Search results

  1. DaveF

    Tax Season Blues

    I agree no one is going to "win" this argument. But I was hoping you could cogently explain how your concept does not directly tie voting rights to income. I understand the appeal of your idea: Let those funding the work determine the work. I just find it in complete conflict with our...
  2. DaveF

    Tax Season Blues

    :emoji_thumbsup: I'm with ya on this one. :) Moreover, it would be better finances: If I could keep my taxes throughout the year, invested and earning interest/dividends, I'd have even more cash even after paying the IRS... But still, taxes are apparent: each week I get a paystub with it...
  3. DaveF

    Tax Season Blues

    As I explained earlier, this doesn't make any practical sense to me. Higher income results in higher tax rates in our progressive tax system. If you want a flat tax system, advocate it; this is the wrong method to get there, IMO. And as for people purposefully adjusting their tax rates to get...
  4. DaveF

    Tax Season Blues

    Ok, you're tying voting to income. The more a person earns, the more they will pay in taxes and the more voting power they have. (Unless you mean that a person can choose their tax rate to select their voting power. But that's meaningless -- the rich could/would pay more to get more votes.)...
  5. DaveF

    Tax Season Blues

    I tend to agree here -- though conventional wisdom is that the super wealthy avoid more than their fair share of taxes. My experience as a full-time employee suggests (frustrating) areas where I pay more (in absolute dollars) of the socialistic burden than those who make 5x+ my salary. I...
  6. DaveF

    Tax Season Blues

    I guess I don't understand your position. Marginal Tax rate is tantamount to wealth. And allocating votes according to wealth ties one's measure of citizenship to wealth. I suppose one could imagine a world where the poor pay a higher marginal rate than the wealthy to get more votes -- but...
  7. DaveF

    Tax Season Blues

    This is an interesting sentiment, but arguably incorrect based on what I've read. The ultra-wealthy have long given very large sums charitably -- though often post-humously. But proportionally, the middle and upper middle class are fairly stingy, giving away rather low percentages of their...
Top