You’ll wish they had a better script 3.5 Stars

The often-delayed sequel Wonder Woman 1984 arrives on 4K UHD Blu-ray after its brief HBOMax and theatrical run, with director Patty Jenkins and star Gal Gadot returning.

Wonder Woman 1984 (2020)
Released: 25 Dec 2020
Rated: PG-13
Runtime: 151 min
Director: Patty Jenkins
Genre: Action, Adventure, Fantasy
Cast: Gal Gadot, Chris Pine, Kristen Wiig, Pedro Pascal
Writer(s): Patty Jenkins (story by), Geoff Johns (story by), Patty Jenkins (screenplay by), Geoff Johns (screenplay by), Dave Callaham (screenplay by), William Moulton Marston (based on characters from DC Wonder Woman created by)
Plot: Diana must contend with a work colleague and businessman, whose desire for extreme wealth sends the world down a path of destruction, after an ancient artifact that grants wishes goes missing.
IMDB rating: 5.4
MetaScore: 60

Disc Information
Studio: Warner Brothers
Distributed By: N/A
Video Resolution: 2160p HEVC w/HDR
Aspect Ratio: 2.39.1
Audio: Dolby Atmos, English 5.1 DD, English Descriptive Audio, Spanish 5.1 DD, French 5.1 DD
Subtitles: English SDH, Spanish, French
Rating: PG-13
Run Time: 2 Hr. 31 Min.
Package Includes: UHD, Blu-ray, Digital Copy
Case Type: 2-disc UHD eco keepcase with slipcover
Disc Type: UHD
Region: All
Release Date: 03/30/2021
MSRP: $44.95

The Production: 2.5/5

I was a major fan of 2017’s Wonder Woman, and had been looking forward to its sequel, Wonder Woman 1984, so much so that I used the two week free trial code that came with my 4K UHD Blu-ray copy of The Goonies to watch it on HBOMax over the Christmas holidays. I am glad I was able to use the free trial to watch it, along with several other movies I had been wanting to watch, to get my money’s worth out of that trial. I say that because Wonder Woman 1984 was a bit of a letdown.

It is the year 1984 in our nation’s capitol, and Diana Prince (Gal Gadot) is working at the Smithsonian in the antiquities department, as her alter-ego Wonder Woman battles crime and saves citizens, both on the busy streets and in a major shopping mall. The jewelry heist that she stops in the mall turns out to be a black market shop for stolen antiquities, and the confiscated goods end up (surprise) at the Smithsonian for newcomer Barbara Minerva (Kristen Wiig), a rather mousy and forgettable yet highly intelligent individual. Diana and Barbara quickly become friends, but when they discover that one of the artifacts is actually a legendary wishing stone, they both unknowingly wish for something they long for. Diana wishes for her true love Steve Trevor (Chris Pine), who sacrificed himself at the end of the first film, to return. Barbara wishes to be more like Diana. The next day, Barbara awakens to find men being attracted to her, including con artist Maxwell Lord (Pedro Pascal), who wants the wishing stone to himself. Barbara is so enamored to have what appears to be a wealthy, charming, and attractive man pay attention to her that she allows Lord to “borrow” the stone. That evening, Diana gets a surprise visit from a gentleman whom she eventually recognizes as her Steve, and when they awaken together the next morning, decide to investigate how this all happened and what has happened to the stone: Max Lord has made his one wish – to become the wishing stone himself and thus begins his thirst for control of everything by granting wishes but taking something back in return. And that is the curse of the wising stone, which has destroyed countless civilizations over the years, and Max Lord is on a path to destroy the world while Diana loses her powers and Barbara turns into a much darker soul.

