Sorcerer: Criterion Collection — 4K UHD review

5 Stars A William Friedkin masterpiece makes a gorgeous 4K UHD debut in the Criterion Collection.
Sorcerer: Criterion Collection 4k uhd review

A William Friedkin masterpiece makes a gorgeous 4K UHD debut in the Criterion Collection.

Sorcerer (1977)
Released: 24 Jun 1977
Rated: PG
Runtime: 121 min
Director: William Friedkin
Genre: Adventure, Drama, Thriller
Cast: Roy Scheider, Bruno Cremer, Francisco Rabal
Writer(s): Walon Green, Georges Arnaud, William Friedkin
Plot: Four unfortunate men from different parts of the globe agree to risk their lives transporting gallons of nitroglycerin across dangerous Latin American jungle.
IMDB rating: 7.7
MetaScore: 68

Disc Information
Studio: Warner Brothers
Distributed By: Criterion Collection
Video Resolution: 2160p HEVC w/HDR
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Audio: English 2.0 DTS-HDMA, English 5.1 DTS-HDMA
Subtitles: English SDH
Rating: PG
Run Time: 2 Hr. 1 Min.
Package Includes: UHD, Blu-ray
Case Type: Three-disc digipak with slipcover
Disc Type: BD50 (dual layer)
Region: A
Release Date: 06/24/2025
MSRP: $49.95

The Production: 5/5

Within a supplemental documentary for this release of Sorcerer, director William Friedkin states, unequivocally, that this 1977 film — a loose modernization of Georges Arnaud’s 1950 novel The Wages of Fear — is the one for which he most wants to be remembered. Coming from the man who oversaw his fair share of masterfully made films (The French Connection; The Exorcist; Cruising; To Live and Die in L.A.; Bug), it’s a striking statement, particularly when considering just how fraught its reception was upon release, and how Friedkin, who died in 2023, didn’t really come to grips with what he’d made until many years later.

Still, watching Sorcerer, it’s easy to understand why, of all his films, Friedkin would single out this hypnotic, existentially fraught and nerve-shredding opus as his finest hour. In plunging four morally dubious protagonists in the depths of the unforgiving jungle, tasked with driving two truckloads of nitroglycerine 200 miles across unpredictable, unforgiving terrain, Friedkin made a politically charged thriller which only grows more relevant and harrowing with each passing year. Overshadowed upon its release by escapist blockbuster Star Wars, Sorcerer has emerged as one of the best films of the 1970s, and an extraordinary piece of cinema.

Sorcerer, which Friedkin co-wrote with Walon Green, was the first theatrical film Friedkin made following the Oscar-winning, blockbuster success that was 1973’s The Exorcist. He retained his fondness for infusing a ficitional narrative with documentary-like elements, as evidenced by the opening half-hour of Sorcerer, which tracks four, seemingly unrelated characters in brief sequences. There’s Nilo (Francisco Cabal), a dapper Veracruz assassin; Kassem (Amidou), a Palestinian terrorist who orchestrates a Jerusalem bombing; Victor Manzon (Bruno Cremer), a Parisian financier facing fraud charges, and Scanlon (Roy Scheider), a mid-level Irish mafioso in Elizabeth, New Jersey, who goes on the lam after a church robbery goes bloodily awry.

All four men land in the fictional Central American village of Porvenir (filmed in the Dominican Republic), a place of dire poverty and soul-crushing manual labor. Porvenir is dominated by a nameless American oil company, which soon finds itself in need of drivers, when a well explodes and catches fire, needing nitroglycerine to snuff the flames. The four volunteers are divided between two trucks, and the journey begins.

Long stretches of Sorcerer unfold free from any dialogue, which allows Friedkin to harness the individual elements of cinema — sound, image, editing — in such a way as to rivet the viewer’s attention on the most granular details. The sweat on a man’s brow, the way an old package of dynamite leaks explosive fluid, the animals populating the dense foliage around them — Sorcerer remains gripping, in part because it is so effortlessly immersive. Every turn in the road brings a fresh threat, and Friedkin deftly tightens the screw to an almost merciless degree. That the film climaxes with an ugly reality, rather than a conventionally happy ending, further speaks to his commitment to his vision.

