Deep Impact UHD Review

4 Stars Solid 90s film looks great
deep impact screenshot

Deep Impact is a film that has gotten better with age. Since its release 25 years ago this year, we’ve seen a slew of movies concerned with world-ending events, like 2012, The Day After Tomorrow, Moonfall, Knowing, and the remake of The Day The Earth Stood Still, and that’s not counting all the plague, zombie, and monster movies out there. As we look back over these recent years, what stands out is how Deep Impact is a more mature, but not always successful dramatic approach to the subject matter. Directed with a sure hand, strong screenplay, performances that range from reasonable to wonderful, and a brilliant score by the late James Horner, come together to deliver something a little different from the end of the world subgenre. If it’s been a while since you saw it, now’s a good time to rediscover how good Deep Impact can be, now with a fine 4K release.

Deep Impact (1998)
Released: 08 May 1998
Rated: PG-13
Runtime: 120 min
Director: Mimi Leder
Genre: Action, Drama, Sci-Fi
Cast: Robert Duvall, Téa Leoni, Elijah Wood
Writer(s): Bruce Joel Rubin, Michael Tolkin
Plot: A comet is discovered to be on a collision course with Earth. As doomsday nears, the human race prepares for the worst.
IMDB rating: 6.2
MetaScore: 40

Disc Information
Studio: Paramount
Distributed By: N/A
Video Resolution: 1080P/AVC
Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
Audio: English 5.1 Dolby TrueHD, Other
Subtitles: English SDH, Spanish, French, Other
Rating: PG-13
Run Time: 2 Hr. 1 Min.
Package Includes: UHD, Blu-ray, Digital Copy
Case Type: Standard 4k with sleeve
Disc Type: BD50 (dual layer)
Region: A
Release Date: 05/02/2023
MSRP: $30.99

The Production: 4/5

“We always thought the deadline for public knowledge was the publication of next year’s budget since we’ve spent more money than we can account for. That won’t happen for two weeks. I don’t suppose I could prevail upon you to wait two weeks in the name of national security?”

A comet is discovered on a collision course with earth. If it impacts, all life on earth will end. It’s the biggest story on the planet, and the reporter who uncovers it (Téa Leoni) is thrust in the center of what it all means when the world finds out, too. A mission to divert the comet becomes the focus of the planet, and if it fails, a controversial Plan B will see lives torn apart, and through it all, the persistence of hope and tragedy will define humanity.

Deep Impact, released the same year as Michael Bay’s similarly themed Armageddon, was the more serious expression of the “celestial body impacting the earth and potentially ending it” story. What was originally a desire by Steven Spielberg to see When World’s Collide remade, became a new story exploring the idea from a different angle. Writer Bruce Joel Rubin, who wrote the film with Michael Tolkin, shared in an interview (2007’s The Dialogue: An Interview with Screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin) the impact When Worlds Collide on his outlook in life. There are echoes of that film in Deep Impact, (Téa Leoni’s character Jenny Lerner struggling with the weight of knowing about the fate of the earth before the world knows, for example), but Deep Impact wants to explore more of the impact on lives and, in some ways, the grounded reality of what it could look like in a handful of those lives as the potential end of it all approaches.

There’s an energy to the film as it begins, but the second act of Deep Impact is surprisingly downbeat for a film helping kickstart the summer movie going season (it launched on May 8; Bay’s Armageddon would follow with the prime July 1 spot). It’s here that the film shows itself to be a committed dramatic thriller rather than a thrilling action adventure, distinguishing itself neatly from Armageddon. But Deep Impact does achieve impressive action spectacle. The first sequence on the surface of the comet, the clogged highway with a thousand traffic jammed cars, and the inevitable impact sequence, are all impressively crafted and staged. But for Deep Impact, it’s a human drama first. The characters, the tension of the space mission, and the terrifying prospects for all life on earth from the impending disaster, are the anchor and persistent focus of the film. It’s refreshing but does mean Deep Impact is less ‘fun’ and escapist than audiences might have hoped or expected.

Mimi Leder, who just a year earlier had delivered the well received, but modestly successful thriller The Peacemaker, the first film from the DreamWorks studio, was tapped to helm. The film begins as a thriller, with a reporter sniffing around a story that doesn’t make sense and could be her big break if she can crack it. That’s a great way to open the film. The newsroom setting remains central as the story breaks and the impending impact and space mission unfold. Leder’s experience behind the camera on the popular medical drama ER would prove a strength in those chaotic newsroom scenes, notably once the president makes the official televised announcement of a mission failure and the lottery associated with the US’s plan B. Leder’s focus on character moments, reactions, emotional moments that could have been spent on predictable visual or special effects shots, is important. She chooses to secure the human drama of the scene. It’s a great choice supported through tight editing (courtesy Paul Cichocki and David Rosenbloom), and a beautifully effective score from James Horner, who himself anchors even the action sequences in the humanity of those moments.

The film has an interesting cast for the different story angles. The newsroom has Téa Leoni as reporter Jenny Lerner, an unusual choice. Leoni wasn’t a household name, and a good portion of the film requires her lead. She can be good in the role, but not always endearing as needed given the dramatic heft of her family drama and position as the ‘face’ of the story. Her mother and father, played by Vanessa Redgrave and Maximilian Schell, are both compelling but there was much more to have been mined from that story, so they feel underused. Morgan Freeman as President Beck is perfect casting. His first scene with Leoni is one of the best in the film simply from the way Freeman plays it, as a political negotiator with grounded realism, but an unmistakable sense of his position. Elijah Wood’s Leo Biederman, the young astronomy enthusiast credited as one of the discoverers of the rogue comet, is likeable, believable. Leelee Sobieski as his friend and ‘love interest’ Sarah Hotchner is good, too. Reportedly, more of the film’s focus was intended for their story but focus group feedback wasn’t as interested in that, so scenes were cut. Other scenes involving a romance Leoni has with her camera man, played by blink and you’ll miss him Dougray Scott (Mission: Impossible II), were also reportedly filmed and cut. As a result, the story intermittently focuses on their stories.

For the mission to insert and detonate a series of nuclear bombs on the comet in an attempt to divert it from hitting the earth, the crew are particularly good. Robert Duvall portrays, Spurgeon Tanner, the elder of the crew from his past having landed on the moon, Ron Eldard is crew captain Oren Monash, Jon Favreau is medic Gus Partenza, Blair Underwood is Mark Simon, Aleksandr Baluev is Mikhail Tulchinsky (he played a good villain in Leder’s The Peacemaker), and Mary McCormack is Andrea Baker, rounding this section of the cast out. Other actors, like ER’s Laura Innes, Richard Schiff, and Star Trek’s Denise Crosby have smaller but solid roles.

Deep Impact came in second to Armageddon (critically and commercially), but it’s by far the better film. The visual effects sequences aren’t as exciting and the human dramatic focus offers a more somber experience and less ‘fun,’ but the sequences rendered by the visual effects are far more emotionally engaging, more meaningful, and the sense of danger and hope more acute. The film holds up well after 25 years (yes, 25 years as if its 4K release!)

Video: 4.5/5

3D Rating: NA

For Deep Impact, Paramount has given the film its best-looking presentation for home theaters. Presented in 2.35:1 aspect ratio, the best compliment I can give this is how unprocessed it looks. A very natural film grain is present, fitting its era, with crisp detail in many areas. The comet surface sequence is a good example with strong light/dark contrasts and the dark, icy surface offering fine detail. Skin tones and detail, evident mostly from close-up shots, are strong, too. Tones are natural, and while the Dolby Visio HDR grading allows a more saturated look to the colors and strong contrasts, it was never a film with a wide or bright color spectrum. Blues and greens are impressive when used, but it’s a muted color palette (clothes, sets, and more.)

A solid looking 4K from Paramount that should please fans.

Audio: 4.5/5

Once again Paramount reuses the previous Blu-ray audio. There are moments where Dolby Atmos could have been a fine feature, but the Dolby TrueHD 5.1 track is no slouch. For good portions of the film, it’s a dialogue drama. Set-piece sequences like the mission on the comet have the most to do, and the 5.1 track manages them well. Explosions, either from the icy comet as the heat from the sun sets off explosive steam, or from the impact in the film’s finale, boom with purpose. Dialogue is clear of issues mostly from the center channel. Surrounds are effective and James Horner’s emotionally potent score invites you to turn the volume up to really feel the moments he’s helping create.

Special Features: 3/5

No special features on the 4K disc, but the Blu-ray disc (a repackage of the old Blu-ray release) carries the legacy extras. What you’ll find in these legacy extras is an appreciation for the earlier visual effects work and the creation of large-scale set pieces (the jammed traffic as people escape for the hills for example).

  • Commentary by director Mimi Leder and visual effects supervisor Scott Farrar
  • Preparing For The End
  • Making An Impact
  • Creating The Perfect Traffic Jam
  • Parting Thoughts
  • Photo Gallery
  • Trailers

Overall: 4/5

Deep Impact is a film that has gotten better with age. Since its release 25 years ago this year, we’ve seen a slew of movies concerned with world-ending events, like 2012, The Day After Tomorrow, Moonfall, Knowing, and the remake of The Day The Earth Stood Still, and that’s not counting all the plague, zombie, and monster movies out there. As we look back over these recent years, what stands out is how Deep Impact is a more mature, but not always successful dramatic approach to the subject matter. Directed with a sure hand, strong screenplay, performances that range from reasonable to wonderful, and a brilliant score by the late James Horner, come together to deliver something a little different from the end of the world subgenre. If it’s been a while since you saw it, now’s a good time to rediscover how good Deep Impact can be, now with a fine 4K release.