There are so many things wrong with Wonder Woman 1984, which is hard to believe considering how much director Patty Jenkins reportedly fought with studio executives to even be considered being hired for the sequel. Much of the blame, though, goes to the script (which Jenkins co-wrote with Geoff Johns and Dave Callaham), which is often unfocused, going places it didn’t have to (Steve Trevor taking over an innocent man’s body with Diana willfully going along with it), forgetting key character plot points of the prior film in the opening prologue flashback (a young Diana competes in a triathlon while her mother looks on with pride, despite the fact her mother forbid any training or competing until she was much older in the first film), and two rather dull villains. Gal Gadot is terrific as Diana/WonderWoman, Chris Pine has some fun moments as Steve, Kristen Wiig does make a convincing transition from mousy to menacing, and Pedro Pascal is fine as the scene-chewing con man Max. But the movie on a whole is overly long (151 minutes) and for me has this bad Superman III vibe, and I really do mean that in a bad way. The only thing I can think of is that perhaps Jenkins was trying to emulate super hero movies from the mid 1980s?

Video: 5/5

3D Rating: NA

Wonder Woman 1984, according to IMDB, was captured by various means, utilizing 65mm for the opening and closing IMAX sequences, 35mm using the Super 35 process for most of the film, with additional sequences shot in Panavision Super 70, and digitally in 3.4K and 6.5K resolution on Arri Alexa 65 and XT cameras, then completed as a 4K digital intermediate in the 2.39:1 aspect ratio (except for IMAX sequences, which appear on this disc in the 1.9:1 aspect ratio). My first two screenings of this film were on the HBOMax streaming service back in December of last year, and although they were supposedly in 4K, there was a lot of noticeable compression artifacts. I am happy to say that is not the case with Warner’s 2160p HEVC-encoded transfer on this disc, which includes Dolby Vision, HDR10+, and HDR10 high dynamic range options. This is a highly detailed transfer, from fabric textures, facial features, the shimmering of Wonder Woman’s main costume and her gold armor. Colors are vivid and 1980s hyper-real. Black levels are excellent, with deep shadow details particularly during the battle sequence between Wonder Woman and Cheetah. To top it all off, there were no compression artifacts or banding issues.

Audio: 5/5

The default Dolby Atmos track is thrilling and very demo-worthy. From the moment the film begins, the viewer is immersed in sound from all directions during the opening prologue on Themyscira through the to the Christmas-set epilogue and mid-credit sequence. Surrounds and heights are pretty much active throughout, allowing sounds to travel seamlessly around the room. LFE is strong throughout, adding emphasis to crashes and explosions without being too boomy. Hans Zimmer’s score is clear and recognizable throughout, as is dialogue. For some odd reason, Warner has included a lossy Dolby Digital 5.1 mix as well.

Special Features: 3.5/5

As is typical of Warner 4K releases, the UHD disc is movie-only, while all of the special features can be found on the Blu-ray disc.

The Making of “Wonder Woman 1984:” Expanding the Wonder (1080p; 36:23): A fairly in-depth look at the making of the film, including interviews with key members of the cast and crew.

Gal & Kristen: Friends Forever (1080p; 5:10): Gal Gadot and Kristen Wiig discuss their charactersd as well as the off-screen friendship.

Small But Mighty (1080p; 10:44): A look at the opening prologue sequence.

Scene Study: The Open Road (1080p; 6:11): A behind the scenes look at the Egyptian truck chase sequence.

Scene Study: The Mall (1080p; 5:03): A behind the scenes look at the opening mall sequence.

Gal & Krissy Having Fun (1080p; 1:12): Gal Gadot and Kristen Wiig goof off behind the scenes.

Meet the Amazons (1080p; 21:28): Tiffany Smith moderates a virtual discussion panel with director Patty Jenkins, actress Lily Aspell, costume designer Lindy Hemming, production designer Aline Bonetto, and the actresses who played many of the Amazons in the opening sequence.

Black Gold Infomercial (1080p; 1:38): The full infomercial from the movie, intentionally upscaled from a standard definition source.

