Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. If you purchase a product from one of our links, we could receive a commission from the seller. Rest assured, we only recommend products we believe in, and all opinions are 100% truthful. Learn More »

A compelling, intimate look at the Fab Four 3.5 Stars

After a last-minute recall earlier this year, Disney has finally released the 3-part mini-series The Beatles: Get Back on Blu-ray.

The Beatles: Get Back (2021)
Released: 25 Nov 2021
Rated: PG-13
Runtime: N/A
Director: Peter Jackson
Genre: Documentary, Biography, Music
Cast: The Beatles, John Lennon, Paul McCartney
Writer(s): N/A
Plot: Documentary about the music group The Beatles featuring in-studio footage that was shot in early 1969 for the 1970 feature film 'Let It Be.'
IMDB rating: 9.0
MetaScore: N/A

Disc Information
Studio: Disney
Distributed By: N/A
Video Resolution: 1080P/AVC
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Audio: Dolby Atmos, English 7.1 Dolby TrueHD, English Descriptive Audio, Other
Subtitles: English SDH, Spanish, French, Other
Rating: Not Rated
Run Time: 7 Hr. 48 Min.
Package Includes: Blu-ray
Case Type: Digibook
Disc Type: BD50 (dual layer)
Region: ABC
Release Date: 07/12/2022
MSRP: $34.99

The Production: 4.5/5

At the end of 1966, The Beatles announced they would stop touring or perform live, instead concentrating on more experimental music and films such as Magical Mystery Tour and Yellow Submarine, and taking control of their careers by creating their own multi-media company, Apple Corps. In January 1969, Paul McCartney, John Lennon, George Harrison and Ringo Starr had planned to shoot a television special at Twickenham Studios in London, performing new material from their new album in front of a live studio audience. Michael Lindsay-Hogg was hired to direct and shoot the rehearsals, which would be incorporated into the TV special. The group jammed for several weeks, coming up with the material for the album and special, but never having a clear vision for what the special would be, as they wanted it to be more than just a “concert film.” Over that time, some 60 hours of film had been shot and over 150 hours of audio were recorded. With the TV special a bust, the footage was originally edited into the film and final album Let It Be in 1970. That film did not paint a favorable picture of the band, which focused more on the tensions between the band members. The film has been out of print for decades, having only been released to the home market on video cassette and Laserdisc by Magnetic Video in the early 1980s.

Fast forward 50 years, and director Peter Jackson is given the opportunity to assemble a new documentary from that 60 hours of film footage and 150 hours of audio recordings. Originally intended to be a theatrical feature, The Beatles: Get Back would eventually become a three-part mini-series (totaling 7 hours, 48 minutes) for the Disney+ streaming service. Jackson scanned and restored the original 16mm footage, synching it up with the restored audio, and the result is an intimate portrait of four guys from Liverpool jamming together, creating new music (much of it later appearing on their own solo albums), and mostly having a great time together despite the ups and downs of trying to also come up with a concept behind the proposed TV special and dealing with the egos of their bandmates. The Beatles: Get Back is a much more positive look at the final days of one of the most popular and influential music groups of all time.

Video: 3/5

3D Rating: NA

There are a few things one needs to keep in mind prior to watching this 3-part documentary. The footage was shot on 16mm film over 50 years ago with the original intention of it appearing on television screens in 1969, which were around 19-20 inches at their largest at the time, and fairly low resolution. When viewing a documentary that relies nearly entirely on archival footage, which Get Back definitely does, one should be more forgiving. Yes, director Peter Jackson has indeed scrubbed nearly all of the film grain from the original 16mm footage, and at times the image does appear somewhat smeared with compromised fine details. The late 1960s/early 1970s pastel color scheme comes across with limited vibrancy, but again, 16mm film stock doesn’t have the resolution or color depth that 35mm or modern HD or 4K video has. Peter Jackson has done the best he can to make this more watchable for the general masses, many who are turned off by overly grainy images, which I am sure the original footage had. Most fans are not watching Get Back for the visual imagery of a band jamming for nearly eight hours, they are watching for the drama and interaction of the band members.

Audio: 4/5

The Beatles: Get Back had originally been planned for a February 2022 release, and less than a week before the planned street date, Disney recalled all copies from retailers and requested that all review copies be shelved. The reason for the last-minute recall was never really clear from the studio, other than it was an audio issue. Comparing the originally pressed Blu-rays to this final release, the difference is that the recalled discs lacked a 7.1 uncompressed PCM track. Interestingly, though, when comparing the file sizes of each disc, they are nearly identical between the two pressings. Even more interesting, when I first inserted disc one from this final release, my player asked me if I wanted to pick up from where I had left off.

