen" thing than a...

Apple's selling a $500 device with a 2048 x 1536 screen. If they want a 25% larger iPhone, I predict they can make it with 1200 x 800 pixels, rather than making it lower density, and not have to retcon marketing.

I'm going to start a rumor that Apple's going to get into the ISP business too, so they can make money off of our WiFi use of our iOS devices! Huge profit maker!

I've got a consistent habit of: iPhone in left pocket, keys in right pocket. That's kept me safe from scratching so far. I used screen protectors with my Palm PDAs,and have been more than glad to not have them with the change to the iPhone. But others should chime in with suggestions; I...

http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/04/liquid-metal-next-iphone/ Because what people have been clamoring for is a slippier, easier to drop iPhone.

It's not whether 4" 960 x 640 screen would look good, it's whether Apple would ship such a screen given their emphasis on "Retina Display" and >300 ppi on the iPhone. I don't see Apple going backwards on resolution. We'll know for real this Fall (another prediction ;)

Bigger pixels is a bad solution. Apple won't do it (my prediction). The article is reasonable. But my opinion is that if Apple releases a larger phone it will be a 4.375" screen with 1200 x 800. Same pixel pitch, same screen aspect ratio, but 25% larger on each side.

Regarding larger size: I'm OK with the current 3.5" iPhone. It feels good. If it's Lumia'd style, getting worse to get bigger (4.5" 800x480 screen), then no. If it's a stretch-armstronged iPhone 4S (4.5" 960x640 screen), then no. If it's Androided, iPhone 4S at 4.5" 1280x800, but has...

Speculation is fun. I was thinking it was time to start the speculation of the new iPhone (because that's what I think the name will be) and iOS6. What puts me off here? I think we -- I think I -- deserve better than LINK-BAIT! thread titles.

I don't understand the rumor or this thread. "Dud" is perforative term implying the device is a significant failure, deeply disappointing, that it will not sell, that few people will be interested. Examples: Blackberry Storm was a dud Palm Pre HP Palm tablet...

I didn't upgrade from 4 to 4S. So the 4S is a dud?

I mean a dud that more and more people keep buying, making Apple the "largest" company in the US. Why would I upgrade from my iPhone 4? Isn't it obvious? Faster processor (A5x vs A4). 4G vs 3G. Siri. Better Camera. Two-year renewal pricing. How is this a "dud"?

A dud like the iPhone 4S? Or a dud like the new iPad? Either way, I hope to upgrade this cycle