The cast is superb throughout, as Scheider, often dinged as not being up to the material, does a fine job evoking a man on the ragged edge of sanity, and Cremer, Amidou and Cabal each have moments to shine, vividly illustrating each man’s plight in economic fashion. The infamous set pieces are numerous — not least the absolutely dazzling and terrifying bridge crossing, filmed in Mexico, as well as the superbly edited “tree removal” scene — and all of it makes the grueling, multi-year production feel worth it. While Sorcerer took some time to get its due, film fans can now revel in what William Friedkin himself considers the finest work he ever crafted.

Video: 5/5

3D Rating: NA

Sorcerer makes its debut in the Criterion Collection and on 4K UHD disc with a 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen presentation, offered with a Dolby Vision high dynamic range (HDR) grade and in 2160p resolution. Per the included booklet, this 4K restoration was created from the original 35mm camera negative, with select shots taken from a 35mm color reversal intermediate.

For color reference, Criterion used a 1998 35mm print (provided by Paramount) as well as a 2013 digital master, both of which were approved by the late Friedkin. Presumably, the 2013 digital master was used to create Warner Brothers’ prior 2014 Blu-ray release of Sorcerer, although that version was presented at 1.78:1. (The Criterion set also features the 2025 restoration on a separate Blu-ray in high-definition SDR.)

Regardless, this 2025 4K edition looks superb, wonderfully filmic and evocative of a newly struck print. The image is finely detailed with plenty of clothing and facial texture (such as sweating brows) displayed in crisp, clear fashion. Black levels are solid, there’s a finely resolved layer of grain present and there is no discernible visual blemish to behold.

Audio: 5/5

Sorcerer is heavily dependent upon the effectiveness of its soundtrack, and thankfully, that component is well-represented in the DTS-HD MA 5.1 track featured here. The surrounds get a healthy workout throughout — the scenes in Jerusalem and New Jersey, for instance, feature plenty of immersive detail — and really kick into gear once the descent into the jungle commences, with the bridge sequence full of appropriately water-logged touches and the demolition of the tree, full of punch and bite and presence.

Per the enclosed booklet, the 5.1 remix was created in 2013 and approved by the late Friedkin. The DTS-HD MA 2.0 stereo track included here was remastered from the 35mm magnetic track. Dialogue sounds full and detailed, with no discernible distortion, drop-out or other notable defect to be heard. English subtitles are included.

Special Features: 5/5

A three-disc set feels appropriate for a film of Sorcerer’s ambition, and the Criterion Collection ensures fans get their money’s worth. The 4K UHD disc contains only the film, and there is a Blu-ray disc which also houses only the film.

A second Blu-ray disc is home to the set’s supplemental features: “Friedkin Uncut,” a feature-length 2018 documentary (1:47; Dolby Digital 2.0 stereo; 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen) is here, alongside a 2025 conversation between filmmaker James Gray and writer Sean Fennessey (28:18; Dolby Digital 2.0 stereo; 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen); a nearly-feature-length 2015 conversation between Friedkin and filmmaker Nicolas Winding Refn (1:17; Dolby Digital 2.0 stereo; 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen); audio excerpts of interviews with Walon Green and editor Bud Smith (36:27; Dolby Digital 1.0 mono; 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen); a silent montage of behind-the-scenes footage from the New Jersey location shooting (6:09; 1.33:1 fullscreen) and the film’s theatrical trailer (2:53; Dolby Digital 1.0 mono; 1.33:1 fullscreen).

A booklet, featuring an essay from film critic Justin Chang and technical information about the video and audio restoration, completes the three-disc set.

Overall: 5/5

Within a supplemental documentary for this release of Sorcerer, director William Friedkin states, unequivocally, that this 1977 film — a loose modernization of George Arnaud’s 1950 novel The Wages of Fear — is the one for which he most wants to be remembered. Coming from the man who oversaw his fair share of masterfully made films (The French Connection; The Exorcist; Cruising; To Live and Die in L.A.; Bug), it’s a striking statement, particularly when considering just how fraught its reception was upon release, and how Friedkin, who died in 2023, didn’t really come to grips with what he’d made until many years later.

Still, watching Sorcerer, it’s easy to understand why, of all his films, Friedkin would single out this hypnotic, existentially fraught and nerve-shredding opus as his finest hour. In plunging four morally dubious protagonists in the depths of the unforgiving jungle, tasked with driving two truckloads of nitroglycerine 200 miles across unpredictable, unforgiving terrain, Friedkin made a politically charged thriller which only grows more relevant and harrowing with each passing year. Overshadowed upon its release by escapist blockbuster Star Wars, Sorcerer has emerged as one of the best films of the 1970s, and an extraordinary piece of cinema.

A superb visual and aural presentation, together with some well-chosen supplements, makes this three-disc package a gift for fans of the film, and a welcome addition to the Criterion Collection. Very highly recommended.

Post Disclaimer

Some of our content may contain marketing links, which means we will receive a commission for purchases made via those links. In our editorial content, these affiliate links appear automatically, and our editorial teams are not influenced by our affiliate partnerships. We work with several providers (currently Skimlinks and Amazon) to manage our affiliate relationships. You can find out more about their services by visiting their sites.

Share this post:

Wayne Klein

Supporting Actor
Joined
Mar 9, 2005
Messages
908
Hopefully mine arrives tomorrow. it’s always dicey with Amazon. It says it will but they’ve lied to me before.
 

Wayne Klein

Supporting Actor
Joined
Mar 9, 2005
Messages
908
There’s quite the debate on the color timing for this in particular in the review at Blu-ray.com. I do think, based on the caps that it looks more film like. While I did like some of the color choices in the Warner Blu, it looked a little too digital at times to me.
 

Robert Crawford

Crawdaddy
Moderator
Patron
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 9, 1998
Messages
73,009
Location
Michigan
Real Name
Robert
There’s quite the debate on the color timing for this in particular in the review at Blu-ray.com. I do think, based on the caps that it looks more film like. While I did like some of the color choices in the Warner Blu, it looked a little too digital at times to me.
Shocking!
 

tenia

Supporting Actor
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
631
Location
France
Real Name
Rémy
There’s quite the debate on the color timing for this in particular in the review at Blu-ray.com. I do think, based on the caps that it looks more film like. While I did like some of the color choices in the Warner Blu, it looked a little too digital at times to me.
The debate mostly happened because of their rubbish official review, which predictably went overboard due to the reviewer's recurring color-grading crusade. What's new.
Not that the Warner disc ever was a reference in this department, though.
 
Last edited:

Harry-N

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2003
Messages
4,078
Location
Sunny Central Florida
Real Name
Harry N.
I was initially on the fence with this one having seen screencaps of the new release that looked decidedly blue-ish, but as I thought more about it, I realized that no-one really knows what Friedkin had in his head regarding the color palette other than he was quoted as saying that the Warner disc was the way he wanted it. But when you think about all this, every TV, every movie theater, every studio monitor can have differences in their color settings, and every set of human eyes sees things differently. I'm convinced of that. How many of you have said to your significant other, "look at that purple thing over there. " And the reply is that it's not purple, it's blue.

Or look at that guy over there, doesn't he look just like John Doe? And the reply is, no, he doesn't look anything like John Doe. These are the vagaries of human vision and perception.

So, while I once was not going to double-dip on this one, I love this movie too much to not have everything there is out there. I've still got the ancient 4:3 DVD, the book-format Blu-ray, the keep-case Blu-ray, and even a revised DVD from 2014. So now I will have a UHD 4K copy (without a player!) and a new Blu-ray transfer.
 

BaronVH

Grip
Joined
Jan 9, 2023
Messages
16
Real Name
John CH
That site is fine for sales announcements and such, but the reviewers’ taste in films tend to be particularly nuts. It is either AI or by someone that completely dislikes older classics.
 

JoshZ

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
3,224
Location
Boston
Real Name
Joshua Zyber
I was initially on the fence with this one having seen screencaps of the new release that looked decidedly blue-ish, but as I thought more about it, I realized that no-one really knows what Friedkin had in his head regarding the color palette other than he was quoted as saying that the Warner disc was the way he wanted it.

