Walt's Lady and the Tramp is still a miraculous, gorgeous animated entertainment, but on screen, without it's proper, or at least a small replaced sheen of film grain, it's deader than a doornail. 4 Stars

I’ve been trying with the Disney animated classics.

Trying to like the new Blu-rays.

I really have.

I’ve even reviewed them well, hoping for something to change.

For about a decade, I’ve been forgiving them their exigencies, as they try to get films that shouldn’t look like Toy Story to be precisely that.

Digital animation.

The worst, for me, was Snow White, a little 1937 film, that had some sequences (think Snow and the Huntsman) so horrific, that they looked like stagnant, post card images, with parts of cells frozen in time, with not a single bit of film grain to create the magic of a cohesive image.

Disney(‘s) new Blu-ray of this glorious 1955 film, while a bit better than Snow White, similarly removes the magic of motion, and the natural patina of film grain, that made these films what there were.

There are two sides to this debate.

There are those who will tell you that this isn’t really a film at all.

Never was.

They’re all drawn cells. Photographed to create the illusion of movement.

But that’s what film is.

Nothing moves, as we move from frame to frame. It’s all just a long (very long) strip of fillum.

And that film grain was merely something that was a necessity toward creating a means of replicating, and getting these films on to motion picture screens.

Remember, these films were shot on black & white film, which was then used to produce printing matrices, all of which had grain.

You can’t ship hundreds of multi-plane flip-books.

And, of course, this is correct.

The films are created from cells, and photographed to create an illusion.

But that’s not the way that they were originally seen, and the removal of the original film grain (at least for me) destroys that overriding cohesiveness that binds the cells together, and allows us to believe that they’re moving.

The latest incarnation seems to be a bit more cleaned up than the previous release (the Diamond Edition), and it’s now playable on every device that Walt never imagined, possibly down to one’s Apple Watch.

Let’s also be very honest about this.

There are a couple of very separate audiences involved.

Kids won’t give a damn about film grain, and those under two will probably just drool, and smile at the pretty “oof-oof” faces, or whatever they call them.

But to those of us who grew up with these films, and understand the art of cinema, it’s become more than troubling. With all due respect to Disney management, and they’re a great company, I was hopeful that when one of the top animation execs took a leave, or whatever, that things might change, but it appears not.

Walt’s company seems to be set in their ways, and I in mine.

I can no longer excuse their desires to make everything shiny and new, and drool-worthy for tots.

Make no mistake.

Walt’s Lady and the Tramp is still a miraculous, gorgeous animated entertainment, but on screen, without it’s proper, or at least a small replaced sheen of film grain, it’s deader than a doornail.

What may be necessary here, (and please, no 4k releases) are two versions, on the same Blu-ray disc. 2.55, 76 minutes = no problem.

One modernized and beloved by drooling tots, and some studio execs, and the other for dotty, old fans of the cinema.

Image – 2

Audio – 5 (DTS-HD MA 7.1)

Pass / Fail – Fail

Upgrade from previous Blu-ray – No

RAH

Published by

Robert Harris

editor,member

Rick Thompson

Screenwriter
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
1,635
Reaction score
990
Points
1,610
Absolutely right. The hand-drawn animation was glorious, the detail incredible. Computer animation not so much. The last Disney film I really enjoyed was Aladdin. The computer animation look is, well, antiseptic, untouched by human hands.
 

benbess

Producer
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
4,005
Reaction score
2,373
Points
4,110
Real Name
Ben
Was there also a 1.33 version of this film made? If so, has anyone seen it in the last few decades? Imho that should have been included as a bonus feature. But I also agree these movies should look like animated movies on film, not almost as if they were digital animation....
 

alter filmnarr

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
73
Reaction score
29
Points
10
Real Name
Gerhard
Personally I was spoiled all the time about that topic, and so it came, that I have bought the BDs, but somehow avoided to watch them (after the wacky "Snow White" experience).
What would be Your suggestion Mr. Harris? Would it be the best, trying to find the old DVD sets again? And: which ones? Platinum,"special collection" etc.? Any "plan B"?? :D
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
12,815
Reaction score
16,528
Points
9,110
Real Name
Robert Harris
Personally I was spoiled all the time about that topic, and so it came, that I have bought the BDs, but somehow avoided to watch them (after the wacky "Snow White" experience).
What would be Your suggestion Mr. Harris? Would it be the best, trying to find the old DVD sets again? And: which ones? Platinum,"special collection" etc.? Any "plan B"?? :D
Don’t remove the grain. Simply soften the image very slightly to replicate the look and texture of the original prints. Keep in mind that the SE negs were a bit grainy, and grain was reduced in the dye transfer printing process.

That’s the easy part.