Neil has been a member of the Home Theater Forum reviewing staff since 2007, approaching a thousand reviews and interviews with actors, directors, writers, stunt performers, producers and more in that time. A senior communications manager and podcast host with a Fortune 500 company by day, Neil lives in the Charlotte, NC area with his wife and son, serves on the Down Syndrome Association of Greater Charlotte Board of Directors, and has a passion for film scores, with a collection in the thousands.

Post Disclaimer

Some of our content may contain marketing links, which means we will receive a commission for purchases made via those links. In our editorial content, these affiliate links appear automatically, and our editorial teams are not influenced by our affiliate partnerships. We work with several providers (currently Skimlinks and Amazon) to manage our affiliate relationships. You can find out more about their services by visiting their sites.

Share this post:

View thread (27 replies)

jayembee

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
6,774
Location
Hamster Shire
Real Name
Jerry
I remember back when this and Armageddon came out, and so many people seemed to love Bay's film and really disliked Leder's. It's one of those things that mystify me. I found little to like about Armageddon beyond a reasonably exciting opening scene. But Deep Impact I thought was terrific. Every time I've watched it since: cable, DVD, and BD, I shake my head and wonder why so many people didn't like it. I've got the UHD, and just need to find the time to watch it. Glad to know that it's one of Paramount's good ones.
 

Malcolm R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2002
Messages
25,231
Real Name
Malcolm
I'm not sure if people actively disliked Deep Impact, but simply saw it as the "lesser" of two films with similar themes coming out in the same season. Armageddon had the big name stars (Bruce Willis with Ben Affleck and Billy Bob Thornton who had just both won Oscars) who were popular at the time. A popular director, Michael Bay, at the time coming off hits The Rock and Bad Boys and hadn't yet been sucked into the Transformers black hole. A huge rock music soundtrack (4x Platinum) with popular new music from a resurgent Aerosmith and videos all over MTV. It also featured more action and special effects sequences and a sappy love story with a happy ending. I think Armageddon was just perceived as the quintessential "summer movie" while Deep Impact was seen as more of a drama with some FX.

As noted in Neil's review, long stretches of Deep Impact were mostly drama with dialogue. There were only a couple of action sequences and they were pretty brief. Their stars were Tea Leoni and Elijah Wood. There was no flashy soundtrack or pop singles with music videos. Deep Impact actually had the bigger opening of the two films ($41 million vs. $36 million), so that seems to show there was good anticipation for the film. But for many of the reasons I noted above, Armageddon had better legs with more repeat business during the summer.

Both films were profitable (DI $350 million worldwide gross vs. Arm $554 million worldwide) but Armageddon cost nearly twice as much to make (DI $80 million budget vs. Arm $140 million).
 
Last edited:

Colin Jacobson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
13,328
I'm not sure if people actively disliked Deep Impact, but simply saw it as the "lesser" of two films with similar themes coming out in the same season. Armageddon had the big name stars (Bruce Willis with Ben Affleck and Billy Bob Thornton who had just both won Oscars) who were popular at the time. A popular director, Michael Bay, at the time coming off hits The Rock and Bad Boys and hadn't yet been sucked into the Transformers black hole. A huge rock music soundtrack (4x Platinum) with popular new music from a resurgent Aerosmith and videos all over MTV. It also featured more action and special effects sequences and a sappy love story with a happy ending. I think Armageddon was just perceived as the quintessential "summer movie" while Deep Impact was seen as more of a drama with some FX.

As noted in Neil's review, long stretches of Deep Impact were mostly drama with dialogue. There were only a couple of action sequences and they were pretty brief. Their stars were Tea Leoni and Elijah Wood. There was no flashy soundtrack or pop singles with music videos. Deep Impact actually had the bigger opening of the two films ($41 million vs. $36 million), so that seems to show there was good anticipation for the film. But for many of the reasons I noted above, Armageddon had better legs with more repeat business during the summer.

Both films were profitable (DI $350 million worldwide gross vs. Arm $554 million worldwide) but Armageddon cost nearly twice as much to make (DI $80 million budget vs. Arm $140 million).

My comment above aside, I don't think "Impact" is a bad movie. It's just kind of a mess, with too many competing storylines and too little focus.
 

