Search results

Precisely! But the fundamentalists would rather stick by the word of Vitali than look at the evidence of SK's own instructions to his cameraman, as shown in the Kubrick Archives:- "COMPOSE for 1.85:1, PROTECT for 1.33:1" (in relation to The Shining.) If both versions are available it would...

(...through gritted teeth...) The director in this case never voiced an opinion on the matter because the technology was in its infancy, in commercial and availability terms, when he died. Do you really, honestly think Stanley Kubrick would have wanted us to view Barry Lyndon in a small...

Have been reading the Vitali interview in full, and I notice his answer to the following question: Reads to me like he's dodging, or doesn't fully appreciate, the question. We know the mattes will be down the side! But at present, on my 16:9 TV, there are black bars down both sides AND top...

The film was projected at 1.85:1 in the cinema and I thought it looked beautiful. I just want to see that on my widescreen TV without loss of resolution caused by zooming. If you think that's a betrayal of Kubrick's wishes to the extent that I should be denied it forever, then we'll just have to...

None of this is relevant. The films were presented theatrically at 1.85:1 and composed to cater for that. So we should be given the opportunity to watch them at that size, without black bars down the two sides for ever more! Those who insist on sticking to 4:3 versions - you already have what...

Correction - just double-checked it properly! It's the scene where Dave and Frank are transferring from the centrifuge into the shaft down to the pod area, where they appear to be spinning round.

I bought it from Amazon UK last week, and it still has the film strip. Mine is from the scene where the stewardess does the 180° walk up the wall. :)