Gag Reel (1080p; 6:26)

“Wonder Woman 1984” Retro Remix (1080p; 1:36): A fun re-creation of the opening credits sequence from the classic 1980s TV show using clips from Wonder Woman 1984.

Digital Copy: An insert contains a code to redeem a digital copy in UHD on Movies Anywhere. For those who are wondering, the IMAX sequences appear on the digital version in the 1.9:1 aspect ratio.

Overall: 3.5/5

Wonder Woman 1984 was a major disappointment, yet not quite the misstep to derail the franchise entirely. Considering the several release date changes made even before the pandemic, one has to wonder (no pun intended) if Warner knew they had a turkey on their hands.

Post Disclaimer

Some of our content may contain marketing links, which means we will receive a commission for purchases made via those links. In our editorial content, these affiliate links appear automatically, and our editorial teams are not influenced by our affiliate partnerships. We work with several providers (currently Skimlinks and Amazon) to manage our affiliate relationships. You can find out more about their services by visiting their sites.

Published by

Todd Erwin

editor,member

Dave Moritz

Premium
Joined
Jul 7, 2001
Messages
8,247
Location
California
Real Name
Dave Moritz
I also really enjoyed the 2017 Wonder Woman so I purchased it on 4K blu-ray. But after seeing Wonder Woman 1984 on HBO Max and being really disappointed in it I will not be adding it to my collection! I disliked it to the point that I will not even give it a second viewing. The 4K transfer looks great and sounds good but the story line and how Wonder Woman is portrayed is just horrible.
 

noel aguirre

Premium
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
881
Location
New York City
Real Name
noel
My the DC world is one flop after the other (unlike Marvel's) yet these fiascos keep getting bankrolled.

Having said that my 3D version arrived yesterday from Amazon as I'm in for anything released in 3D.
And it's also released in Atmos.
 

dpippel

Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems
Premium
Joined
Feb 24, 2000
Messages
9,851
Location
Sonora Norte
Real Name
Doug
To be fair, the first Wonder Woman was (outside of The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Returns) DC's most successful film, and was critically well received. It's no, um, "wonder" that a sequel got the green light and was bankrolled. It's just a shame that the second movie was so bad. Consistency is NOT DC's area of expertise.
 
Last edited:

dpippel

Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems
Premium
Joined
Feb 24, 2000
Messages
9,851
Location
Sonora Norte
Real Name
Doug
I felt the same way about Gadot when her casting was announced, but she completely vindicated herself in the role. She's perfect as WW IMO, even though I thought the tone of the character in WW84 was off-kilter.
 

Malcolm R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2002
Messages
19,653
Real Name
Malcolm
To be fair, the first Wonder Woman was (outside of The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Returns) DC's most successful film...
Only by looking at the domestic gross. Aquaman is by far DC's biggest film worldwide (nearly $1.15 Billion), followed by Batman vs. Superman ($874 million), then Wonder Woman ($821 million) and Suicide Squad ($746 million).
 

Todd Erwin

Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
6,670
Location
Hawthorne, NV
Real Name
Todd Erwin
Consistency is NOT DC's area of expertise.
I disagree. The individual character films are progressively worse.

Man of Steel -> Batman v Superman -> Justice League (Theatrical)

Batman v Superman -> Suicide Squad -> Justice League (Theatrical)

Wonder Woman -> Wonder Woman 1984

We'll have to wait and see with The Suicide Squad and Aquaman 2.
 

Bryan^H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
7,723
I felt the same way about Gadot when her casting was announced, but she completely vindicated herself in the role. She's perfect as WW IMO, even though I thought the tone of the character in WW84 was off-kilter.
She did great in this one. I thought some of the small moments in the film gave me more empathy, and love for the character than all of her scenes in the entire first film combined.
 

Bryan^H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
7,723
I disagree. The individual character films are progressively worse.

