Joel Vardy
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Oct 20, 1998
- Messages
- 573
I'm sorry if it was already mentioned...but since the push out of The Grapes of Wrath this would be on top of my list for Fox Classics in '04.
Joel
Joel
Fox should start a "cult/camp" type collection, similar to MGM's Midnite Movies, for fare that doesn't really fall into the "classic" category.yes, absolutely!
and Dirty Mary, Crazy Larry & Vanishing Point should be among the first.
i wonder how well the sales are for MGMs budget MM line?
i generally hate MGM and cringe whenever i realize a favorite film is under their domain, but i have to admit they have done an exceptional job with their MMs.
The Three Faces of Eve
Formerly released on VHS as a Studio Classic, and such a great film.Don't forget that it was released on Laserdisc too. (I own the LD)
A great many of the titles mentioned would be finding a home in my library if released.
Hate to break it to ya, but Oklahoma and South Pacific weren't actually made by Fox.Well, don't beat yourself up about it.
Magna Theatre Corporation produced Oklahoma! (they "raised money (to produce the film)" as a banner project for the Todd-AO process), and it appears they also distributed the film in its original 70mm runs, with RKO handling the 35mm CinemaScope version (this according to the IMDB). At some point rights were transferred to 20th Century Fox. To call it a "Fox Studio Classic" might be a stretch, granted, but Fox owns the rights, and they've retired their "Five-Star" line ... I think they could include it as a Fox Studio property, particularly given that they themselves produced some of the later Rodgers and Hammerstein films. Oklahoma! belongs to them, so calling it a "Fox Studio" film really isn't all that different from calling it a "20th Century Fox" film, which would be done for theatrical re-releases and is, of course, implied on the current DVDs. If they own it, it's theirs, and it's far from uncommon for a studio which now holds the rights to the films of another studio to market the picture under their own banner (in fact this is de facto policy). Warner Bros. has added their company logo as the lead-in to the DVD of Citizen Kane, for instance. The picture itself opens with the proper RKO label. "RKO" doesn't appear on the cover or spine; "WB" is on the spine, and the RKO label (or rather a spiffy new version of their logo) appears on the back amidst a slew of logos, also including WB.
I don't know if any 20th Century Fox assets were used in making Oklahoma!. An original theatrical poster for South Pacific, however, credits it as "a MGM/UA production" which was "produced at 20th Century Fox." This might naturally cause a bit of head scratching; I assume they're using the word "produced" to mean financed and overseen in the first instance, and "physically shot" in the second.
I'd have no objection to Fox calling Oklahoma! and South Pacific "Fox Studio Classics" if that gets them remastered and presented in definitive DVD editions (particularly Oklahoma!). Fox has stated in the past that poor sales of their current editions have kept such remasters unlikely; if putting them into the successful "Fox Studio Classics" line gets it done, I'm all for it, and you won't hear a peep of protest from my quarter.
Greg: those are great ideas for supplements on The King and I and South Pacific. Enthusiastically seconded.
If they own it, it's theirs, and it's far from uncommon for a studio which now holds the rights to the films of another studio to market the picture under their own banner (in fact this is de facto policy). Warner Bros. has added their company logo as the lead-in to the DVD of Citizen Kane, for instance.Actually the Warner Bros logo appears before the menu screen as is the case with all their DVDs. There's no implication that Warner Bros are saying KANE is a Warner production; the film itself starts, as it should, with the RKO logo.
policy). Warner Bros. has added their company logo as the lead-in to the DVD of Citizen Kane, for instance. The picture itself opens with the proper RKO label.When you first place your DVD in the player, the first logo to greet you, before you ever see a menu screen, is WB's.With their logo also on the spine and right alongside RKO's on the back, this seems part and parcel with the notion of calling a classic film Fox acquired, rather than made, a "Fox Studio Classic." Such a declaration is only by inference, as this label is simply the name of a series of discs of which it would be a part, a banner at the top of the front cover. The opening credits for the studio and production entities that actually made the film would undoubtedly remain in front of the film itself (though this has not, by a long shot, always been the case in the history of film acquisitions and re-releases).
If anyone damaged The King and I's camera negative by printing directly off of it in 1996, it was a dramatic error of judgment by no means necessary in properly mastering from 55mm. A restoration of those elements could now be duplicated to negative for printing and this duplicate element used for creating the positive element used in a video master. 55mm to high definition tape to downconverted DVD -- the best path for King and I fidelity.I'm extremely hesitant to accuse you of any kind of error, Bill, but did you mean 65mm or is 55mm an actual printing format?