Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt.2 has been voted the best Harry Potter film by both users and critics of Rotten Tomatoes, with a combined rating of 93%. Critics gave the movie a 96% score, while fans gave it a 89% rating.

In second place, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban received an average rating of 88%, while Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone and Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets both scored 82%. According to National Holidays who compiled the data, there isn’t much disagreement when it comes to the least favored movie. The Fantastic Beasts sequel plummeted to the bottom of the pile, with Crimes of Grindewald scoring just 37% from critics and 55% from fans.

The Harry Potter Films, ranked in order of ratings:

Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows Pt. 2
Harry Potter & the Prisoner of Azkaban
Harry Potter & the Philosopher’s Stone
Harry Potter & the Chamber of Secrets
Harry Potter & the Goblet of Fire
Harry Potter & the Half Blood Prince
Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows Pt. 1
Harry Potter & the Order of the Phoenix
Fantastic Beasts & Where to Find Them
Fantastic Beasts: Crimes of Grindelwald

Although voted the least favourite films, both of the Fantastic Beasts releases had budgets of £200,000,000,  making them amongst the most expensive movies ever to be released. On the flip side, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets had the lowest budget and proved to be the most profitable, making £778,979,634 ROI.

If you’re a big fan of the franchise, you can look at the full data here, and see how many spells were cast, the number of magical creatures and items, along with the number of magical terms used in each of the 10 movies. Apparently Harry Potter and Deathly Hallows Pt. 2 contains the most magic overall, with 80 magical creatures and 100 wands appearing throughout the movie.

 

Published by

Martin Dew

editor

Wayne_j

Producer
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Messages
3,348
Reaction score
1,699
Points
4,110
Real Name
Wayne
Prisoner of Azkaban is the best film but is one of my least favorites (due to adaptation issues). My favorite Potter film is Sorcerer's Stone.
 

sidburyjr

Second Unit
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
407
Reaction score
87
Points
110
Age
77
Location
Mount Pleasant, SC
Real Name
Dick Sidbury
Prisoner is my favorite book and probably my favorite movie. I really like Sorcerer’s Stone because of the age of the young wizards. In general I prefer the movies to the books because in the books Harry seems too often to be a whiny brat. I did prefer Deathly Hallows book to the movies. I didn’t see either of the Fantastic Beasts movies at the theater but did buy the disks (Black Friday). I finally got around to seeing Crimes of Grindelwald last week and think it might have killed the third installment. At least Fantastic Beasts (1) was better than the book :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darby67

Mikael Soderholm

Supporting Actor
Joined
Apr 5, 1999
Messages
799
Reaction score
244
Points
610
Location
Stockholm, SWEDEN
Real Name
Mikael Söderholm
Always had a soft spot for Chamber Of Secrets, but as the series continued, I got more bored, and only watched the last installments to see the whole thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darby67

Tino

Executive Producer
Premium
Joined
Apr 19, 1999
Messages
17,725
Reaction score
9,200
Points
9,110
Age
57
Location
Metro NYC
Real Name
Valentino
I can say Half Blood Prince was my favorite book. As for the films I loved them all. Tough to pick a favorite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darby67

Josh Steinberg

Executive Producer
Reviewer
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
18,411
Reaction score
22,799
Points
9,110
Age
37
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
They maintained such a high level of consistency and quality that it’s really tough to pick one. They’re all parts of a whole.

But I think special consideration has to be given to the first film. If that movie doesn’t come out right and please both an eager fan base of readers and a much wider new group of moviegoers, there is no franchise. The first film not only told a compelling story but also credibly suggested an entire world of stories that was worth revisiting.

Especially in this day and age of remakes and reboots and sequels, all building off prior works, there’s something to be said for a film good enough to start a film franchise. The books are very good and very popular, but succeeding as a crossover general audience event was never a guarantee and the path the first film charted for the series is quite an achievement.
 

Colin Jacobson

Lead Actor
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,743
Reaction score
3,490
Points
9,110
I thought the movies got better as they went, partly because Radcliffe really developed as an actor.