That all being said, viewers have essentially four audio options on this release: a default Dolby Atmos (with a Dolby TrueHD 7.1 core), 7.1 uncompressed PCM, 2.0 stereo uncompressed PCM, and 2.0 stereo Descriptive Audio in Dolby Digital compressed at 320 Kbps. Regardless of which track is chosen, this is a fairly front-heavy presentation. Surrounds do get some reverb on the Atmos and 7.1 mixes, with even more bleed in the surrounds on the 2.0 PCM track. The Dolby Atmos track is possibly the weakest, sounding flat when compared to the 7.1 track, which has more breathing room and a wider front stage. In fact, the Atmos track seems to contain no height information whatsoever, the speakers virtually silent throughout. So, the lack of a 7.1 uncompressed track on that original release makes sense for the recall to have occurred.

Special Features: 0.5/5

This is the major disappointment in this release, as there are no video supplements (not even a stand alone version of the rooftop concert that was released to IMAX theaters last spring, which included recent interviews with Jackson and some of the police and people on the street at the time). The online featurette on restoring the footage wasn’t included, either. What we do get is a digibook case with candid photos taken during the original shoot, as well as a set of four 6.5×5 photos, one for each band member.

Overall: 3.5/5

Fans of The Beatles will eat this up, and it is nice to see Disney give one of their Disney+ exclusives get a physical media release. But fans deserve more than just a bare-bones release.

Post Disclaimer

Some of our content may contain marketing links, which means we will receive a commission for purchases made via those links. In our editorial content, these affiliate links appear automatically, and our editorial teams are not influenced by our affiliate partnerships. We work with several providers (currently Skimlinks and Amazon) to manage our affiliate relationships. You can find out more about their services by visiting their sites.

Published by

Todd Erwin

editor,member

View thread (42 replies)

Sam Favate

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
12,300
Real Name
Sam Favate
It would have been nice if they included as a extra the 1970 release of Let It Be so i can get rid of my only dvd bootleg.

Once upon a time, before the pandemic and before this became a 6-hour series, the plan was to release Let It Be with Get Back on Blu-ray. Of course, that was also before Disney+ was involved. FWIW, Apple still insists Let It Be will come out some day, but they’ve literally been saying that for 20 years.
 

davidmatychuk

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Messages
2,107
Location
Vancouver, B.C.
Real Name
David Matychuk
Once upon a time, before the pandemic and before this became a 6-hour series, the plan was to release Let It Be with Get Back on Blu-ray. Of course, that was also before Disney+ was involved. FWIW, Apple still insists Let It Be will come out some day, but they’ve literally been saying that for 20 years.
Longer than that. In 1994, I saw a Coming Soon poster for "Let It Be" on laserdisc and VHS from MPI Home Video at the Tower Records in Bellevue, Washington. When the Beatles Anthology came out a few years later, the footage from "Let It Be" had been remastered beautifully from the 1980's video version, which was nice but also sad. Apple has done some great things with the Beatles' legacy, maintaining the public appetite for all things Beatles, but the continued lack of a proper "Let It Be" remains inexplicable to this Beatle nut, "Get Back" notwithstanding.
 

Sam Favate

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
12,300
Real Name
Sam Favate
Longer than that. In 1994, I saw a Coming Soon poster for "Let It Be" on laserdisc and VHS from MPI Home Video at the Tower Records in Bellevue, Washington.
Let It Be was released in the 80s on home video. I have it (an official version) on CED, and I’m pretty sure it came out on VHS at the same time.

It has not been issued in nearly 40 years. In the early days of DVD, when the Beatles movies were coming out, it was said to be coming. Then, in 2003, they found a huge trove of stolen film from the Let It Be sessions, and the project was put on hold, although the companion album, Let It Be Naked, was released. We kept hearing “soon…soon…” from Paul and Ringo, until Peter Jackson’s film was announced in 2019.
 

Angelo Colombus

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2009
Messages
3,257
Location
Chicago Area
Real Name
Angelo Colombus
Have a laserdisc player and noticed on Ebay last year prices on the laserdisc starting at $500 and one seller had it listed for $1,200.
 

TravisR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
41,539
Location
The basement of the FBI building
Once upon a time, before the pandemic and before this became a 6-hour series, the plan was to release Let It Be with Get Back on Blu-ray. Of course, that was also before Disney+ was involved. FWIW, Apple still insists Let It Be will come out some day, but they’ve literally been saying that for 20 years.
I'm still convinced that they're going to release a 'special edition' with Get Back, Let It Be and more outtakes sooner rather than later. The Beatles seem like one of the few things that can keep getting re-released in today's market.
 

David Norman

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2001
Messages
9,166
Location
Charlotte, NC
I only watched this on Disney+, but there is no excuse for what Peter Jackson did to this 16mm film --- it did NOT have to look like this.