Man of Steel -> Batman v Superman -> Justice League (Theatrical)

Batman v Superman -> Suicide Squad -> Justice League (Theatrical)

Wonder Woman -> Wonder Woman 1984

We'll have to wait and see with The Suicide Squad and Aquaman 2.
I think Aquaman 2 will have lot to live up to. I think the first film was simply perfect.
 

john a hunter

Screenwriter
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
1,433
Citizen Kane is perfect. So is 2001, And Lawrence of Arabia.
Aquaman really ??
It shouldn't be mentioned in the same breath.
 

TravisR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
36,977
Location
The basement of the FBI building
Citizen Kane is perfect. So is 2001, And Lawrence of Arabia.
Aquaman really ??
It shouldn't be mentioned in the same breath.
I don't want to put words in Bryan's mouth but I took it to mean that he sees Aquaman as a perfect piece of entertainment. I love Star Wars or Halloween or a ton of movies far more than 2001 but I know 2001 is a better movie.
 

Carlo Medina

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 31, 1997
Messages
12,305
This was a movie that I enjoyed, but could very easily understand why others didn't. And even though I enjoyed it, there are quite a few flaws I took issue with.

I think the main one is trying to shoehorn in as much humor as possible, especially in the front half of the film. It's like DC saw the success of Thor: Ragnarok and the subsequent humor of "Fat Thor" in Endgame, and said "ah ha, that's what we've been missing, humor!" There is well documented testimony that the "amp up the humor" notes were being passed to Snyder, and subsequently to Whedon, on Justice League...and we all know how that went.

The tale of the monkey's paw, and the temptation to obtain your deepest desire at a most precious personal cost, is a powerful one and should be sufficient to carry a film without trying to input as many gags as one can fit. Let the humor come naturally. There's built-in "man out of time" humor to exploit as well, no need to try and cram extraneous humor (which didn't come across all that funny) into it. The monkey's paw, lost love regained, are all strong story points and should have been front and center the entire time, with sparse but well timed bits of levity sprinkled throughout.

I remember my first Max viewing, feeling conflicted after I watched it, because there's such a dissonance between the forced comedy and the more serious aspects of the film, I wasn't sure how I'd feel watching it a second time (and owning it on disc). I was pleasantly surprised to find that I enjoyed it more on the second viewing now that I knew what I was in store for. I wouldn't say it's a great film. Maybe not even a good film, if you are judging it on its storytelling merits, but it was enjoyable enough that I sat through another 151 minutes and didn't regret it. My grading of the movie would be a 3/5.

I will say that despite having a pretty robust internet connection, I did find the 4K UHD presentation to be superior to what I recall from the Max streaming version. The Max version was fine most of the time but it really did struggle in the dark scenes, especially during WW and Cheetah's fight (not quite on par with the infamous GoT dark issue on one of their last episodes, but it didn't look good). I vividly recall watching that scene and thinking "I have to take this all in and remember how mediocre it looks for when I eventually get the disc version" and sure enough, the disc does that scene justice (the whole movie, in fact). And the audio was on-point. So my A/V scores would mirror Todd's 5 and 5.

Just my opinions.
 

noel aguirre

Premium
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
881
Location
New York City
Real Name
noel
I thought Gal Gadot was ok as WW, she has charm. But who could measure up to Lynda Carter. Same with Superman, everyone is in the shadow of Chris Reeve.
Bingo- they are iconic. And OK just doesn’t cut it. Only Michelle Pfeiffer was able to really notch out a truly memorable DC performance as Catwoman and appearing in only one film. The other DC actors are either ok, laughably bad, or just boring.
 

Robert Crawford

Crawdaddy
Moderator
Patron
Joined
Dec 9, 1998
Messages
52,359
Location
Michigan
Real Name
Robert
Bingo- they are iconic. And OK just doesn’t cut it. Only Michelle Pfeiffer was able to really notch out a truly memorable DC performance as Catwoman and appearing in only one film. The other DC actors are either ok, laughably bad, or just boring.
You mean Danny DeVito as The Penguin, didn't float your boat?;)