He was bland in the first few but eventually matured and became a strength.

Watson's limitations became clearer with every passing film, but the movies were good anyway.

Grint improved a bit, but he was pretty good out of the gate...
 

Darby67

Screenwriter
Joined
Dec 4, 2009
Messages
1,421
Reaction score
1,952
Points
1,610
Real Name
Sean
Tough choice, but I'll go with Prisoner of Azkaban.
 

Chuck Mayer

Lead Actor
Joined
Aug 6, 2001
Messages
8,230
Reaction score
460
Points
9,110
Location
Northern Virginia
Real Name
Chuck Mayer
I’d also say Prisoner. The Columbus films were exceedingly well cast, but Cuaron established a much needed maturation of the sets and filmmaking. The young actors started to get good, and the array of adult actors in PoA was amazing.

And the direction was phenomenal.
 
Last edited:

noel aguirre

Supporting Actor
Premium
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
673
Reaction score
312
Points
610
Location
New York City
Real Name
noel
Goblet of Fire for me - everything about it.
 

noel aguirre

Supporting Actor
Premium
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
673
Reaction score
312
Points
610
Location
New York City
Real Name
noel
"GoF" was the 1st that really started to interest me in the franchise. The 1st 3 left me semi-cold, but "GoF" got me more invested...
Same here- especially the first which I found extremely tedious. If I recall it and Spider-man came out closely around the same time and which to me was so much better after being let down by HP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colin Jacobson

Lord Dalek

Producer
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
4,629
Reaction score
1,612
Points
4,110
Age
34
Real Name
Joel Henderson
Azkaban > Deathly Hallows Pt. II > Half-Blood Prince > Deathly Hallows Pt. I > Goblet of Fire (good adaptation of a terrible book) > Chamber of Secrets > Order of the Phoenix (bad adaptation of a woefully underrated book) > Sorcerer's Stone
 

Colin Jacobson

Lead Actor
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,743
Reaction score
3,490
Points
9,110
Same here- especially the first which I found extremely tedious. If I recall it and Spider-man came out closely around the same time and which to me was so much better after being let down by HP.
I thought the 1st 3 just spent too much time with Harry and his pals as they did Hogwarts stuff and they didn't push their plots very well.

I think that content works in the books but becomes tedious in the movies!

"GoF" was the first where I felt they really started to emphasize story movement over unrelated wizardry...
 

BobO'Link

Lead Actor
Joined
May 3, 2008
Messages
6,519
Reaction score
7,932
Points
9,110
Location
Mid-South
Real Name
Howie
Azkban for me too.

I'd seen Sorcerer's Stone and found it somewhat laughable (the troll/bathroom sequence especially so, partly due to the vfx) vowing to not bother with any others. I don't know why I saw Azkaban but I did and found it much better than the first film. After seeing that one I went back and watched Sorcerer's Stone again. In that viewing the film was much better so I watched Chamber and enjoyed it too. It got a bit tedious towards the end.

Since seeing all the films I started reading the books. They've been fun reads so far (I think the last one I read was Azkaban) in spite of knowing what's going to happen.
 

Tino

Executive Producer
Premium
Joined
Apr 19, 1999
Messages
17,725
Reaction score
9,200
Points
9,110
Age
57
Location
Metro NYC
Real Name
Valentino
Same here- especially the first which I found extremely tedious. If I recall it and Spider-man came out closely around the same time and which to me was so much better after being let down by HP.
Harry Potter And The Sorcerers Stone was released on November 16, 2001.

Spiderman was released almost six months later on May 3 2002.
 

AshJW

Screenwriter
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
581
Points
1,610
Age
51
Location
Hamburg, Germany
Real Name
Thomas
I couldn't say. I watched all of these movies just once. But I do remember liking the later films better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colin Jacobson

Similar threads

Genre: Family, History, Drama
Director: Simon Curtis
Runtime: 107
Release: 2017-09-29
4
Replies
4
Views
1K