The difficulty is the corporate mindset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF and Gary16

richardburton84

Second Unit
Joined
Sep 4, 2011
Messages
317
Reaction score
386
Points
110
Real Name
Jack
Was there also a 1.33 version of this film made? If so, has anyone seen it in the last few decades? Imho that should have been included as a bonus feature. But I also agree these movies should look like animated movies on film, not almost as if they were digital animation....
There was indeed an Academy Ratio version of Lady. This version was released in the 90’s on VHS and Laserdisc along with the CinemaScope version (I know because I have that VHS and the fact that this VHS is the Academy Ratio version is the primary reason I’m holding onto it, along with the 90’s Fantasia tape with Deems Taylor’s actual voice and a more accurate approximation of the original Fantasound mix).
 
  • Like
Reactions: benbess

atcolomb

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 19, 2009
Messages
1,803
Reaction score
1,580
Points
1,610
Location
Chicago Area
Real Name
Angelo
One of the very few Disney films that I have not seen so if my local library gets it I will check it out. I hope Disney gets around to releasing The Black Hole on Blu-ray.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benbess

alter filmnarr

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
73
Reaction score
29
Points
10
Real Name
Gerhard
Don’t remove the grain. Simply soften the image very slightly to replicate the look and texture of the original prints. Keep in mind that the SE negs were a bit grainy, and grain was reduced in the dye transfer printing process.

That’s the easy part.

The difficulty is the corporate mindset.
...yes, that would be nice, but how to watch the movies until then in Your opinion?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Interdimensional

Gary16

Screenwriter
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
1,792
Points
1,610
Real Name
Gary
Was there also a 1.33 version of this film made? If so, has anyone seen it in the last few decades? Imho that should have been included as a bonus feature. But I also agree these movies should look like animated movies on film, not almost as if they were digital animation....
Yes. I have the laserdisc with both versions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benbess

benbess

Producer
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
4,005
Reaction score
2,373
Points
4,110
Real Name
Ben
Yes. I have the laserdisc with both versions.
How much do they differ? I guess what a mean to say, is did they draw different cells for the two different versions?
 

Gary16

Screenwriter
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
1,792
Points
1,610
Real Name
Gary
How much do they differ? I guess what a mean to say, is did they draw different cells for the two different versions?
They recomposed certain scenes to fit. For example when those three dogs are walking toward the camera. In the 4:3 version they’re much closer together to fit in the frame. Someone posted comparison shots quite a while back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benbess

richardburton84

Second Unit
Joined
Sep 4, 2011
Messages
317
Reaction score
386
Points
110
Real Name
Jack
They recomposed certain scenes to fit. For example when those three dogs are walking toward the camera. In the 4:3 version they’re much closer together to fit in the frame. Someone posted comparison shots quite a while back.
There’s also a difference in one scene between the two versions that’s not related to framing. In the scene where the Tramp first sees Lady, the Academy Ratio version starts with a wide-angle shot but then zooms into a close-up of Lady, indicating his interest in Lady. By contrast, the CinemaScope version stays on the wide-angle shot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benbess

alter filmnarr

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
73
Reaction score
29
Points
10
Real Name
Gerhard
Personally I was spoiled all the time about that topic, and so it came, that I have bought the BDs, but somehow avoided to watch them (after the wacky "Snow White" experience).
What would be Your suggestion Mr. Harris? Would it be the best, trying to find the old DVD sets again? And: which ones? Platinum,"special collection" etc.? Any "plan B"?? :D
Yes, but that was my question at the beginning. Are the DVDs really better than the BDs and especially: which ones? Only the first editions or the later ones as well? To be honest, I gave away some of them, and I am curious, if it pays off to buy them back again or to stay with the less than stellar BDs... For the Moment I'm in the strange situation, that I hesitate to watch them at all.

Please, excuse my faulty English, coming from Vienna/Austria...
 
Last edited:

JoeDoakes

Cinematographer
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
2,923
Reaction score
1,124
Points
4,110
Real Name
Ray
Does anyone happen to know when the current approach of Disney to their animated classics began? I think people were happy with the 2008 blu-ray release of Sleeping Beauty, but by the 2014 release things had gone wrong. This is the chronology of the Disney blu releases: http://disney.wikia.com/wiki/Disney_Blu-ray
 

Tony Bensley

Producer
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
6,066
Reaction score
3,626
Points
9,110
Location
Somewhere in Canada
Real Name
Anthony
Does anyone happen to know when the current approach of Disney to their animated classics began? I think people were happy with the 2008 blu-ray release of Sleeping Beauty, but by the 2014 release things had gone wrong. This is the chronology of the Disney blu releases: http://disney.wikia.com/wiki/Disney_Blu-ray
And what of the 2009 SNOW WHITE AND THE 7 DWARFS Blu-ray, as opposed to the 2016 Signature release? Also, is the '01 DVD edition better than both, in terms of the original look?

CHEERS! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: alter filmnarr

RolandL

Producer
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Messages
5,095
Reaction score
2,440
Points
9,110
Age
68
Location
Cromwell, CT
Real Name
Roland Lataille
Found these on other sites. Notice how the 1.33 version has more picture info on the top and bottom than the 2.55.

ladytramp-05.JPG


latt03.jpg
latt04.jpg
 
Last edited: