Mike Boone
Supporting Actor
Robert, RAH's point that in some cases, 4k UHD Blu-ray movie releases have resulted in 4k that went "FAR beyond any perceived technical benefits over a high quality Blu-ray derived from the same master element", then led to you making this indisputable statement: "That point is taken, but it’s still a business in which moving units is imperative when it comes to profitability." I would add to what you there said by saying that a more blunt, and justified, way that you could have expressed the same thought would have been to say that just for the sake of increasing profits, occasionally some companies that issue 4k UHD Blu-ray versions of movies, do so, even though the producers of such discs are aware that those 4k Blu-rays offer no significant visual improvement compared to quality 1080p Blu-rays based on the same master elements. And that literally means that a few unethical folks, at certain companies, engage in pure cash grabs by selling 4k labeled Blu-rays to unwary consumers who believe a mere presence of the phrase "4k UHD" at the top of a Blu-ray's disc cover, gives it a sort of seal of approval, which means that its purchaser can rest assured that he, or she, will be get a 4k Blu-ray that will display higher video quality than its 1080p counterpart.You have made that point a number of times in different threads. That point is taken, but it’s still a business in which moving units is imperative when it comes to profitability.
So what a shame it is that, for example, some company executive had decided to put on the market a supposed 4k UHD Blu-ray version of a movie like 1974's The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, which was shot on 16 mm film, a film format that a quality 1080p Blu-ray is more than capable of capturing the full resolution of. And the content of TTCSM, while it's effective at creating a sense of foreboding & horror, doesn't even seem to have much material which would make very effective HDR possible.