It's now 25 years and and gets better every time 4 Stars

It’s hard to believe that we’re already celebrating the 25th anniversary of Mission: Impossible’s first cinematic adventure. Perhaps the most faithful to the original television series in approach (though clearly deviating character-wise), this film stands the test of time. The action sequences are terrifically staged and the simmering intensity of Cruise’s Hunt character standouts. The construction of the scene between Hunt and Kittridge (played by Henry Czerny) is perhaps the film’s most dramatically exciting. While the UHD release is still the absolute best way to watch this film, for those not yet 4K equipped, this remastered Blu-ray is a very close second and is an absolute upgrade from the previous disappointing Blu-ray release.

Mission: Impossible (1996)
Released: 22 May 1996
Rated: PG-13
Runtime: 110 min
Director: Brian De Palma
Genre: Action, Adventure, Thriller
Cast: Tom Cruise, Jon Voight, Emmanuelle Béart, Henry Czerny
Writer(s): Bruce Geller (television series), David Koepp (story), Steven Zaillian (story), David Koepp (screenplay), Robert Towne (screenplay)
Plot: An American agent, under false suspicion of disloyalty, must discover and expose the real spy without the help of his organization.
IMDB rating: 7.1
MetaScore: 59

Disc Information
Studio: Paramount
Distributed By: N/A
Video Resolution: 1080P/AVC
Aspect Ratio: 2.39.1
Audio: English 5.1 Dolby TrueHD, French 5.1 DD, Other
Subtitles: English SDH, French, Other
Rating: PG-13
Run Time: 1 Hr. 50 Min.
Package Includes: Blu-ray, Digital Copy
Case Type: Standard with slipsleeve
Disc Type: BD50 (dual layer)
Region: A
Release Date: 05/18/2021
MSRP: $12.99

The Production: 4/5

“Can I ask you something, Kittridge? If you’re dealing with a man who has crushed, shot, stabbed, and detonated five members of his own IMF team, how devastated do you think you’re gonna make him by hauling Mom and Uncle Donald down to the county courthouse?”

In 1996, the Tom Cruise-led Mission: Impossible launched what would become a highly successful film series, and it did so with two gambles. The first was a distinct side step of the original 1970s television series, where each week a small, beloved ensemble of characters, were challenged to engage in the bold and brave execution of daring missions. The film shifted its focus to the Ethan Hunt character played by Tom Cruise. Though there is always a close supporting cast, it is upon Ethan’s pursuits that we, the audience, are asked to invest ourselves. The second gamble was in the plotting. In his review upon the film’s theatrical release, Roger Ebert described the plot as “impenetrable.” That’s not a far cry from the truth, but the labyrinthine plotting, and Brian DePalma’s knowing direction, help elevate the film from the trappings of just another action spectacle. In fact, action is at a relative minimum in this inaugural outing, though when the sparks do fly, they fly with style.

The basic plot revolves around a failed mission, one that in which the team were shadowed by a second as part of an effort to root out a suspected mole in the Impossible Mission Force (IMF) organization. Cruise’s Ethan Hunt, the only member of his team to survive, apparently, after the mission went sideways, is naturally the primes suspect. Confronted, Hunt makes a daring escape, and, on the run, assembles a team and undertakes daring operations on his new mission to clear his name and find the true mole. Making up his team is Luther Stickell, a technical wizard played nicely by Ving Rhames. Franz Krieger is the tactical support player, played gruffly by the likeable Jean Reno, and the demure and lovely Claire Phelps, is the only other surviving member of the original team, is played with some subtlety by Emmanuelle Béart,

Tom Cruise establishes his Ethan Hunt hero as capable but vulnerable, brawny with brains, stylish and sophisticated all at once. The rest of the cast are well suited though it is Rhames who is perhaps the most memorable; certainly, memorable enough to have been called back for many of the sequels.

Jon Voight plays the role of Jim Phelps. Peter Graves, who played the Phelps role in the television series, was slated at one time to appear, but the surprising shift in the nature (and end state) of that character turned him–and, as a result, other original cast members who might cameo-away from the project. Besides the thick plot, it was the change in the Phelps character, and a heavy focus on Cruise’s Ethan Hunt’s character, which most upset fans.

In the end, Mission: Impossible relies upon story complexity and true thriller trappings to enthrall the audience. Plenty of quiet, understated scenes punctuated with set pieces (like the very memorable infiltration of the CIA headquarters, with Cruise hanging precariously above the touch-sensitive floor). There could certainly have been a little more juice in the action and a plot that didn’t require folk to take notes to grasp it the first time around, but for the most part it succeeded in its mission. After all these years, having seen the film many times, the complex plot isn’t really complex, and the multiple views revealing of the plot and scene choreography that went into the film–it’s still a rousing adventure.

Video: 4.5/5

3D Rating: NA

A few years ago, now, I lamented the video quality on the Blu-ray review and concluded, “a proper redo is in order.” Well, proper redo is exactly what Paramount gave this film when they performed a remaster used for the excellence 4K release a few years ago. That remastering serves as the basis for this Blu-ray edition and the upgrade over the previous Blu-ray release is considerable (though the 4K release is still tops).

