Search results

I read the article. Notice how there is zip for information in regards to those other "sources". How about this one from the BBC then; http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4780391.stm - source is an explosives expert. Go google the whole deal, there is plenty of other information...

Pan-Am 103 over Lockerbie would be an excellent example, granted it was a Semtex explosion, but the hole that it blew out the side of the plane would have been survivable all by itself, however the shockwave it sent through the plane ripped the skin of the plane off in many places including...

Terrorists have been using "liquid" explosives for quite some time, I'm sure we all have heard about the subway/bus bombings in London not to long ago, Phillipine Air 434 was a test run for a similiar plot 10+ years ago, etc. It's not difficult to create it, granted the chemicals used aren't...

I'd say it's a bit of both. I lock the doors of my house when I'm away (and when I'm home) despite the fact that there are thousands of cops in the area doing police work and investigations and such. Imagine if there were no security at all at the airport, what do you think will happen...

A friend just got back from a flight that went through Heathrow, they were allowed to buy a book/magazine once they were "inside" the security area, but they would have to provide a receipt for it while boarding the plane.