Friedkin also had frustrating revisionist tendencies when it came to remastering his old work. The "pastel" nonsense he inflicted onto The French Connection (later fixed with a re-release) and The Boys in the Band (still uncorrected) was abhorrent. The Arrow Blu-ray of Cruising was heavily DNR'ed and tinted blue at Friedkin's direction, but the label remastered it again later after his death to undo all that for the 4K release.
 

tenia

Supporting Actor
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
631
Location
France
Real Name
Rémy
That site is fine for sales announcements and such, but the reviewers’ taste in films tend to be particularly nuts. It is either AI or by someone that completely dislikes older classics.
Fortunately, some of the reviewers there are still pretty engaged in providing reviews as objectively accurate as possible, but in the meantime, you get a ranting old man who uses blu-ray reviews as a soapbox, a reviewer with the most template-ified reviews I've ever read, a reviewer specialized in catalogue movies but who seemingly have issues with transfers properly retaining high frequencies, and I seem to recall another reviewer who doesn't really understand how HDR and DV works.

Fortunately, they at least stopped banning useful members of their board that kept compensating for these shortcomings, so there's at least the people there to do what the official reviewers can't.

To be fair, too many AV tech reviewers with websites like blu-ray.com aren't as discerning as they should (or as other people manage to be), but it's another level of issue when you have a team of reviewers but that's mostly composed of people failing in such a way. I understand they need a certain amount of reviewers to cover as many releases as they do, but do they need reviews like these ? What are their added value ?

I realized that no-one really knows what Friedkin had in his head regarding the color palette other than he was quoted as saying that the Warner disc was the way he wanted it.
I supposed that's why Criterion also sourced a 1998 35mm print, though who knows if it was already revised as it also was approved by Friedkin.
Still, now that comparisons with the 2013 discs are popping up online, it is interesting to see that several scenes look very similarly graded to how they were in 2013. I mean...
 
Last edited:

Konstantinos

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
3,941
Real Name
Konstantinos
Fortunately, they at least stopped banning useful members of their board that kept compensating for these shortcomings, so there's at least the people there to do what the official reviewers can't.
Tell me about it!
I even see members that are heavily criticizing the reviewer calling names and stuff, and are not banned, and I was banned for having a "crusade" against the Criterion teal-y Fantastic Planet.
And now that the reviewer is criticizing most Criterion blu-rays for their teal colors, I really can't understand how he didn't see it on that blu-ray!
But I'm way off topic here, I apologize, but had to say it somewhere! :D
 

Worth

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
5,699
Real Name
Nick Dobbs
The older blu-ray looked pretty good, especially compared to some of Friedkin's other approved masters, but the colour was oversaturated.
 

Winston T. Boogie

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 31, 2004
Messages
13,293
Location
Agua Verde
Real Name
Pike Bishop
The older blu-ray looked pretty good, especially compared to some of Friedkin's other approved masters, but the colour was oversaturated.

This is what I remember from the disc that came in the Blu-ray book. The colors popped, big time. I love the film, so I am most certainly picking up the Criterion. I did not have an issue with the Warner disc, but I did let out a "Wow!" when I was watching it because I had never remembered the colors leaping off the screen like that. My assumption was that was how Friedkin wanted it. I mean the greens of the jungle are amazing in it and because they are so vivid you feel totally enveloped in it. But I also think that color impacts the mood of a film. So, viewers would have to decide. I had never seen the film look like it did on the Warner Blu but, I had seen the film on a bad DVD and on TV for years and in those poor presentations it looked much more drab.

Bottom line though is, great film, get it.
 

Worth

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
5,699
Real Name
Nick Dobbs
I picked up the Criterion and I have to say I don't care for the new colour grading. While I generally think that accusations of colorists turning everything teal are wildly overblown, damned if this doesn't look too teal to me. Is it closer to the way it looked on release? I have no idea, but I kind of doubt it. Overall, I prefer the look of the older blu-ray.
 
Available for Amazon Prime