3 Stars

207008_front.

The price link below will take you directly to the product on Amazon. If you are using an adblocker you will not see link.

Published by

Kevin Collins

administrator

TJPC

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2016
Messages
3,905
Location
Hamilton Ontario
Real Name
Terry Carroll
Wasn’t this the movie that was so hilariously bad it basically was laughed out of the theatres? I remember watching it and hearing about 1/2 of the audience laughing at the “scary” parts and heckling the screen.
 

titch

Supporting Actor
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Messages
777
Real Name
Kevin Oppegaard
Wasn’t this the movie that was so hilariously bad it basically was laughed out of the theatres? I remember watching it and hearing about 1/2 of the audience laughing at the “scary” parts and heckling the screen.
Yup - winner of numerous golden turkey awards, an absolute classic for connoisseurs of extremely bad movies. It's very funny indeed. And it makes an excellent double bill with Zardoz, also by John Boorman. Now I can throw away the Warner disc, which has a rotten transfer. I am surprised and delighted.
 

Lord Dalek

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
4,780
Real Name
Joel Henderson
If you think about it, this may be the movie that invented the direct-to-video cash in sequel. Just without the DTV part
 

RichMurphy

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
501
Location
Alexandria, VA
Real Name
Rich
I remember that the film was pulled and re-edited shortly after its initial release. Have we confirmed that this new Blu-Ray is the original, "so bad it's good" version?
 

TravisR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
35,595
Location
The basement of the FBI building
I remember that the film was pulled and re-edited shortly after its initial release. Have we confirmed that this new Blu-Ray is the original, "so bad it's good" version?
According to Scream Factory's Facebook page, both cuts are on there (presumably one on each disc):
Extras and specs are still in progress and will be announced later in August. However, we can confirm today that we will have a new high-definition transfer of two cuts of the film! (The 117 min version that has been on Blu-ray and DVD before and a shorter, alternate version that was created after the film’s initial release in 1977.) You’ll also be happy to know that we have a brand-new interview with ‘Regan’ herself, actress Linda Blair!
https://www.facebook.com/ScreamFact...961936407493/1218855691584773/?type=3&theater
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark B

3D Projectionist

Supporting Actor
Joined
Mar 23, 2017
Messages
533
Real Name
Lenny
1977 was the time I went to see it on a double bill with the first movie, however I was somewhat late to see the first film so sat thru the second one first. The cinema staff kindly let me stay in the auditorium to catch the first film so I didn't miss the plot although that could be argued:blink:

Always liked number 2 which was sort of tapped into with Brainstorm 1983 a little perhaps as with a few others electrode wise. Richard was often on the bottle reportedly during filming which must have troubled the director and crew and its also interesting to note Heretic was the only sequel to make money during its early box office. May have to delve into the money box for this Blu-Ray.
 

TheSteig

Screenwriter
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
1,563
Real Name
David
Well Scream Factory is known for releasing its share of *bad* movies, and this isn't unfamiliar territory for them. I have some of their *bad* movies, that Ill keep until I no longer enjoy them :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stephen_J_H

Lord Dalek

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
4,780
Real Name
Joel Henderson
I wonder if Scream Factory is planning on assembling an Exorcist box set?
 

Brian Kidd

Premium
Joined
Nov 14, 2000
Messages
2,552
Exorcist II is not a good film, but it's an interesting film. I'd love to read an in-depth book about the making of the film, simply because a film this bonkers has to have a good backstory. I'm a big fan of John Boorman and can appreciate his directorial touch, but I think most of the fault lies with WB for hiring a guy like Boorman, who, love him or hate him, was unique to helm a studio-mandated sequel. Exorcist II isn't a film I can watch often, but I've gone back to it several times and am never bored.
 

MatthewA

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,169
Location
Salinas, CA
Real Name
Matthew
None of the Exorcist movies are any good, including and especially the ludicrously overrated original. The best thing about this particular movie and the entire misbegotten franchise is Dana Plato playing a girl who's "auti-ti-tistic" and magically learns to talk when Regan walks in the room.
 

mBen989

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
51
Real Name
Matthew
It says something about a franchise that The Exorcist sequels have quality releases and the first film still doesn't have its Oscar winning mono mix available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vincent_P

Vincent_P

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2003
Messages
2,054
Exorcist II is not a good film, but it's an interesting film. I'd love to read an in-depth book about the making of the film, simply because a film this bonkers has to have a good backstory. I'm a big fan of John Boorman and can appreciate his directorial touch, but I think most of the fault lies with WB for hiring a guy like Boorman, who, love him or hate him, was unique to helm a studio-mandated sequel. Exorcist II isn't a film I can watch often, but I've gone back to it several times and am never bored.
Rospo Pallenberg's wife wrote an in-depth "Making of" book which was published during the original release, but it's long out-of-print. There are also supposedly a lot of deleted scenes that never even made Boorman's original cut, and there was a big planned effects sequence featuring Regan as a demon that was either never filmed, or filmed and cut, although Dick Smith apparently did finish his effects work in preparation for the scene either way.

Vincent
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Brian Kidd

Vincent_P

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2003
Messages
2,054
It says something about a franchise that The Exorcist sequels have quality releases and the first film still doesn't have its Oscar winning mono mix available.
I'd love to see Criterion tackle the original and restore the original Warners logo, put back the "jump cut" at the end, and include the original mono mix as a viewing option. Also include the various revisions, and the late-1970s 70mm stereo mix, but the original, ORIGINAL version really should be preserved, not just the almost-original version on the current Blu-ray set.

Vincent
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brian Kidd

Dick

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 22, 1999
Messages
8,542
Real Name
Rick
It says something about a franchise that The Exorcist sequels have quality releases and the first film still doesn't have its Oscar winning mono mix available.
Nor does it have the very important Saul Bass logo at the start, which needs to be restored. It sets the mood beautifully.
 

Brian Kidd

Premium
Joined
Nov 14, 2000
Messages
2,552
Boorman's wife wrote an in-depth "Making of" book which was published during the original release, but it's long out-of-print. There are also supposedly a lot of deleted scenes that never even made Boorman's original cut, and there was a big planned effects sequence featuring Reagan as a demon that was either never filmed, or filmed and cut, although Dick Smith apparently did finish his effects work in preparation for the scene either way.

Vincent
Looks like the cheapest copy on Amazon is around $25. Tempted, but a paperback that is that old and wasn't exactly on acid-free paper is probably in pretty rough shape. Still... it sounds fascinating. I may break down and get a copy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vincent_P