3 Stars

I am surprised there not even a whisper about a 4K of Gone With The Wind’s 80th Anniversary.
Is Warner’s not interested in what is biggest selling movie of all time?

Published by

Kevin Collins

administrator

Mark-P

Producer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2005
Messages
5,132
Location
Camas, WA
Real Name
Mark Probst
Maybe their budget wouldn’t cover both Wizard of Oz and Gone With the Wind, so they picked just one for this anniversary.
 

Neil S. Bulk

Screenwriter
Joined
Sep 13, 1999
Messages
1,750
Real Name
Neil S. Bulk
Gone With The Wind is $5 on iTunes right now. If it get's a 4k release, this will be upgraded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tino

Josh Steinberg

Film Editor
Reviewer
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
18,747
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
It's available on iTunes with a decent HD presentation.
I think that’s the same transfer that was the basis of the DVD. It’s totally watchable but doesn’t meet the standard WB insists on for a Blu-ray release.
 

Ray H

Cinematographer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2002
Messages
3,551
Location
NJ
Real Name
Ray
I'm thinking we might still see this before the end of the year, but I wonder if WB is a bit nervous about re-releasing Gone with the Wind as there's been some negative sentiment towards it lately.
 

darkrock17

Screenwriter
Joined
Oct 13, 2007
Messages
1,679
Location
Alexandria, VA
Real Name
Andrew McClure
I'm thinking we might still see this before the end of the year, but I wonder if WB is a bit nervous about re-releasing Gone with the Wind as there's been some negative sentiment towards it lately.
This film and Oz are WB's cash cows, they've so far not missed any chance to re-release these two films in order to get more money for themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlanP

Robert Crawford

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 9, 1998
Messages
48,790
Location
Michigan
Real Name
Robert
Enough with "The Wizard of Oz" cover art posts which I've deleted to prevent the back and forth arguments from continuing in this thread. I will ban anybody from this thread that brings it up again here. We don't need to sidetrack this thread too like that other one.
 
Last edited:

Matt Hough

Director
Reviewer
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Messages
22,027
Location
Charlotte, NC
Real Name
Matt Hough
They could put the 70mm version on the 4KUHD for a laugh.:)
Truth be told, I wouldn't mind seeing the "widescreen" version again. I saw it in 1967 during that 70mm presentation and never again. At the time, people were kind of astounded it did blockbuster business at the box-office, but the film has always had its champions. I understood the image was compromised in order to get that wider ratio, but my memories of the experience have completely faded over time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlanP

TJPC

Cinematographer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2016
Messages
3,837
Location
Hamilton Ontario
Real Name
Terry Carroll
All these things are momentary anomalies to appeal to current tastes. I remember a theatrical release of “Fantasia” advertised as “The Ultimate Trip”, and another where the original soundtrack was removed and replaced by a new digital recording of Stokowski’s orchestrations. I still have the CDs of that last one.
 

Stephen_J_H

All Things Film Junkie
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
6,312
Location
North of the 49th
Real Name
Stephen J. Hill
That would be these releases:

IIRC, the narration for 1982 digital re-recording re-release was done by Hugh Douglas, then replaced by Tim Matheson for a 1985 limited re-release. FWIW, Fantasia was also subjected to a cropped "widescreen" version in SuperScope in 1956.

And now, back to the original topic.....
 

MatthewA

Lead Actor
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,063
Location
Salinas, CA
Real Name
Matthew
I'm not sure Fantasia is the best analogy to use here considering the optical alteration of the "Pastoral Symphony" sequence over the years.
 

BobO'Link

Lead Actor
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 3, 2008
Messages
6,809
Location
Mid-South
Real Name
Howie
My wife has *never* seen Gone with the Wind and has zero interest in ever seeing it. I just don't understand that. I first saw it in the 60s when my parents took my sister and I to a revival showing. I thought it was quite long and a bit boring in places but overall really enjoyed it (and Clark Gable cussed!). I have a one of the DVD releases as well as the 70th Anniversary BR and have never been able to talk her into a viewing. :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tony Bensley