Search results

Well here's the quote...you draw your own interpretations.

That was basically the point Greg. Now I can see returning something in those instances where due to unforseen financial matters, the purchase has become a burden. Like some here, its the intent that matters to me. I've got no idea what Secret's cash flow is and how they work the books. There...

Like in CrackerJacks.

Its one of those things that I wished I hadn't read on their website. Just leaves me with a bad taste.

OK, now for where I'm going with this but first, my general opinions on buying something without the intent of eventually owning it. In a sense, this is like a rephrasing of the old question, "Do the ends justify the means?" I personally don't like it. I think its unethical. It drives up the...

Well damn Michael, weigh in with your thoughts on this!

Understand, anyone whose reading this thread, that the person who is doing the buying, has absolutely no intention whatsoever - none - of buying the device for the purposes of owning it. He's going to buy it. Do whatever it is he's going to do with it. Then return it. As to where I'm going with...

Any problems with the ethics of it? The item is no longer new but must be sold as used.

about the thought of going from store to store, buying amps, dvd players, or whatever...using them for whatever purpose and then returning each and everyone within the store's grace period? Are there situations where this is indeed justifiable?