Filmed with Panavision cameras on 35mm, Mission: Impossible has always appeared somewhat murky on home video releases, but all that is overcome. While not at the same level of precision detail as the 4K release, the level of details here are still stunningly good. The strengths of this remaster follow those found on the UHD release, though without the extra oomph provided by HDR and the extra resolution. Contrast is strong, colors rich and balanced, whites pure and skin details superb.

Audio: 4.5/5

The available Dolby TrueHD 5.1 offering is a noticeable upgrade from the previously offered Dolby Digital 5.1 track. The track is fuller, more dynamic than previous releases with greater surround activity during the set pieces, with the Channel Tunnel climax sequences being the most notable improvement. Bass and Low Frequency Effects in the subwoofer are more generous, and the propulsive score by Danny Elfman, once that I have found an even greater appreciation for these past few years, is more crisply and cleanly presented here.

 

Dialogue is clean and clear out of the center channel.

Special Features: 3/5

Mission: Impossible’s special features are made up of mostly short mini-features covering various aspects of the film, nothing in depth or terribly revealing. The only ‘new’ thing on offer with this package is an IMF car decal which, I can’t lie, I think I might actually put on my car’s rear window.

Mission: Remarkable – 40 Years of Creating the Impossible

  • Mission: Explosive Exploits
  • Mission: Spies Among Us
  • Mission: Catching the Train
  • Mission: International Spy Museum
  • Mission: Agent Dossiers
  • Excellence in Film: Cruise
  • Generation: Cruise
  • Photo Gallery
  • Theatrical Teaser Trailer (HD)
  • Theatrical Trailer (HD)

Overall: 4/5

Mission: Impossible is a better film than some remember. Perhaps the time that has passed, moving us away from how the film shifted away from the television series characters, plus the enduring success of the film franchise, have helped. Brian De Palma’s fingerprints are all over this film and it’s unmistakably a product of his vision and approach merged with high-action and spectacle. This is quite a clever film with the progression of Ethan Hunt’s resolve following the decimation of his team finding great payoff during the climax. It is also a film where the plot ‘twists’ aren’t exactly hidden but obscured enough to give payoff to additional viewings.

It’s hard to believe that we’re already celebrating the 25th anniversary of Mission: Impossible’s first cinematic adventure. Perhaps the most faithful to the original television series in approach (though clearly deviating character-wise), this film stands the test of time. The action sequences are terrifically staged and the simmering intensity of Cruise’s Hunt character standouts. The construction of the scene between Hunt and Kittridge (played by Henry Czerny) is perhaps the film’s most dramatically exciting. While the UHD release is still the best way to watch this film, for those not yet 4K equipped, this remastered Blu-ray is a very close second and is an absolute upgrade from the previous disappointing Blu-ray release.

Post Disclaimer

Some of our content may contain marketing links, which means we will receive a commission for purchases made via those links. In our editorial content, these affiliate links appear automatically, and our editorial teams are not influenced by our affiliate partnerships. We work with several providers (currently Skimlinks and Amazon) to manage our affiliate relationships. You can find out more about their services by visiting their sites.

Published by

Neil Middlemiss

editor

Museum Pieces

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Aug 20, 2020
Messages
196
Real Name
Skylar
Thank you for your review. Because of your review I watched this again last night and like you said, enjoyed it more than the one-and-only time I saw it in the theater 25 years ago. I had too many expectations back then that it could never live up to (I remember walking out of the theater angry that Jim betrayed his team). Though I enjoyed it this time, it still has a fundamental problem, at least for me. If Ethan is working with the CIA the whole time, it makes no sense that in order to sell him being disavowed, he'd have to do things that have a bigger chance of going sideways than succeeding. So the action sequences, which still had me on the edge of my seat 25 years later, are implausible in the sense that, after the fact, the success of Ethan's mission was put in way too of much jeopardy for the sake of drama. But I sure did enjoy seeing it again and wanted to tell you I appreciated your review.
 

WinstonCely

Second Unit
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
267
Real Name
Winston Cely
Sorry, but I’m a bit confused. Is this not the same Blu-ray that’s packaged with the 4K?
 

Colin Jacobson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
10,883
Sorry, but I’m a bit confused. Is this not the same Blu-ray that’s packaged with the 4K?

No - it's a new master.

I believe it's a different, newer master than the version for the 4K disc as well.

Paramount did this for "Forrest Gump" too: 4K based on older master then later BD from a NEW master.

Not a good trend to base 4Ks on older masters and then market a new master only as a BD!
 

JoshZ

Supporting Actor
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
869
Location
Boston
Real Name
Joshua Zyber
Sorry, but I’m a bit confused. Is this not the same Blu-ray that’s packaged with the 4K?

The 4K UHD came packaged with a copy of the old, non-remastered Blu-ray. This is the remastered Blu-ray that should have been included with that package.
 