At this point I probably have more money than time left so I'll accept what I can see and hear. Looks better than what I can remember from Sullivan and 50 years of listening to music and movies have decreased my audio faculties more than a bit so perfection is lost on an old body & soul

My children can worry about getting perfect, but since they really aren't interested in 1960's history I think the soul part will be lost in their superior eyes and ears
 

RICK BOND

Screenwriter
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
1,552
Location
New Jersey
Real Name
RICK
I got mine today from Best Buy. The picture is clean and spotless. But, .... No film grain at all ! :unsure: Some shots are Blurry. Close ups are better but No detail or Sharpness ! :huh: The 7.1 PCM Stereo is the best one for audio. If Let it Be (1970) gets released it will also look like this ? :confused: This will be the weakest PQ Bluray in my collection. :unsure: The Little Rascals Vol.1 Bluray from 1929-1930 looks Better !
 

BobO'Link

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 3, 2008
Messages
10,693
Location
Mid-South
Real Name
Howie
My kids really aren't too interested in The Beatles. However - my 2 oldest granddaughters (11yo and 15yo) are *huge* fans and will possibly be watching this with me (if they've not done so already as they have Disney+ at home).

Just yesterday a coworker (~50) said "The Beatles are over rated" (we were discussing the new Elvis movie and whether or not it was anything younger people would bother seeing). FWIW he went on to include Elvis, Dylan, The Stones, Zeppelin, Hendrix, and a few others - I generally regard him as rather clueless as to music history with his comments like that. While I generally disagree, that sentiment is shared by many in his generation and younger. I can't help but wonder just how much sales of Beatles music and movies will fall off as the Boomer generation dies.

My Target order is now showing a delivery date of Monday, July 18th... that's pushed back from the 12th...
 

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
25,044
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
At this point I probably have more money than time left so I'll accept what I can see and hear. Looks better than what I can remember from Sullivan and 50 years of listening to music and movies have decreased my audio faculties more than a bit so perfection is lost on an old body & soul

My children can worry about getting perfect, but since they really aren't interested in 1960's history I think the soul part will be lost in their superior eyes and ears

I think it just comes down to the idea that Peter Jackson was interested in creating a new work and wasn’t beholden to maintaining the stylistic attributes inherent in the original film elements. It wouldn’t be proper to give this treatment to the Let It Be film since that’s a completed work in its own right, but I see no issue with taking the same raw materials and using them differently. He employed the same techniques to great acclaim in his WWI documentary.
 

BobO'Link

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 3, 2008
Messages
10,693
Location
Mid-South
Real Name
Howie
Well... Jackson *did* "film" The Hobbit with 48fps digital cameras which gave it a similar appearance as extreme digital scrubbing. That "soap opera" or TV look rather than film.
 

Todd Mattraw

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
67
Location
Mattydale NY
Real Name
Todd
I think it just comes down to the idea that Peter Jackson was interested in creating a new work and wasn’t beholden to maintaining the stylistic attributes inherent in the original film elements. It wouldn’t be proper to give this treatment to the Let It Be film since that’s a completed work in its own right, but I see no issue with taking the same raw materials and using them differently. He employed the same techniques to great acclaim in his WWI documentary.

It simply looks awful. Different sure...awful different. But anyone is free to like it as he's presented it --- I sure don't.
 

Colin Jacobson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
12,395
I think it just comes down to the idea that Peter Jackson was interested in creating a new work and wasn’t beholden to maintaining the stylistic attributes inherent in the original film elements. It wouldn’t be proper to give this treatment to the Let It Be film since that’s a completed work in its own right, but I see no issue with taking the same raw materials and using them differently. He employed the same techniques to great acclaim in his WWI documentary.

And I thought PJ's attempts to "modernize" the WWI footage were a disaster as well.

Just make the original footage look as good as possible while still allowing it to look like part of its era.
 

TJPC

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2016
Messages
4,759
Location
Hamilton Ontario
Real Name
Terry Carroll
I would totally disagree about the WW1 footage. Jackson was able to bring it into the modern age. Instead of some far away antique, for the first time these young men were real and we could completely understand the sacrifices they made and the conditions they endured. Colour, cleaning up frames, adding sound, and 3D created an immediacy like never before.
 

Colin Jacobson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
12,395
I would totally disagree about the WW1 footage. Jackson was able to bring it into the modern age. Instead of some far away antique, for the first time these young men were real and we could completely understand the sacrifices they made and the conditions they endured. Colour, cleaning up frames, adding sound, and 3D created an immediacy like never before.

Or... it made the footage gimmicky and off-putting.

I never felt immersed in the material because it comes across like some CG reinvention of the footage.

It's never "real". The source has been manipulated to such extremes that it might as well be a cartoon.
 

TJPC

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2016
Messages
4,759
Location
Hamilton Ontario
Real Name
Terry Carroll
Have you ever seen real colour footage of Adolph Hitler and WW 2? I had the same reaction as I did to the Jackson Footage. Everything was suddenly real.