The Last Picture Show (Columbia Classics 4K Ultra HD Collection, Vol 3) UHD Review

4.5 Stars Bittersweet classic
The Last Picture Show Review

Director Peter Bogdanovich’s 1971 classic, The Last Picture Show, arrives on 4K UHD Blu-ray as part of Sony’s 6-film Columbia Classics 4K Ultra HD Collection, Volume 3.

The Last Picture Show (1971)
Released: 22 Oct 1971
Rated: R
Runtime: 118 min
Director: Peter Bogdanovich
Genre: Drama, Romance
Cast: Timothy Bottoms, Jeff Bridges, Cybill Shepherd
Writer(s): Larry McMurtry, Peter Bogdanovich
Plot: In 1951, a group of high schoolers come of age in a bleak, isolated, atrophied North Texas town that is slowly dying, both culturally and economically.
IMDB rating: 8.0
MetaScore: 93

Disc Information
Studio: Sony
Distributed By: N/A
Video Resolution: 2160p HEVC w/HDR
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Audio: English 2.0 DTS-HDMA, Other
Subtitles: English SDH, Spanish, French
Rating: R
Run Time: Theatrical Cut: 1 Hr. 58 Min. / Definitive Director's Cut: 2 Hr. 6 Min.
Package Includes: UHD, Blu-ray, Digital Copy
Case Type: 2-disc UHD keepcase with slipcover for each film, all housed in a box
Disc Type: UHD
Region: All
Release Date: 10/25/2022
MSRP: $164.99

The Production: 4/5

When I was growing up in suburban Philadelphia in the late 1970s and early 1980s, The Last Picture Show was a movie that played in rather heavy rotation on what was formally known as WTAF-TV, channel 29. While many of my friends would get excited every time it aired, it was a movie I could never sink my teeth into. Fast forward to the present, and I found the movie rather relevant, considering where I am living now in my late 50s.

Based on the novel by Larry McMurtry, who co-wrote the screenplay with director Peter Bogdanovich, The Last Picture Show is an ensemble piece centered around best friends Sonny Crawford (Timothy Bottoms) and Duane Jackson (Jeff Bridges), two local high school football stars in 1951 Anarene, Texas – a town that is dying as businesses close up shop and its citizens move elsewhere to find employment. Adding to the mix is a love triangle involving rich girl Jacy Farrow (Cybill Shepherd). As the film opens, she’s attached to Duane, but has many suitors lined up, including Sonny and creepy Lester Marlow (Randy Quaid), who takes her on a “date” to a skinny-dipping club. There’s not a whole lot to do in Anarene, other than hang out at the diner, drink at the pool hall, or catch a movie at the local theater that plays nothing but second-run features. When local business owner Sam the Lion (Ben Johnson), who owns all three, decides to shut down the failing movie theater, Sonny and Duane, along with many others in the town, feel like a part of their lives have been stripped away for good.

Having lived in the small, rural town of Hawthorne, Nevada since 2017, I see many young people who are like Sonny, Duane, Jacy, and even Lester who struggle with the lack of things to do in this community. This town hasn’t had a movie theater in over a decade (the closest is in Fallon, nearly 75 miles away), and most of the businesses in town are either bars, convenience stores, or second-hand thrift shops. The major employers are the Army base where old munitions are decommissioned, the local hospital, the school district, and the local Safeway supermarket (whose future is now in doubt after the announced Kroeger-Albertsons merger). That basically leaves kids in this town to participate in sports and/or hang out with their friends and possibly find themselves in trouble, either with the law or as an unsuspecting parent. That is very much the bittersweet sadness of The Last Picture Show, a movie filled with terrific performances from the actors listed above, as well as Cloris Leachman, Ellen Burstyn, Eileen Brennan, Clu Gulager, Sam Bottoms, John Hillerman, and Noble Willingham. The film was nominated for eight Academy Awards including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Adapted Screenplay, with Ben Johnson and Cloris Leachman taking home Oscars for Best Supporting Actor and Actress, respectively.

Video: 5/5

3D Rating: NA

The Last Picture Show has undergone a few editorial changes over the years since it was first released in 1971. For its 20th anniversary, Bogdanovich was given the opportunity to re-edit the picture more to his liking, thus creating the “Director’s Cut” that was released on laserdisc by Criterion in 1991. Eight years later, Bogdanovich made some further revisions for what would be referred to as the “Definitive Director’s Cut.” Sony has included, for the first time on a disc format, both the 1971 theatrical cut and the 1999 “Definitive Director’s Cut,” each version getting its own disc, as part of Sony’s 6-film Columbia Classics 4K Ultra HD Collection, Volume 3.