JoshZ

Supporting Actor
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
869
Location
Boston
Real Name
Joshua Zyber
I believe it's a different, newer master than the version for the 4K disc as well.

Paramount did this for "Forrest Gump" too: 4K based on older master then later BD from a NEW master.

Not a good trend to base 4Ks on older masters and then market a new master only as a BD!

The UHD release was not "based on an older master." It was a new 4K master that looked very different from the old Blu-ray.

The review that kicked off this thread in the first post says: "Well, proper redo is exactly what Paramount gave this film when they performed a remaster used for the excellence 4K release a few years ago. That remastering serves as the basis for this Blu-ray edition and the upgrade over the previous Blu-ray release is considerable (though the 4K release is still tops)" and "The strengths of this remaster follow those found on the UHD release, though without the extra oomph provided by HDR and the extra resolution."
 
Last edited:

Colin Jacobson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
10,883
The UHD release was not "based on an older master." It was a new 4K master that looked very different from the old Blu-ray.

The review that kicked off this thread in the first post says: "Well, proper redo is exactly what Paramount gave this film when they performed a remaster used for the excellence 4K release a few years ago. That remastering serves as the basis for this Blu-ray edition and the upgrade over the previous Blu-ray release is considerable (though the 4K release is still tops)" and "The strengths of this remaster follow those found on the UHD release, though without the extra oomph provided by HDR and the extra resolution."

I still saw edge haloes and some print flaws on the 4K, which I didn't see in the 2021 BD.
 

Stephen_J_H

All Things Film Junkie
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
6,647
Location
North of the 49th
Real Name
Stephen J. Hill
I still saw edge haloes and some print flaws on the 4K, which I didn't see in the 2021 BD.
What you saw may have been "baked in", as Mission: Impossible contains several CG visual effects, which would have been printed out to film rather than part of a DI.
 

JoshZ

Supporting Actor
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
869
Location
Boston
Real Name
Joshua Zyber
Just financially speaking, the likelihood that Paramount would strike a second 4K master just two years after the last one, when no one at all was complaining about the quality of the UHD edition, is almost beyond the realm of plausibility. There was no reason for them to spend money on another remaster if nobody was calling for one.
 

Stephen_J_H

All Things Film Junkie
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
6,647
Location
North of the 49th
Real Name
Stephen J. Hill
Just financially speaking, the likelihood that Paramount would strike a second 4K master just two years after the last one, when no one at all was complaining about the quality of the UHD edition, is almost beyond the realm of plausibility. There was no reason for them to spend money on another remaster if nobody was calling for one.
The master here is probably the 4K master, minus the HDR layer and downrezzed to 1080p.
 

Worth

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
4,214
Real Name
Nick Dobbs
Just financially speaking, the likelihood that Paramount would strike a second 4K master just two years after the last one, when no one at all was complaining about the quality of the UHD edition, is almost beyond the realm of plausibility. There was no reason for them to spend money on another remaster if nobody was calling for one.
More than likely. Though Fox made a new 4K master for Alien, despite having a perfectly good existing 4K master from a few years earlier.
 

JoshZ

Supporting Actor
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
869
Location
Boston
Real Name
Joshua Zyber
More than likely. Though Fox made a new 4K master for Alien, despite having a perfectly good existing 4K master from a few years earlier.

In that case, the previous master did have some issues that fans had complained about. The image was zoomed in too tight and cropped on all four sides of the frame, and suffered a revisionist teal-and-orange color grade. The UHD corrects both of those problems.
 

Neil Middlemiss

Premium
Reviewer
Joined
Nov 15, 2001
Messages
4,750
Real Name
Neil Middlemiss
Thank you for your review. Because of your review I watched this again last night and like you said, enjoyed it more than the one-and-only time I saw it in the theater 25 years ago. I had too many expectations back then that it could never live up to (I remember walking out of the theater angry that Jim betrayed his team). Though I enjoyed it this time, it still has a fundamental problem, at least for me. If Ethan is working with the CIA the whole time, it makes no sense that in order to sell him being disavowed, he'd have to do things that have a bigger chance of going sideways than succeeding. So the action sequences, which still had me on the edge of my seat 25 years later, are implausible in the sense that, after the fact, the success of Ethan's mission was put in way too of much jeopardy for the sake of drama. But I sure did enjoy seeing it again and wanted to tell you I appreciated your review.
Thank you for that, Skylar!
 

albert_m2

Second Unit
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
352
Real Name
Albert
It's funny that this would come out - I saw this one in the theater back then. I thought it was ok, but never bothered with the sequels. A few weeks back, I watch one of the sequels on Amazon and was really impressed. I happen to see the movie collection on sale so I bought it. I just watched this one for the first time since the 90s. Of course it's the previous version of the blu ray, but I did enjoy the movie more this time around.
 

Malcolm R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2002
Messages
20,027
Real Name
Malcolm
Much like the Fast & Furious franchise, this one seemed to get better as it went on. I don't really care for the first two MI films, but have liked everything from Part 3 on.