Noel Aguirre

Supporter
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
1,591
Location
New York City
Real Name
noel
So Paramount puts the old audio on the new 4K image but couldn’t bother to include the commentary on it as well? Meaning you’ll be forced to watch the dated blu-ray image if you want to listen to it. That’s a major fail if ever there was one. I can’t imagine it would cost that much more to pay the commentators extra even if their contract called for that. It’s bad enough this wasn’t given the “Paramount Present” treatment and I will purchase it but the commentary missing and lack of a new Atmos soundtrack really irks me.
However thanks for the excellent review of this excellent film Neil!
 

cineMANIAC

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2008
Messages
2,746
Location
New York City
Real Name
Luis
Watched a good chunk of the film last night. It hasn't lost any of its impact (no pun intended) and, while I enjoy both films, DI is my go-to favorite. These kinds of films work better as dramas IMO. After all, they're about the end of the world. What would be the point of showing just carnage and aftermath?

I thought the new 4K scan looks very good overall if not a bit inconsistent. Shots of crowds look like they were shot yesterday, while others look a little dated if that makes any sense. Anything outdoors in broad daylight looks great, of course. I'm happy with this upgrade.
 

JoshZ

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
2,298
Location
Boston
Real Name
Joshua Zyber
I remember back when this and Armageddon came out, and so many people seemed to love Bay's film and really disliked Leder's. It's one of those things that mystify me. I found little to like about Armageddon beyond a reasonably exciting opening scene. But Deep Impact I thought was terrific. Every time I've watched it since: cable, DVD, and BD, I shake my head and wonder why so many people didn't like it. I've got the UHD, and just need to find the time to watch it. Glad to know that it's one of Paramount's good ones.

I may need to revisit this sometime, but I didn't particularly care for either Deep Impact or Armageddon when I first saw them. Of the two, I suppose I disliked Deep Impact less than I disliked Armageddon. but I agree with Colin's assessment that it was too messy and unfocused. I also felt that the attempt to dress it up as a prestige drama only served to undermine what was in reality just another silly disaster movie.
 

Tino

Taken As Ballast
Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 1999
Messages
23,641
Location
Metro NYC
Real Name
Valentino
On sale on iTunes digitally for $6.99 now. Has been as low as $4.99 too.
 

KeithDA

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
610
Location
Darlington, UK
Real Name
Keith
I bought this based on the reviews here and because I wanted something new to watch on my recently acquired LGG3 OLED. I thought I must have seen the film on TV at some point, but I hadn't. I really enjoyed it. It takes its time to deliver quite a lot of different story lines and it doesn't pull back many emotional punches either.
It definitely holds up after 25 years. :thumbsup:
 

Jonathan Perregaux

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 10, 1999
Messages
2,043
Real Name
Jonathan Perregaux
I was watching this late at night and reluctantly had to shut if off and go to bed. It was during the part where Messiah was on its way to the comet. Prior to that moment was Téa Leone's brief character journey as an investigative reporter cracking a story. It showed her unwittingly (but not witlessly) bluffing herself through what she initially thought was a hackneyed cover-up. She managed to get from "Ellie" to "E.L.E." by relying on her instincts—and also keeping a straight face in front of very powerful people. In a lesser film, this would have been ridiculous (and maybe it is, but it was played well).

So when I picked up on Deep Impact again the next night, I actually skipped backwards to re-watch all of that again. I found it more fascinating than the comet striking the earth. So, in other words, Téa acted her way above an apocalyptic event, which is usually treated as destructo-porn (*cough* Armageddon, 2012, etc. *cough*).
 

YANG

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 10, 1999
Messages
1,466
it was not surprising that Armageddon gained lots of attentions then when Deep Impact was screening at the same period.
one a popcorn flick, another a Stephen Spielberg production that could be too serious on plot and boring.
when we have to pay USD$12.50~$20(depending on region) for a entry ticket, which comet crashing earth flick will offer more value?
 

Malcolm R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2002
Messages
25,231
Real Name
Malcolm
They weren't technically playing against each other all the time. Deep Impact was released close to two months before Armageddon, (May 8 vs. July 1) so it mostly wouldn't have been an either/or choice at the theater.

Deep Impact was still playing in over 1,000 theaters when Armageddon was released, but it had already made the bulk of its gross. It made about $5 million of it's $140 million gross post-Armageddon. ;)
 
Last edited:

Lord Dalek

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
7,107
Real Name
Joel Henderson
They weren't technically playing against each other all the time. Deep Impact was released close to two months before Armageddon, (May 8 vs. July 1) so it mostly wouldn't have been an either/or choice at the theater.

Deep Impact was still playing in over 1,000 theaters when Armageddon was released, but it had already made the bulk of it's gross. It made about $5 million of it's $140 million gross post-Armageddon. ;)

If anything, it was The Truman Shpw that took a serious whack at Deep Impact's final cume.
 
Most Popular
Available for Amazon Prime