For this release (per the included restoration notes by Grover Crisp), the original negative was wet-gate scanned in 4K with additional digital image restoration and color timing (a technical term that also refers to adjusting black levels). This has helped to fix many shots that photo-chemical processes back in the day were unable to handle. The results are outstanding, maintaining a very cinematic look while also providing a much sharper image. Contrast has also been improved, thanks to the Dolby Vision high dynamic range (HDR10 is also included), providing deep blacks with strong shadow detail and bright highlights that never appear washed out. This is the best this film has ever looked. The included Blu-ray of the Definitive Director’s Cut has been sourced from this new 4K master.

Audio: 4/5

Sony has opted to keep the original mono soundtrack for this release with some additional cleanup, presented in DTS-HD MA 2.0. The track is virtually free of any pops, crackles, or hiss. Dialogue is clear and understandable throughout.

Special Features: 4/5

The UHD discs of both cuts of the film are movie-only, and have identical menus with no indication as to which cut has been included on the disc (you will have to rely on the disc label). The remastered Blu-ray includes a few new featurettes along with some (but not all) of the supplements that have been carried over from the previous Criterion release.

**NEW** A Tribute to Peter Bogdanovich (1080p; 13:55): Biographer Peter Tonguette discusses the director’s career, emphasizing on The Last Picture Show.

The Last Picture Show: A Look Back (480i; 64:40): The Laurent Bouzereau documentary.

A Discussion with Peter Bogdanovich (1080p; 12:51): A 2009 interview with the director.

Audio Commentary with Peter Bogdanovich

Location Footage (upscaled 1080i; 6:27)

**NEW** Theatrical Re-Release Featurette (upscaled 1080i; 6:03): An old 16mm interview with Bogdanovich, who discusses why he shot the film in black and white, casting, creating a new cut of the film, etc.

Teaser Trailer (1080p; 1:27)

Theatrical Trailer (1080p; 3:04)

Digital Copy: An insert contains codes for all six movies included in the Limited Edition set. The code for The Last Picture Show is for the Definitive Director’s cut only (as indicated on then insert).

Overall: 4.5/5

The Last Picture Show is a sleepy, bittersweet look at a dying town and its effects on those living there, and has never looked better. Unfortunately, at this time, it is only available as part of the Columbia Classics 4K Ultra HD Collection, Volume 3 boxed set.

Todd Erwin has been a reviewer at Home Theater Forum since 2008. His love of movies began as a young child, first showing Super 8 movies in his backyard during the summer to friends and neighbors at age 10. He also received his first movie camera that year, a hand-crank Wollensak 8mm with three fixed lenses. In 1980, he graduated to "talkies" with his award-winning short The Ape-Man, followed by the cult favorite The Adventures of Terrific Man two years later. Other films include Myth or Fact: The Talbert Terror and Warren's Revenge (which is currently being restored). In addition to movie reviews, Todd has written many articles for Home Theater Forum centering mostly on streaming as well as an occasional hardware review, is the host of his own video podcast Streaming News & Views on YouTube and is a frequent guest on the Home Theater United podcast.
Post Disclaimer

Some of our content may contain marketing links, which means we will receive a commission for purchases made via those links. In our editorial content, these affiliate links appear automatically, and our editorial teams are not influenced by our affiliate partnerships. We work with several providers (currently Skimlinks and Amazon) to manage our affiliate relationships. You can find out more about their services by visiting their sites.

Share this post:

Carlo_M

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 31, 1997
Messages
13,478
Thanks for the informative review! I wonder if this will ever be released individually because there aren't that many other films in the V.3 box that I'm interested in...
 

jayembee

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
7,639
Location
Hamster Shire
Real Name
Jerry
Which version of the film is on the Blu-ray? Theatrical cut or Director's Cut, or Definitive Director's Cut?

There are three discs in the release:

(1) Theatrical Version on UHD.
(2) Definitive Director's Cut on UHD.
(3) Definitive Director's Cut on BD.

There's no (undefinitive) "Director's Cut" included.
 

Wayne_j

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Messages
5,211
Real Name
Wayne
I haven't seen the disc, but a local theater played the 4K restoration last week (Without HDR) and it looked excellent. They are having a Jeff Bridges month with a different Jeff Bridges movie every Tuesday.
 

Rob W

Screenwriter
Joined
May 23, 1999
Messages
1,328
Real Name
Robert
I haven't seen the disc, but a local theater played the 4K restoration last week (Without HDR) and it looked excellent. They are having a Jeff Bridges month with a different Jeff Bridges movie every Tuesday.
The studios don't usually re-master their dcp's of their catalogue titles in HDR / Dolby Vision or Atmos - they almost always retain the original theatrical look and sound.
 

Wayne_j

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Messages
5,211
Real Name
Wayne
The studios don't usually re-master their dcp's of their catalogue titles in HDR / Dolby Vision or Atmos - they almost always retain the original theatrical look and sound.
They actually marketed it as Director's Cut New 4K digital restoration.
 

battlebeast

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Messages
4,869
Location
Edmonton, Alberta
Real Name
Warren
Which version was included with the criterion release?

WhaT was dropped from the criterion release?

Is this better than the criterion release?
 

Lord Dalek

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
7,462
Real Name
Joel Henderson
The big thing about the Criterion is its ONLY in the BBS box so you're paying for several other movies. Its also just the Director's Cut (at the request of Bogdanovich) and sourced from a third gen element (why the ONeg wasn't around when Sony did their restorations for that Criterion box I do not know).

Otherwise what's kept:

-2009 solo Peter Bogdanovich Audio Commentary

-"...A Look Back"

-"A Conversation with Peter Bogdanovich"

-Location Footage

-Trailers

What's dropped:

-1991 Criterion Laserdisc commentary

-"Picture This" (1990)

-Francois Truffaut Conversation

What's added:

-1972 Theatrical Cut (in 4k)

-1991 Reissue featurette
 
Last edited:

uncledougie

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 17, 2022
Messages
634
Real Name
Doug
What manipulations do you mean? Gary Brockette?
Later prints were zoomed in to tone down the nudity, like in the pool scene that originally was more graphic and later reframed in the home video prints I have seen. Not sure if Bogdanovich had second thoughts about it or if some of the performers regretted it (I read he was very protective of Cybill Shepherd and her career after this film, at least for a period of time). But the period was a time when especially male nudity was becoming more common, filmmakers pushed the limits, after which there was the inevitable reaction push to tone it down. Nowadays with HBO and Showtime miniseries, it’s hard to go back to the early days and get in the mindset of filmmakers finding new freedoms to depict sex and violence starting in the late 60s through early 70s. Pretty revolutionary for awhile.
Edit: Yes, I believe that’s the character and scene in question; there may have been a few others.
 
Last edited:

Will Krupp

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2003
Messages
4,142
Location
PA
Real Name
Will
Later prints were zoomed in to tone down the nudity, like in the pool scene that originally was more graphic and later reframed in the home video prints I have seen. Not sure if Bogdanovich had second thoughts about it or if some of the performers regretted it (I read he was very protective of Cybill Shepherd and her career after this film, at least for a period of time). But the period was a time when especially male nudity was becoming more common, filmmakers pushed the limits, after which there was the inevitable reaction push to tone it down. Nowadays with HBO and Showtime miniseries, it’s hard to go back to the early days and get in the mindset of filmmakers finding new freedoms to depict sex and violence starting in the late 60s through early 70s. Pretty revolutionary for awhile.
Edit: Yes, I believe that’s the character and scene in question; there may have been a few others.

Well, that's why I was asking because, I have to admit, I did NOT know that was an intentional decision on the part of Bogdanovich. I had always assumed that Gary's disappearing "member" was a result of the older 4:3 video master opening up the matte and the way it appears in widescreen was always the intended way because I had never seen "that" shot in any 16:9 version. I don't know why, but it never occurred to me that he made editorial changes as regards the nudity but it makes perfect sense. Though he leaves Randy Quaid hanging in the wind but not Gary, lol.

To answer your question, the theatrical cut and the definitive director's cut have the same framing, as far as I can tell, all through the swim party.

They're both capital G gorgeous transfers, though the director's cut is the only way I really want to watch it anymore. The material he was forced to cut for time in 1971 is essential, IMO, and more time spent with Eileen Brennan is never a bad idea.

I tried spot checking the director's cut last night and the next thing I knew it was nearly 1:30am and was cursing myself because I had to be up for work in the morning! It was worth it.
 
Last edited:

uncledougie

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 17, 2022
Messages
634
Real Name
Doug
“That shot” was fully revealing in the original theatrical showing ratio (1.85:1), but later zoomed and/or cropped, and I remember reading about other potential minor changes, but it’s been long enough ago I can’t recall the exact source. But I’ve never seen it 4:3, so that’s not where the discrepancy arises. I agree, the scenes reintegrated into the longer cut are very beneficial in enriching the character interplay. How absurd the Columbia execs would take issue with a few minutes of running time. No potential ticket buyer would think “I’m not going to see this film because it runs 126 minutes, and I don’t feel it should be longer than 118 minutes.”
 

compson

Supporting Actor
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
639
Real Name
Robert
I don’t think this is correct. I have RCA’s original laserdisc with the 4:3 image, and the subsequent releases appear to be a normal 1.85:1 image from an open-matte source.
 
Available for Amazon Prime